Publications
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Sort By
1 - 15 of 11421 publications
Preview abstract
We study the computational cost of differential privacy in terms of memory
efficiency. While the trade-off between accuracy and differential privacy is
well-understood, the inherent cost of privacy regarding memory use remains
largely unexplored. This paper establishes for the first time an unconditional
space lower bound for user-level differential privacy by introducing a novel
proof technique based on a multi-player communication game.
Central to our approach, this game formally links the hardness of low-memory
private algorithms to the necessity of ``contribution capping''---tracking and
limiting the users who disproportionately impact the dataset. We demonstrate
that winning this communication game requires transmitting information
proportional to the number of over-active users, which translates directly to
memory lower bounds.
We apply this framework, as an example, to the fundamental problem of
estimating the number of distinct elements in a stream and we prove that any
private algorithm requires almost $\widetilde{\Omega}(T^{1/3})$ space to
achieve certain error rates in a promise variant of the problem. This resolves
an open problem in the literature (by Jain et al. NeurIPS 2023 and Cummings et
al. ICML 2025) and establishes the first exponential separation between the
space complexity of private algorithms and their non-private $\widetilde{O}(1)$
counterparts for a natural statistical estimation task. Furthermore, we show
that this communication-theoretic technique generalizes to broad classes of
problems, yielding lower bounds for private medians, quantiles, and max-select.
View details
The Ontic-Epistemic Distinction: Implications for General Intelligence
Master's Thesis (2026) (to appear)
Preview abstract
The current pursuit of robust machine intelligence is largely predicated on a substrate independent, computational functionalist view of cognition, where sufficiently complex computational processing is expected to eventually yield generalized reasoning. This paper explores the ontological distinctions between these computational frameworks and biological cognition, specifically how these differences impact the capacity for semantic understanding. By analyzing phenomena such as the "reversal curse" where models fail to generalize the symmetry in identity relations (A=B implies B=A), and performance on novel reasoning benchmarks (e.g., ARC-AGI), this paper examines whether current model limitations are transient artifacts of scale or indicative of a distinct architectural category. Integrating Stevan Harnad’s “symbol grounding problem” with Evan Thompson’s biological model of “intrinsic normativity,” I investigate whether robust general intelligence might require sense-making: a process distinct from information processing, whereby an agent’s internal states are causally coupled with its environment via survival or system-wide stakes which grounds symbols in meaning. Current Large Language Models (LLMs) appear to lack this intrinsic normativity, and consequently may operate primarily as epistemic instruments rather than ontic agents. By introducing the concept of “ontic grounding”, this paper presents a potential framework for distinguishing between the simulation of reasoning and true understanding, which could have implications for AI safety and governance.
View details
Preview abstract
Source-to-source compilers may perform inefficiently by executing transpilation passes on scripts that do not contain the specific language features a pass is designed to transform, potentially leading to redundant processing. A compiler can analyze a script to generate a per-script feature map, for example, by identifying language features in its abstract syntax tree (AST). Before executing a transpilation pass, the compiler can check this map and may bypass the pass for that script if the specific feature targeted by the pass is not present. This feature map can also be dynamically updated throughout the compilation process as other passes transform the code. This method of conditional pass execution based on content-aware analysis may reduce redundant AST traversals, which could decrease overall compilation time and computational resource consumption.
View details
Preview abstract
Multimodal large language models (LLMs) integrate and process information from multiple modalities such as text, images, audio, and video, enabling complex tasks such as audio translation and visual question answering. While powerful, this complexity introduces novel vulnerabilities to sophisticated adversarial attacks. This survey paper provides a comprehensive overview of this rapidly expanding field, systematically categorizing attacks that range from manipulations of single modalities (e.g., perturbed images or audio) to those exploiting cross-modal interactions. We overview how these attacks exploit weaknesses in model fusion, attention mechanisms, and representation learning and provided analyses on their potential for real-world consequences.
View details
Mull-Tokens: Modality-Agnostic Latent Thinking
Arijit Ray
Chengzhi Mao
Bryan A. Plummer
Kate Saenko
Ranjay Krishna
Leonidas Guibas
Vincent Chu
IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Findings) (2026) (to appear)
Preview abstract
Reasoning goes beyond language; the real world requires reasoning about space, time, affordances, and much more that words alone cannot convey. Existing multimodal models exploring the potential of reasoning with images are brittle and do not scale. They rely on calling specialist tools, costly generation of images, or handcrafted reasoning data to switch between text and image thoughts. Instead, we offer a simpler alternative -- Mull-Tokens -- modality-agnostic latent tokens pre-trained to hold intermediate information in either image or text modalities to let the model think free-form towards the correct answer. We investigate best practices to train Mull-Tokens inspired by latent reasoning frameworks. We first train Mull-Tokens using supervision from interleaved text-image traces, and then fine-tune without any supervision by only using the final answers. Across four challenging spatial reasoning benchmarks involving tasks such as solving puzzles and taking different perspectives, we demonstrate that Mull-Tokens improve upon several baselines utilizing text-only reasoning or interleaved image-text reasoning, achieving a +3% average improvement and up to +16% on a puzzle solving reasoning-heavy split compared to our strongest baseline. Adding to conversations around challenges in grounding textual and visual reasoning, Mull-Tokens offers a simple solution to abstractly think in multiple modalities.
