Preview abstract
Multilingual large language models (LLMs) have minimized the fluency gap between languages. This advancement, however, exposes models to the risk of biased behavior, as knowledge and norms may propagate across languages. In this work, we aim to quantify models' inter- and intra-lingual biases, via their ability to answer locale-ambiguous questions. To this end, we present LocQA, a test set containing 2,156 questions in 12 languages, referring to various locale-dependent facts such as laws, dates, and measurements. The questions do not contain indications of the locales they relate to, other than the querying language itself. LLMs' responses to LocQA locale-ambiguous questions thus reveal models' implicit priors. We used LocQA to evaluate 32 models, and detected two types of structural biases. Inter-lingually, we show a global bias towards answers relevant to the US-locale, even when models are asked in languages other than English. Moreover, we discovered that this global bias is exacerbated in models that underwent instruction tuning, compared to their base counterparts. Intra-lingually, we show that when multiple locales are relevant for the same language, models act as demographic probability engines, prioritizing locales with larger populations. Taken together, insights from LocQA may help in shaping LLMs' desired local behavior, and in quantifying the impact of various training phases on different kinds of biases.View details
Preview abstract
Recent advances in speech technology predominantly favor high-resource languages, leaving speakers of Sub-Saharan African languages underserved. To bridge this divide, we introduce WAXAL, an open, large-scale speech dataset spanning 24 African languages representing over 100 million speakers. WAXAL comprises over 14,100 hours of speech collected in partnership with African academic and community organizations to build local research capacity: an Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) corpus with 2,340 hours of transcribed, image-prompted natural speech across 19 languages (plus ~11,760 untranscribed hours) and a studio-quality Text-to-Speech (TTS) corpus exceeding 235 hours. We empirically benchmark three architecturally distinct ASR models---Gemma 3n 2B, Whisper-Large-v3, and MMS-1B-all---across the 19 ASR languages on strictly speaker-disjoint splits. Fine-tuning on WAXAL yields substantial gains, reducing macro-average WER by up to 58% for Whisper-Large-v3, 56% for Gemma 3n 2B, and 17% for MMS-1B-all (and Character Error Rate by up to 70%). WAXAL-fine-tuned models generalize zero-shot to three out-of-distribution benchmarks---FLEURS, Mozilla Common Voice, and Sunbird SALT---and outperform FLEURS-trained baselines in bidirectional cross-dataset transfer. Finally, an LLM-as-judge semantic evaluation confirms that fine-tuning preserves speaker intent beyond surface-level transcription metrics. WAXAL is publicly released under a CC-BY-4.0 license at https://huggingface.co/datasets/google/WaxalNLPView details
Preview abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems show promise for assisting primary care providers (PCPs) with patient care. We aimed to evaluate the safety and quality of clinical conversations of a patient-facing conversational AI system, which engaged in real-world urgent primary care appointments.
Methods: In this prospective, single-centre, single-arm feasibility study, English-speaking patients aged at least 18 years interacted with the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE) up to 5 days before a single-complaint urgent primary care appointment. Physician safety supervisors monitored all interactions and were trained to intervene on the basis of predefined safety criteria. AMIE transcripts and summaries were shared with PCPs before the visit. Primary outcomes were the number of supervised conversation safety stops, AMIE’s conversation quality assessed by clinical evaluators, and patient and PCP experiences per surveys. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06911398).
Findings: From April to November, 2025, 114 patients were enrolled with 98 completing both the AMIE interaction and the PCP appointment. Zero conversation safety stops were required on the basis of prespecified criteria. Safety supervisors noted one hallucination and added clinical information in five interactions. AMIE’s conversations were rated favourably in 87–100% of cases (17 criteria) by clinical evaluators, and 48–96% (16 criteria) by patients. Patient attitudes towards AI improved after interacting with AMIE and remained elevated after the patient’s visit with their physician. PCPs completed post-surveys in 60 of 98 cases, including 44 cases in which they reviewed the AMIE transcript before the visit. PCPs found AMIE helpful for visit preparation in 33 of 44 cases and reported that it might have changed their behaviour in 25 of 44 cases.
Interpretation: Although further research is needed, this study shows the initial feasibility of conversational AI in a real-world setting—assessed via conversation safety and quality, as well as user acceptance—and represents a crucial step towards clinical translation.
