Publications

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

people standing in front of a screen with images and a chipboard

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

Sort By
  • Title
  • Title, descending
  • Year
  • Year, descending
1 - 15 of 11426 publications
Preview abstract Recent reports have highlighted how mobile apps share user location data with third parties, risking user privacy and platform trust. Although location data is highly sensitive, when users grant apps location access, they may not know the full extent to which it is used. We study how requiring Android apps to show a reason for location access could impact developers, users, and the platform. We surveyed 323 Android app developers and found most supported such a requirement. The majority said it would have a positive impact on user privacy, trust for apps, and trust for Android, where impact on user trust for Android correlated most strongly with support. Many developers also said the intervention would increase the number of users granting location access. Yet their open-ended comments also revealed consistent concerns, such as apps providing dishonest reasons and platform verification. To study the impact on user behavior, we conducted a randomized controlled experiment with 2579 US Android users. We tested how users' decisions to grant location access were impacted by app type, whether reasons were included in the requests, and the content of the reasons, including monetization. We did not find the reasons impacted users' decisions; decisions were instead driven by app type and demographics. Yet we did find the reasons could have a positive impact on user perception for the platform when the reasons did not include using data for ads. Our findings provide insights into developers' willingness to implement privacy-enhancing changes, and expose limits to improving user privacy by simply adding information to user interfaces. View details
Preview abstract Zero-concentrated differential privacy (zCDP) is a variant of differential privacy (DP) that is widely used partly thanks to its nice composition property. While a tight conversion from ε-DP to zCDP exists for the worst-case mechanism, many common algorithms satisfy stronger guarantees. In this work, we derive tight zCDP characterizations for several fundamental mechanisms. We prove that the tight zCDP bound for the ε-DP Laplace mechanism is exactly (ε + e^{−ε} − 1), confirming a recent conjecture by Wang [Wan22]. We further provide tight bounds for the discrete Laplace mechanism, k-Randomized Response (for k ≤ 6), and RAPPOR. Lastly, we also provide a tight zCDP bound for the worst case bounded range mechanism. View details
Nudging Developers Toward Privacy: Evaluating the Impact of Personalized App Review Reports
Omer Akgul
Michelle L. Mazurek
USENIX Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) (2026)
Preview abstract Mobile application developers often struggle to create accurate privacy notices or implement robust privacy practices due to limited expertise or resources. While users share unsolicited privacy feedback in app reviews, and prior research has characterized this privacy feedback, uncovering developer reactions to this feedback remains unexplored. This study explores whether personalized privacy review reports---summarizing real user feedback for a developer's own app---can effectively nudge them toward planning privacy improvements. We surveyed 42 app developers, presenting them with reports containing privacy themes, temporal trends, peer benchmarks, and emotion distributions derived from their apps' reviews. Our findings indicate that these privacy report interventions proved highly effective, with 76% (32 of 42) of participants finding at least one section of the report useful. Furthermore, exposure to the report increased the participants' intent to pursue privacy-relevant actions -- such as reorganizing the UI, enhancing privacy communications, or adding/removing features -- with 69% (29 of 42) of participants indicating an increased intent to do so. Almost all developers expressed a desire to receive such privacy reports periodically or on demand. These results indicate that making this style of report broadly available across the industry could foster a more privacy-conscious mobile ecosystem. View details
Preview abstract Scaling test-time computation improves performance across different tasks on large language models (LLMs), yet mainstream scaling methods remain challenging for tool-augmented LLM agents. Sequential scaling tends to yield shallow tool use and under-exploration, whereas parallel scaling inflates cost through repeated tool calls. The dual costs of tokens and tool calls further complicate cost accounting and hinder fair comparison. In this work, we study the test-time scaling of widely used, tool-reliant search agents under resource constraints, analyzing performance with a unified cost metric that incorporates both tokens and tool calls. To this end, we propose Cost-effective Agent Test-Time Scaling (CATS), a budget-aware framework designed to support more cost-effective scaling by guiding resource allocation between sequential and parallel exploration. Experiments across search-intensive benchmarks show that CATS produces more favorable scaling curves, attaining higher accuracy with fewer tool calls and lower overall cost. Our work introduces a cost-conscious design for agent test-time scaling and contributes empirical insights that enable a more transparent and principled understanding of scaling in tool-augmented agents. View details
