Publications

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

people standing in front of a screen with images and a chipboard

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

Sort By
  • Title
  • Title, descending
  • Year
  • Year, descending
1 - 15 of 11424 publications
Preview abstract Recent reports have highlighted how mobile apps share user location data with third parties, risking user privacy and platform trust. Although location data is highly sensitive, when users grant apps location access, they may not know the full extent to which it is used. We study how requiring Android apps to show a reason for location access could impact developers, users, and the platform. We surveyed 323 Android app developers and found most supported such a requirement. The majority said it would have a positive impact on user privacy, trust for apps, and trust for Android, where impact on user trust for Android correlated most strongly with support. Many developers also said the intervention would increase the number of users granting location access. Yet their open-ended comments also revealed consistent concerns, such as apps providing dishonest reasons and platform verification. To study the impact on user behavior, we conducted a randomized controlled experiment with 2579 US Android users. We tested how users' decisions to grant location access were impacted by app type, whether reasons were included in the requests, and the content of the reasons, including monetization. We did not find the reasons impacted users' decisions; decisions were instead driven by app type and demographics. Yet we did find the reasons could have a positive impact on user perception for the platform when the reasons did not include using data for ads. Our findings provide insights into developers' willingness to implement privacy-enhancing changes, and expose limits to improving user privacy by simply adding information to user interfaces. View details
Reinforcement Learning with Discrete Diffusion Policies for Combinatorial Action-Spaces
Haitong Ma
Ofir Nabati
Bo Dai
Na Li
Shie Mannor
Guy Tennenholtz
Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-26), Seoul, South Korea (2026)
Preview abstract Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms have achieved superhuman performance on many sequential decision-making tasks, but often struggle in domains with large, combinatorial action spaces. To address this, we introduce a practical and stable algorithm for training discrete diffusion models to represent policies in such environments. We formulate a policy mirror descent algorithm that enhances training stability by reframing policy optimization as an inference problem, which naturally aligns with the learning objective of discrete diffusion models. Through extensive experiments on a suite of challenging benchmark tasks, we demonstrate that our approach achieves significant improvements over existing methods in both performance and sample efficiency. This work opens a promising new direction for applying discrete diffusion models in RL to tackle long-standing challenges in large-scale combinatorial action spaces. View details
Preview abstract This paper demonstrates that artificial intelligence can accelerate mathematical discovery by autonomously solving an open problem in theoretical physics. We present a neuro-symbolic system, combining the Gemini Deep Think large language model with a systematic Tree Search (TS) framework and automated numerical feedback, that successfully derived novel, exact analytical solutions for the power spectrum of gravitational radiation emitted by cosmic strings. Specifically, the agent evaluated the core integral for arbitrary loop geometries, directly improving upon recent AI-assisted attempts that only yielded partial asymptotic solutions. To substantiate our methodological claims regarding AI-accelerated discovery and to ensure transparency, we detail system prompts, search constraints, and intermittent feedback loops that guided the model. The agent identified a suite of 6 different analytical methods, the most elegant of which expands the kernel in Gegenbauer polynomials to naturally absorb the integrand's singularities. The methods lead to an asymptotic result for at large that both agrees with numerical results and also connects to the continuous Feynman parameterization of Quantum Field Theory. We detail both the algorithmic methodology that enabled this discovery and the resulting mathematical derivations. View details
Preview abstract In "Elephants, Goldfish and the New Golden Age of Software Engineering," the author discusses how AI is changing knowledge work, especially software development. Written from the perspective of April 2026, the article points out that while AI speeds up coding, it can also quickly generate a lot of mistakes and messy code if it isn't carefully managed by human oversight and clear processes. The paper outlines a practical approach to working with AI, broken down into three main sections: Using AI as a Tool, Not a Toy: The author notes that people often get poor results by asking AI to do everything in a single prompt. Instead, users should have back-and-forth conversations with AI to question assumptions, set clear grading rules, and guide the research. The main point is that humans must still provide the final judgment; AI is simply a way to speed up and record that thinking. The Elephant-Goldfish Model: As AI creates more code than humans can easily read, written design documents become more important than the code itself. To keep AI on track, the author suggests a two-part method: * The Elephant: A long chat session where the human and AI discuss ideas and write a detailed design document *before* any code is written. This session holds all of the project's background information and decisions. * The Goldfish: A brand-new AI chat session with no memory. The human asks this "goldfish" to read the design document. If the goldfish cannot understand the plan based only on that document, the document needs more details. * Only after the design document is clear enough for the goldfish to understand does the human ask the AI to write the code based on those strict instructions. * Managing AI and the Future of Work: The author expects that regular employees will soon act like managers, overseeing multiple AI helpers. Because of this, workers need to learn basic management skills, like how to delegate tasks and set clear boundaries. Also, since AI will handle routine chores, humans will need to practice focusing for longer periods to do deeper, harder thinking. Ultimately, a worker's value will come from their planning and decision-making skills, rather than their ability to type code. View details