Funding: Alphabet.View details
Preview abstract
Audio-visual interaction is the standard for patient-physician consultations, enabling natural communication and effective assessment of illness through non-verbal cues. While text-based AI has shown promise, it discards essential perceptual dimensions and limits patients who cannot articulate symptoms in writing. Early efforts to extend medical AI to audio-visual interaction have demonstrated feasibility, but not reached clinician-level performance. Here, we provide the first demonstration of expert-level AI in real-time clinical video consultations using AMIE (Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer) in a video configuration. AMIE (Video) is a Gemini-based multi-agent system integrating low-latency dialogue, clinical reasoning, and real-time audio-visual perception. To guide development, we established a taxonomy and automated evaluations for clinical audio-visual cues in telehealth settings. In a randomized Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) study with 30 primary care physicians (PCPs), 15 patient actors and 100 clinical scenarios, we compared AMIE (Video), its text-only counterpart AMIE (Text), and PCPs consulting via video. Clinical evaluators rated AMIE (Video) on par or better than PCPs in history-taking, diagnosis, management, and physical observation and examination. Patient actors preferred AMIE's approach to assessing and explaining conditions, while PCPs were preferred for rapport and partnership building. In modality ablation, patient actors preferred AMIE (Video)'s interface over text chat for communicative effectiveness, convenience, and feeling understood. Limitations remain in fine anatomical precision, subtle affective nuances, and high-frequency movements. While further research is needed before real-world translation, these results mark an important milestone toward AI systems capable of augmenting care across the sensory complexity of clinical practice.View details
Preview abstract
Although large language models have shown promise in diagnostic dialogue, their capabilities for effective management reasoning, including disease progression, therapeutic response and safe medication prescription, have remained underexplored. We have advanced the previously demonstrated diagnostic capabilities of the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE) using a new large-language-model-based agentic system optimized for multivisit clinical management and dialogue. To ground the reasoning of AMIE in authoritative clinical knowledge, we leveraged the long-context capabilities of Gemini, combining in-context retrieval with structured reasoning to align its output with up-to-date clinical practice guidelines and drug formularies. In a randomized, blinded virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination study, AMIE was compared to 21 primary care physicians (PCPs) across 100 multivisit case scenarios designed to reflect the guidance of the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and BMJ Best Practice guidelines. AMIE was non-inferior to PCPs in management reasoning, as assessed by specialists, and scored better both with respect to preciseness of treatment and investigation, and in terms of its alignment with and grounding in clinical guidelines. To benchmark medication reasoning, we developed RxQA, a multiple-choice question benchmark that was derived from two national drug formularies (from the USA and UK) and validated by board-certified pharmacists. Although AMIE and PCPs both benefited from the ability to access external drug information, AMIE outperformed PCPs on higher-difficulty questions. Although further research will be needed before real-world translation of AMIE, its strong performance across evaluations marks a significant step towards use of conversational artificial intelligence as a tool in disease management.View details
Preview abstract
Trust in clinical artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be benchmarked into existence. It must be earned through rigorous prospective studies in real-world clinical settings, where the hardest lessons often concern the humans and systems around the AI, not the technology itself.View details
Preview abstract
Geospatial data offers immense potential for understanding our planet. However, the sheer volume and diversity of this data along with its varied resolutions, timescales, and sparsity pose significant challenges for thorough analysis and interpretation. The emergence of Foundation Models (FMs) and Large Language Models (LLMs) offers an unprecedented opportunity to tackle some of this complexity, unlocking novel and profound insights into our planet.
This paper introduces a comprehensive approach to developing Earth AI solutions, built upon foundation models across three key domains—Planet-scale Imagery, Population, and Environment—and an intelligent Gemini-powered reasoning engine. We present rigorous benchmarks showcasing the power and novel capabilities of our foundation models and validate that they provide complementary value to improve geospatial inference. We show that the synergy between these models unlocks superior predictive capabilities. To handle complex, multi-step queries, we developed a Gemini-powered agent that jointly reasons over our multiple foundation models along with large geospatial data sources and tools to unlock novel geospatial insights. On a new benchmark of real-world crisis scenarios, our agent demonstrates the ability to deliver critical and timely insights, effectively bridging the gap between raw geospatial data and actionable understanding.View details
Preview abstract
Fixed time strategy is a common approach in signal traffic control in which signal plans are simple and periodic, enjoying easy implementation without detection mechanisms. A traffic light is associated with several daily plans, each applied to several consecutive hours. Time-of-day breakpoints (TODs) refer to the times over the day in which the plan is changed. TODs are often selected based on traffic, aiming to divide the day into groups of consecutive hours with similar traffic characteristics within each group of hours. We present a methodology to study time-of-day breakpoints in practice. We use this methodology to estimate and analyze time-of-day breakpoints in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil based on traffic properties derived from traffic trajectories. Our study examines over 900 of the city intersections. We refer to properties such as the number of daily plans and the times by which plans start. We also provide traffic-aware insights on the potential improvement in the selection of TODs and identify key intersections where adjusting TODs could reduce average delay times. We identify potential improvements in over 8% of the examined intersections. These findings provide valuable insights for traffic engineers seeking to optimize signal timing. View details
Preview abstract
Urban traffic congestion is a growing challenge, and optimizing signal timing strategies is crucial for improving traffic flow and reducing emissions. The coordination of signalized intersections improves both traffic operations and environmental aspects. Coordination is particularly important along arterials, sequences of signalized intersections that serve as the primary routes and carry a high volume of traffic. In this paper we analyze real data from the city of Rio de Janeiro to study properties of arterials. We refer to their length, the distance between intersections and to the properties of the traffic light plans such as cycle time. We then study their in practice level of coordination in terms of number of stops and their common locations along the arterials. We dive into particular arterials and provide insights that can be useful for efficient design of arterials in additional cities. Based on the analysis, we show how simple traffic properties can indicate the potential upon coordinating two adjacent intersections as part of an arterial in improving traffic performance.View details
Preview abstract
Optimizing signal timing in traffic lights helps to improve traffic flow and reduce emissions through reducing delays. At intersections, vehicles from different movements observe different delays impacted by the traffic light plan. This paper analyzes delay fairness among various vehicles at intersections. We refer to three cities: Rio de Janeiro, Hamburg and Seattle with a total number of over 5100 intersections. We present an intuitive methodology to compute delay fairness based on Gini index, a common fairness measure in economics. We evaluate the fairness based on real traffic data and provide insights on the relationship of fairness with day hours and traffic demand. We also examine real changes in traffic light plans that occurred in practice to check whether improving delay is often aligned with increasing fairness.View details