CrossCheck: Input Validation for WAN Control Systems
Rishabh Iyer
Isaac Keslassy
Sylvia Ratnasamy
Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI) (2026) (to appear)
Preview abstract We present CrossCheck, a system that validates inputs to the Software-Defined Networking (SDN) controller in a Wide Area Network (WAN). By detecting incorrect inputs—often stemming from bugs in the SDN control infrastructure—CrossCheck alerts operators before they trigger network outages. Our analysis at a large-scale WAN operator identifies invalid inputs as a leading cause of major outages, and we show how CrossCheck would have prevented those incidents. We deployed CrossCheck as a shadow validation system for four weeks in a production WAN, during which it accurately detected the single incident of invalid inputs that occurred while sustaining a 0% false positive rate under normal operation, hence imposing little additional burden on operators. In addition, we show through simulation that CrossCheck reliably detects a wide range of invalid inputs (e.g., detecting demand perturbations as small as 5% with 100% accuracy) and maintains a near-zero false positive rate for realistic levels of noisy, missing, or buggy telemetry data (e.g., sustaining zero false positives with up to 30% of corrupted telemetry data). View details
Preview abstract While non-verbal behaviors and expressive movements are essential for natural human-robot interaction, existing methods often overlook a crucial element: the human’s internal cognitive state. Consequently, proactive multi-agent systems frequently interrupt humans at inopportune moments, leading to cognitive overload and decreased task performance. This paper introduces a framework for generating “cognitively aligned” multi-agent interactions, enhancing the ability of robotic systems to contextually defer communications during moments of high human mental workload. We present the design and implementation of a closed-loop architecture that explores the interplay between autonomous task execution and real-time neurophysiological focus. Utilizing a consumer-grade Brain-Computer Interface (BCI), our approach continuously monitors Electroencephalography (EEG) spectral band powers while a human performs a cognitive-load-inducing task. We propose a workload-driven pipeline where an HTTP-based signaling mechanism places a primary agent’s sensory inputs and audio outputs into a holding state upon detecting high cognitive load. This allows secondary agents to seamlessly process complex, delegated tasks in the background. Once the human’s cognitive state returns to a baseline, the primary agent releases the queued agent message. Our preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility of leveraging real-time signal processing, Large Language Models (LLMs), and physical robotic embodiments to create interrupt-aware, non-intrusive multi-agent systems. View details
Preview abstract The fundamental theorem of statistical learning establishes that binary PAC learning is governed by a single parameter---the Vapnik-Chervonenkis ($\mathtt{VC}$) dimension---which controls both learnability and sample complexity. Extending this characterization to multiclass classification has long been challenging, since the early work of Natarajan in the late 80's that proposed the Natarajan dimension ($\mathtt{Nat}$) as a natural analogue of the VC dimension. Daniely and Shalev-Shwartz (2014) introduced the $\mathtt{DS}$ dimension, later shown by Brukhim et al.\ (2022) to characterize multiclass \emph{learnability}. Brukhim et al.\ (2022) also demonstrated that the Natarajan and $\mathtt{DS}$ dimensions can diverge arbitrarily, so that multiclass learning appears to be governed by $\mathtt{DS}$ rather than $\mathtt{Nat}$. We show that the agnostic multiclass PAC sample complexity is in fact governed by \emph{two distinct dimensions}. Specifically, we prove nearly tight agnostic sample complexity bounds that, up to logarithmic factors, take the form $$ \frac{\mathtt{DS}^{1.5}}{\epsilon} + \frac{\mathtt{Nat}}{\epsilon^2} $$ where $\epsilon$ is the excess risk. This bound is tight up to a $\sqrt{\mathtt{DS}}$ factor in the first lower-order term, nearly matching known $\mathtt{Nat}/\epsilon^2$ and $\mathtt{DS}/\epsilon$ lower bounds. The first term reflects the DS-controlled regime, while the second reveals that the Natarajan dimension still dictates asymptotic behavior for small $\epsilon$. Thus, unlike in binary or online classification---where a single dimension (VC or Littlestone) controls both phenomena---multiclass learning inherently involves \emph{two structural parameters}. Our technical approach departs significantly from traditional agnostic learning methods based on uniform convergence or reductions-to-realizable techniques. A key ingredient is a novel online procedure, based on a self-adaptive multiplicative-weights algorithm which performs a label-space reduction. This approach may be of independent interest and find further applications. View details
Abstain and Validate: A Dual-LLM Policy for Reducing Noise in Agentic Program Repair
José Cambronero
Renyao Wei
Grant Uy
Chin-Jung Liu
Shiying Pan
Satish Chandra
ICSE-SEIP '26: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 48th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice, ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), New York, NY, USA (2026), 118 – 129