Unveiling the Global Landscape of Android Security Updates
Haiyun Deng
Abbas Acar
Esteban Luques
Harun Oz
Ahmet Aris
Selcuk Uluagac
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (2026)
Preview abstract Android is the world’s leading mobile operating system, with over three billion active devices. Detecting vulnerabilities and ensuring timely patch deployment are critical to maintaining security. The Android Open Source Project (AOSP) has enhanced the transparency of security updates through Security Patch Levels. However, challenges related to update speed and availability persist. In 2022, Google reported that half of the zero-day vulnerabilities discovered in the wild were variations of vulnerabilities that had already been patched. Recent research mainly highlights delays in update distribution, often attributing them to fragmentation and focusing primarily on flagship devices or limited time-frames. Our approach takes a device-centric perspective to investigate Android update patterns, analyzing 567K security update records from 2014 to 2024, covering 904 distinct devices from six key Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) across 98 countries. Our extensive analysis revealed notable differences in update release timing across OEMs, device types, and regions. Our study also examines documented vulnerabilities and weaknesses, while assessing OEM compliance with Android security guidelines. Our study shows that ∼89.7% of vulnerabilities on unpatched Android devices are exploitable without user interaction and with low attack complexity. We also identified delays linked to fragmentation and OEM-specific challenges, and provide actionable insights for improvement. View details
See2Refine: Vision-Language Feedback Improves LLM-Based eHMI Action Designers
Ding Xia
Xinyue Gui
Mark Colley
Fan Gao
Dongyuan Li
Renhe Jiang
Takeo Igarashi
ACL 26 (2026)
Preview abstract Automated vehicles lack natural communication channels with other road users, making external Human-Machine Interfaces (eHMIs) essential for conveying intent and maintaining trust in shared environments. However, most eHMI studies rely on developer-crafted message-action pairs, which are difficult to adapt to diverse and dynamic traffic contexts. A promising alternative is to use Large Language Models (LLMs) as action designers that generate context-conditioned eHMI actions, yet such designers lack perceptual verification and typically depend on fixed prompts or costly human-annotated feedback for improvement. We present See2Refine, a human-free, closed-loop framework that uses vision-language models (VLMs) for perceptual evaluation as automated visual feedback to improve an LLM-based eHMI action designer. Given a driving context and a candidate eHMI action, the VLM evaluates the perceived appropriateness of the action, and this feedback is used to iteratively revise the designer's outputs, enabling systematic refinement without human supervision. We evaluate our framework across three eHMI modalities (lightbar, eyes, and arm) and multiple LLM model sizes. Across settings, our framework consistently outperforms prompt-only LLM designers and manually specified baselines in both VLM-based metrics and human-subject evaluations. Results further indicate that the improvements generalize across modalities and that VLM evaluations are well aligned with human preferences, supporting the robustness and effectiveness of \systemName for scalable action design. View details
Preview abstract Automating AI research differs from general software engineering due to computationally expensive evaluation (e.g., model training) and opaque performance attribution. Current LLM-based agents struggle here, often generating monolithic scripts that ignore execution costs and causal factors. We introduce MARS (Modular Agent with Reflective Search), a framework optimized for autonomous AI research. MARS relies on three pillars: (1) Budget-Aware Planning via cost-constrained Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to explicitly balance performance with execution expense; (2) Modular Construction, employing a "Design-Decompose-Implement" pipeline to manage complex research repositories; and (3) Comparative Reflective Memory, which addresses credit assignment by analyzing solution differences to distill high-signal insights. MARS achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source frameworks on MLE-Bench under comparable settings, maintaining competitiveness with the global leaderboard's top methods. Furthermore, the system exhibits qualitative "Aha!" moments, where 63% of all utilized lessons originate from cross-branch transfer, demonstrating that the agent effectively generalizes insights across search paths. View details