View details
Online Advertising with Spatial Interactions
Yifan Wang
Mingfei Zhao
Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2026, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 213–224
Preview abstract
Online advertising platforms must decide how to allocate multiple ads across limited screen real estate, where each ad's effectiveness depends not only on its own placement but also on nearby ads competing for user attention. Such spatial externalities — arising from proximity, clutter, or crowding — can significantly alter welfare and revenue outcomes, yet existing auction and allocation models typically treat ad slots as independent or ordered along a single dimension. We introduce a new framework for spatial externalities in online advertising, in which the value of an ad depends on both its slot and the configuration of surrounding ads. We model ad slots as points in a metric space, and model an advertiser's value as a function of both their bid and a discount factor determined by the configuration of other displayed ads.
Within this framework, we analyze two natural models. For the Nearest-Neighbor model, where the value suppression depends only on the closest neighboring ad, we present a polynomial-time algorithm that achieves a constant approximation for the general case. We show that the allocation rule is monotone and can be implemented as a truthful mechanism. For a structured setting of 2D Euclidean space, we provide a PTAS. In contrast, for the Product-Distance model, where interference is aggregated multiplicatively across all neighbors, we establish a strong (and nearly-tight) hardness of approximation -- no polynomial-time algorithm can achieve any polynomial-factor approximation unless P=NP, via a reduction from Max-Independent-Set. Our results provide a foundation for reasoning about spatial externalities in ad allocation and for designing efficient, truthful mechanisms under such interactions.
View details
Preview abstract
Ideation, i. e., generating, capturing, organizing, and evaluating ideas, is foundational to creative practices; yet little is known about how blind and low vision ( BLV) creators engage in ideation. We conducted interviews with 20 BLV creators working in different domains including poetry, music production, tactile graphics, digital drawing, and mixed- media arts. Our findings reveal how participants established accessible creative workflows under social and institutional constraints, drew inspiration from diverse physical and digital sources, captured and organized ideas across text, audio, visual, and physical modalities, and evaluated their work through human and AI feedback. We discuss how ableist norms and accessibility breakdowns cascade across ideation pathways, progressively narrowing BLV individuals’ creative possibilities. Finally, we offer design considerations for building accessible ideation support tools that amplify BLV creators’ distinctive practices.
View details
Preview abstract
Generative AI is reshaping the cultural infrastructures through which knowledge is found, synthesized, and held accountable. To make sense of this shift, scholars and policymakers reach for historical analogies of technologies such as the printing press, steam power or electricity. But these comparisons are typically imprecise about which property of the technology carries the comparison, and imprecise analogies produce imprecise governance by designing interventions against the wrong property of the system. This paper offers a diagnostic framework for analyzing how generative AI can transform epistemic and cultural practice. This paper offers a diagnostic framework for analyzing how generative AI can transform epistemic and cultural practice. We decompose each intervention into three coordinates: the epistemic site at which a technology acts, the governing logic by which it organizes its object, and the technical mechanism through which the logic is instantiated. This framework allows us to distinguish between structural cultural consequences, which follow from the mechanism itself, from contingent ones, which remain open to design and institutional choice. Applying the framework to information discovery and knowledge synthesis, we show how the shift from indexicality to inference and from editorial authority to statistical consensus produces specific, traceable cultural effects and reveals governance levers that gestalt analogy obscures.
View details
Preview abstract
Steinke [Ste25] recently asked the following intriguing open question: Can we solve the differentially private selection problem with nearly-optimal error by only (adaptively) invoking Gaussian mechanism on low-sensitivity queries? In this short note, we resolve this question positively. In particular, for a candidate set Y, we achieve error guarantee of O ̃ (log |Y|), which is within a factor of (log log |Y|)^O(1) of the exponential mechanism [MT07]. This improves on Steinke’s mechanism which achieves an error of O(log^{3/2} |Y|).