Preview abstract Agentic automated program repair (APR) is increasingly being used to tackle complex, repository-level bugs in both academic and industry settings. However, changes made by the agent still need to be reviewed by a human before committing them to the codebase to ensure the change correctly fixes the bug. Showing unlikely patches to developers can lead to substantial noise, wasting valuable developer time and decreasing trust in all automated code changes. We introduce two complementary LLM-based policies to reduce such noise: bug abstention and patch critic policies. Bug abstention allows us to exclude bugs that the agentic APR system is unlikely to fix and the patch critic rejects patches that are unlikely to be a good fix for the given bug. We evaluate both policies on three sets of bugs collected from Google’s codebase and agent trajectories generated by an agentic APR system in use at Google. We introduce filtered success rates, where we compute performance after removing trajectories rejected by our policies. On a set of 174 human-reported bugs, abstention and critic can raise filtered success rates up to 13 percentage points and 15 percentage points, respectively, and up to 29 percentage points in combination. For null pointer exceptions and sanitizer-reported bugs with machine-generated bug reports or known reproduction tests, we show the same critic policy can be used to improve average single-sample success rates. View details
ARM MTE Performance in Practice
Taehyun Noh
Yingchen Wang
Tal Garfinkel
Mahesh Madhav
Mattan Erez
Shravan Narayan
Usenix Security (2026)
Preview abstract As artificial intelligence (AI) transitions from experimental pilot programs to mission-critical enterprise operations, traditional software-based security frameworks are proving insufficient against sophisticated infrastructure-level threats. This article introduces the concept of Silicon-Level Sovereignty, a first-principles approach to digital trust that anchors security in the physical hardware rather than the software stack. We examine the technical architecture of Hardware Root of Trust (RoT), specifically focusing on the roles of Trusted Platform Modules (TPMs) and Secure Enclaves in modern AI accelerators such as GPUs and TPUs. By leveraging cryptographic remote attestation, organizations can move from a model of assumed software integrity to one of verifiable hardware-level proof. The discussion provides a comparative analysis of industry-leading implementations, including NVIDIA’s Hopper architecture [1, 2], Google’s Titan-backed TPU v5p [3, 4], and Microsoft’s Azure Boost Cerberus system [5, 6], alongside the cluster-scale trust challenges presented by ultra-large systems like xAI’s Colossus [7]. The article concludes that Silicon-Level Sovereignty is no longer an optional security feature but a foundational requirement for establishing the integrity, privacy, and multi-tenant isolation necessary for high-stakes AI workloads. View details
Preview abstract Multimodal large language models (LLMs) integrate and process information from multiple modalities such as text, images, audio, and video, enabling complex tasks such as audio translation and visual question answering. While powerful, this complexity introduces novel vulnerabilities to sophisticated adversarial attacks. This survey paper provides a comprehensive overview of this rapidly expanding field, systematically categorizing attacks that range from manipulations of single modalities (e.g., perturbed images or audio) to those exploiting cross-modal interactions. We overview how these attacks exploit weaknesses in model fusion, attention mechanisms, and representation learning and provided analyses on their potential for real-world consequences. View details
Expert evaluation of LLM world models: A high-Tc superconductivity case study
Haoyu Guo
Maria Tikhanovskaya
Paul Raccuglia
Alexey Vlaskin
Chris Co
Scott Ellsworth
Matthew Abraham
Lizzie Dorfman
Peter Armitage
Chunhan Feng
Antoine Georges
Olivier Gingras
Dominik Kiese
Steve Kivelson
Vadim Oganesyan
Brad Ramshaw
Subir Sachdev
Senthil Todadri
John Tranquada
Eun-Ah Kim
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2026)
Preview abstract Large Language Models (LLMs) show great promise as a powerful tool for scientific literature exploration. However, their effectiveness in providing scientifically accurate and comprehensive answers to complex questions within specialized domains remains an active area of research. This work evaluates the performance of six different LLM-based systems for answering scientific literature questions, including commercially available closed models and a custom retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system capable of retrieving images alongside text. We conduct a rigorous expert evaluation of the systems in the domain of high-temperature cuprate superconductors, a research area that involves material science, experimental physics, computation, and theoretical physics. We use an expert-curated database of 1726 scientific papers and a set of 67 expert-formulated questions. The evaluation employs a multi-faceted rubric assessing balanced perspectives, factual comprehensiveness, succinctness, evidentiary support, and image relevance. Our results demonstrate that RAG-based systems, powered by curated data and multimodal retrieval, outperform existing closed models across key metrics, particularly in providing comprehensive and well-supported answers, and in retrieving relevant visual information. This study provides valuable insights into designing and evaluating specialized scientific literature understanding systems, particularly with expert involvement, while also highlighting the importance of rich, domain-specific data in such systems. View details