Preview abstract We study the stochastic linear bandits with parameter noise model, in which the reward of action $a$ is $a^\top \theta$ where $\theta$ is sampled i.i.d. We show a regret upper bound of $\tO \brk{\sqrt{d T \logKdelta \sigmax}}$ for a horizon $T$, general action set of size $K$ of dimension $d$, and where $\sigmax$ is the maximal variance of the reward for any action. We further provide a lower bound of $\tOmega \brk{d \sqrt{T \sigmax}}$ which is tight (up to logarithmic factors) whenever $\log \brk{K} \approx d$. For more specific action sets, $\ell_p$ unit balls with $p \leq 2$ and dual norm $q$, we show that the minimax regret is $\tTheta \brk{\sqrt{dT \vsigq}}$, where $\vsigq$ is a variance-dependent quantity that is always at most $4$. This is in contrast to the minimax regret attainable for such sets in the classic additive noise model, where the regret is of order $d \sqrt{T}$. Surprisingly, we show that this optimal (up to logarithmic factors) regret bound is attainable using a very simple explore-exploit algorithm. View details
Preview abstract AI agents equipped with tool-calling capabilities are susceptible to \emph{Indirect Prompt Injection} (IPI) attacks. In this attack scenario, malicious commands hidden within \emph{untrusted} content trick the agent into performing unauthorized actions. Existing defenses can reduce attack success but often suffer from the \emph{over-defense dilemma}: they deploy expensive, \emph{always-on} sanitization that degrades utility and latency even in benign scenarios. We revisit IPI through an operational causal lens: a successful injection manifests as a \emph{grounding collapse} where the user request no longer provides decisive support for the agent's privileged action, while a particular untrusted segment provides disproportionate marginal support. Based on this signature, we propose \texttt{CausalArmor}, a selective defense framework that (i) computes lightweight, normalized leave-one-out attributions at privileged decision points, and (ii) triggers targeted sanitization only when an untrusted segment dominates the user intent. Additionally, CausalArmor employs \emph{retroactive Chain-of-Thought masking} to prevent the agent from acting on ``poisoned" reasoning traces. Experiments on AgentDojo and DoomArena demonstrate that CausalArmor matches the security of aggressive defenses with explainability while preserving utility and latency of AI agents. View details
Preview abstract There are growing concerns about AI-generated image-based sexual abuse (AI-IBSA), also known as nonconsensual sexualized ′deepfakes.′ Empirical research on AI-IBSA, however, remains very limited. This study surveyed 7231 respondents across Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States to investigate community attitudes and perceptions on AI-IBSA. Through a vignette study, we explored the relationship between public familiarity with AI-IBSA, normative concerns about consent, and context-dependent judgments that vary based on the target's identity relational status, and how the content was used. Our findings reveal strong condemnation of AI-IBSA, yet respondents demonstrated low familiarity with the technology and their views varied depending on particular contexts. AI-IBSA targeting intimate partners was viewed as more unacceptable than targeting celebrities, and content created solely for personal use was seen as less unacceptable than content intended for distribution. The study highlights the need for approaches that go beyond technical fixes and punitive measures, advocating for a multifaceted response that integrates ethical data governance, digital sexual literacy, and restorative justice approaches. View details
Preview abstract Advanced reasoning typically requires Chain-of-Thought prompting, which is accurate but incurs prohibitive latency and substantial test-time inference costs. The standard alternative, fine-tuning smaller models, often sacrifices interpretability while introducing significant resource and operational overhead. To address these limitations, we introduce Prompt-Level Distillation (PLD). We extract explicit reasoning patterns from a Teacher model and organize them into a structured list of expressive instructions for the Student model's System Prompt. Evaluated on the StereoSet and Contract-NLI datasets using Gemma-3 4B, PLD improved Macro F1 scores from 57\% to 90.0\% and 67\% to 83\% respectively, enabling this compact model to match frontier performance with negligible latency overhead. These expressive instructions render the decision-making process transparent, allowing for full human verification of logic, making this approach ideal for regulated industries such as law, finance, and content moderation, as well as high-volume use cases and edge devices. View details
Preview abstract We study the d-dimensional knapsack problem. We are given a set of items, each with a d-dimensional cost vector and a profit, along with a d-dimensional budget vector. The goal is to select a set of items that do not exceed the budget in all dimensions and maximize the total profit. A polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) with running time n^{Θ(d/{ε})} has long been known for this problem, where {ε} is the error parameter and n is the encoding size. Despite decades of active research, the best running time of a PTAS has remained O(n^{⌈ d/{ε} ⌉ - d}). Unfortunately, existing lower bounds only cover the special case with two dimensions d = 2, and do not answer whether there is a n^{o(d/({ε)})}-time PTAS for larger values of d. In this work, we show that the running times of the best-known PTAS cannot be improved up to a polylogarithmic factor assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Our techniques are based on a robust reduction from 2-CSP, which embeds 2-CSP constraints into a desired number of dimensions. Then, using a recent result of [Bafna Karthik and Minzer, STOC'25], we succeed in exhibiting tight trade-off between d and {ε} for all regimes of the parameters assuming d is sufficiently large. Informally, our result also shows that under ETH, for any function f there is no f(d/({ε)}) ⋅ n^{õ(d/({ε)})}-time (1-{ε})-approximation for d-dimensional knapsack, where n is the number of items and õ hides polylogarithmic factors in d/({ε)}. View details
Twenty years of Bigtable
Fabio Baltieri
Bora Beran
Igor Bernstein
Aimee Borda
Adrian Chan
Mark D'Andrea
Artak Dashyan
Ramesh Dharan
Gabor Dinnyes
Mike Dominguez
dorland .