Towards Expert-level Medical AI for Real-time Video Consultations
Mahvish Nagda
Jihyeon Lee
Matthew Thompson
CJ Park
Tim Strother
Roma Ruparel
Teya Bergamaschi
Suhana Bedi
Meet Shah
Pavel Dubov
Toshiyuki Fukuzawa
Sam Schmidgall
Craig Schiff
Joseph Xu
Aliya Rysbek
Yana Lunts
Jan Freyberg
Rebecca Hemenway
Sunny Virmani
David Racz
Carey Radebaugh
Joelle Barral
Kavi Goel
Kat Chou
James Manyika
Gregory Wayne
Yun Liu
Ethan Goh
Christina Chen
Ryutaro Tanno
arXiv, Google (2026)
Preview abstract Audio-visual interaction is the standard for patient-physician consultations, enabling natural communication and effective assessment of illness through non-verbal cues. While text-based AI has shown promise, it discards essential perceptual dimensions and limits patients who cannot articulate symptoms in writing. Early efforts to extend medical AI to audio-visual interaction have demonstrated feasibility, but not reached clinician-level performance. Here, we provide the first demonstration of expert-level AI in real-time clinical video consultations using AMIE (Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer) in a video configuration. AMIE (Video) is a Gemini-based multi-agent system integrating low-latency dialogue, clinical reasoning, and real-time audio-visual perception. To guide development, we established a taxonomy and automated evaluations for clinical audio-visual cues in telehealth settings. In a randomized Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) study with 30 primary care physicians (PCPs), 15 patient actors and 100 clinical scenarios, we compared AMIE (Video), its text-only counterpart AMIE (Text), and PCPs consulting via video. Clinical evaluators rated AMIE (Video) on par or better than PCPs in history-taking, diagnosis, management, and physical observation and examination. Patient actors preferred AMIE's approach to assessing and explaining conditions, while PCPs were preferred for rapport and partnership building. In modality ablation, patient actors preferred AMIE (Video)'s interface over text chat for communicative effectiveness, convenience, and feeling understood. Limitations remain in fine anatomical precision, subtle affective nuances, and high-frequency movements. While further research is needed before real-world translation, these results mark an important milestone toward AI systems capable of augmenting care across the sensory complexity of clinical practice. View details
Preview abstract This study examines the psychological and ethical implications of generative-AI chatbot use among youth, introducing the CTRL framework (Cognitive Trust, Reliance, and Learning Diminution) to explain how repeated use fosters cognitive offloading and reduced verification behavior. Survey data from 420 participants analyzed through factor analysis and structural equation modeling reveal that higher trust predicts greater reliance and diminished critical evaluation, alongside elevated concerns around privacy and academic integrity. Findings highlight the need for AI literacy and responsible design to mitigate unintended cognitive impacts. View details
LLM-Powered Analysis of IoT User Reviews: Tracking and Ranking Security and Privacy Concerns
Taufiq Islam Protick
Anupam Das
Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM) (2026)
Preview abstract Being able to understand the security and privacy (S&P) concerns of IoT users brings benefits to both developers and users. To learn about users' views, we examine Amazon IoT reviews - one of the biggest IoT markets. This work presents a state-of-the-art methodology to identify and categorize reviews in which users express S&P concerns. We developed an automated pipeline by fine-tuning GPT-3.5-Turbo to build two models: the Classifier-Rationalizer-Categorizer and the Thematic Mapper. By leveraging dynamic few-shot prompting and the model's large context size, our pipeline achieved over 97% precision and recall, significantly outperforming keyword-based and classical ML methods. We applied our pipeline to 91K Amazon reviews about fitness trackers, smart speakers and cameras, over multiple years. We found that on average 5% contained S&P concerns, while security camera exhibited the highest prevalence at 10%. Our method detected significantly more S&P-relevant reviews than prior works: 15x more for fitness trackers, 29% more for smart speakers, and 70% more for cameras. Our longitudinal analysis reveals that concerns like surveillance and data control have persisted for years, suggesting limited industry progress. We demonstrate that across all device types, users consistently demand more precise control over what data is collected and shared. We uncover challenges in multi-user and multi-device interactions, identifying two previously unreported themes concerning inadequate controls for account separation and data access. These findings, ranging from broad persistent trends to specific instances of customer loss, offer actionable insights for developers to improve user satisfaction and trust. View details
×