Jose Duenas
Gary Elliott
Bruno Furtado
Madison Garcia
Marçal Garolera Huguet
Brendan Gleason
Alexis Hawkins
Anoshak Irani
Rohit Jog
Sudarshan Kadambi
Vikram Khemka
Sailesh Krishnamurthy
Maxim Krivokon
Bruce Lee
Tom Magrino
Matt Maly
Mark Mangrich
Douglas McErlean
Pablo Montes
Li Moore
Eduardo Morales
Greg Morris
Steve Niemitz
Gaurav Prabhu Gaonkar
Jim Rutherford
Stephen Ryan
Sho Saha
Kanoj Sarcar
Cristina Schmidt
Andrii Shyshkalov
Pratibha Suryadevara
Nick Suttle
Anvit Tawar
John Tobin
Justin Uang
Phaneendhar Vemuru
Harendra Verma
Shitanshu Verma
Jinghang (Frank) Wang
Michal Wegorek
Simon Yau
Andrius Ziukas
SIGMOD Companion '26: Companion of the International Conference on Management of Data, ACM (2026), pp. 188-200
Preview abstract Bigtable is a pioneering and influential non-relational database system. The original Bigtable paper has been widely cited and it inspired and influenced many other systems such as HBase and Cassandra. Since then, Bigtable has continued to grow and has become one of the largest database systems inside Google. In this paper, we tell the journey of Bigtable inside Google for the last twenty years. We present new features added and improvements made to Bigtable, and we share our experience of running this storage system at scale, continually improving all aspects to accommodate the ever-growing demands of users. View details
Performance analysis of updated Sleep Tracking algorithms across Google and Fitbit wearable devices
Arno Charton
Linda Lei
Siddhant Swaroop
Marius Guerard
Michael Dixon
Logan Niehaus
Shao-Po Ma
Ross Wilkinson
Ryan Gillard
Conor Heneghan
Pramod Rudrapatna
Mark Malhotra
Shwetak Patel
Google, Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 (2026) (to appear)
Preview abstract Background: The general public has increasingly adopted consumer wearables for sleep tracking over the past 15 years, but reports on performance versus gold standards such as polysomnogram (PSG), high quality sleep diaries and at-home portable EEG systems still show potential for improved performance. Two aspects in particular are worthy of consideration: (a) improved recognition of sleep sessions (times when a person is in bed and has attempted to sleep), and (b) improved accuracy on recognizing sleep stages relative to an accepted standard such as PSG. Aims: This study aimed to: 1) provide an update on the methodology and performance of a system for correctly recognizing valid sleep sessions, and 2) detail an updated description of how sleep stages are calculated using accelerometer and inter-beat intervals Methods: Novel machine learning algorithms were developed to recognize sleep sessions and sleep stages using accelerometer sensors and inter-beat intervals derived from the watch or tracker photoplethysmogram. Algorithms were developed on over 3000 nights of human-scored free-living sleep sessions from a representative population of 122 subjects, and then tested on an independent validation set of 47 users. Within sleep sessions, an algorithm was developed to recognize periods when the user was attempting to sleep (Time-Attempting-To-Sleep = TATS). For sleep stage estimation, an algorithm was trained on human expert-scored polysomnograms, and then tested on 50 withheld subject nights for its ability to recognize Wake, Light (N1/N2), Deep (N3) and REM sleep relative to expert scored labels. Results: For sleep session estimation, the algorithm had at least 95% overlap on TATS with human consensus scoring for 94% of nights from healthy sleepers. For sleep stage estimation, comparing with the current Fitbit algorithm, Cohen’s kappa for four-class determination of sleep stage increased from an average of 0.56 (std 0.13) to 0.63 (std 0.12), and average accuracy increased from 71% (std 0.10) to 77% (std 0.078) Conclusion: A set of new algorithms has been developed and tested on Fitbit and Pixel Watches and is capable of providing robust and accurate measurement of sleep in free-living environments. View details
×