View details
What’s on My Network? Using Large Language Models to Identify Real-World IoT Devices at Scale
Rameen Mahmood
Danny Yuxing Huang
Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies (CoNEXT), Association for Computing Machinery (2026)
Preview abstract
We introduce AASE (Activation-based AI Safety Enforcement), a framework for post-perception safety monitoring in large language models. Unlike pre-perception approaches that analyze input or output text, AASE monitors the model's internal activation patterns—what the model "understands" rather than what text it processes or generates—enabling detection of safety-relevant states before harmful outputs are produced. The framework comprises three techniques: Activation Fingerprinting (AF) for harmful content detection, Agent Action Gating (AAG) for prompt injection defense, and Activation Policy Compliance (APC) for enterprise policy enforcement. We introduce paired contrastive training to isolate safety-relevant signals from confounding factors such as topic and style, addressing signal entanglement in polysemantic activations. Validation across 7 models from 3 architecture families shows strong class separation: Gemma-2-9B achieves AUC 1.00 with 7.2σ separation across all probes; AAG achieves AUC ≥0.88 across all models on the InjecAgent benchmark; APC achieves 0.97-1.00 AUC across three enterprise policies. Model size correlates with probe quality—Gemma-2-9B (7.2σ separation) outperforms Gemma-2-2B (4.3σ). All techniques survive INT4 quantization with minimal separation degradation. AASE is 9× faster than Llama Guard 3 (33ms vs 306ms) with higher TPR (88% vs 50%) at a tunable threshold that trades FPR for detection sensitivity, adding only 0.002ms probe overhead to existing inference.
View details
Preview abstract
This framework manages AI agents by establishing behavioral boundaries and a persistent identity. It uses a multi-layered stack, combining safety rules with brand guidelines, to shape an agent's reasoning. Features include authority decay to limit power if confidence drops and memory segmentation to prevent data tampering. Centralized oversight ensures these digital representatives remain aligned with company policies through continuous monitoring and testing.
View details
Preview abstract
Quantization methods have significantly improved the compute and memory efficiency of Large Language Model (LLM) training. However, existing approaches still rely on accumulating their updates into high precision: concretely, gradient updates must be applied to a high-precision weight buffer, known as \textit{master weights}. This buffer introduces substantial memory overhead, particularly for Sparse Mixture of Experts (SMoE) models, where model parameters and optimizer states dominate memory usage. In this work, we introduce the Error-Compensating Optimizer (ECO), which \textit{for the first time} enables the complete elimination of master weights by directly accumulating updates into quantized parameters, by leveraging existing optimizer states. ECO quantizes the weights after every gradient step and injects the resulting quantization error into the optimizer's momentum buffer, creating an error-feedback loop with zero additional memory overhead for quantization. Beyond its practical efficiency, ECO comes with theoretical guarantees. Specifically, under standard assumptions, naive master weight removal can lead to unbounded drift from the ideal parameter trajectory, whereas ECO provably bounds this drift, ensuring stable convergence. We validate ECO across a range of models, including small transformers (30M--800M), Gemma-3 1B, and an SMoE 2.1B model, using FP8 quantization. In all cases, ECO achieves near-lossless accuracy compared to high-precision baselines. For large SMoE models, ECO reduces memory usage by up to 25\%, establishing a new Pareto frontier for the trade-off between static memory and training loss.
View details
SpatialStack: Layered Geometry-Language Fusion for 3D VLM Spatial Reasoning
Jian Zhang
Bangya Liu
Achuta Kadambi
Zhiwen Fan
IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2026)
Preview abstract
Large vision-language models (VLMs) still struggle with reliable 3D spatial reasoning, a core capability for embodied and physical AI systems. This limitation arises from their inability to capture fine-grained 3D geometry and spatial relationships. While recent efforts have introduced multi-view geometry transformers into VLMs, they typically fuse only the deep-layer features from vision and geometry encoders, discarding rich hierarchical signals and creating a fundamental bottleneck for spatial understanding. To overcome this, we propose SpatialStack, a general hierarchical fusion framework that progressively aligns vision, geometry, and language representations across the model hierarchy. Moving beyond conventional late-stage vision-geometry fusion, SpatialStack stacks and synchronizes multi-level geometric features with the language backbone, enabling the model to capture both local geometric precision and global contextual semantics. Building upon this framework, we develop VLM-SpatialStack, a model that achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple 3D spatial reasoning benchmarks. Extensive experiments and ablations demonstrate that our multi-level fusion strategy consistently enhances 3D understanding and generalizes robustly across diverse spatial reasoning tasks, establishing SpatialStack as an effective and extensible design paradigm for vision-language-geometry integration in next-generation multimodal physical AI systems.
View details
Ten Insights from Other Domains That Inform Responsible AI Frameworks
Allison Woodruff
Angela McKay
Dunstan Allison-Hope
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (2026), 104–115
Preview abstract
The rapid growth of AI systems is being accompanied by new guidelines, principles, standards, regulations, and best practices (hereafter “frameworks”) that seek to ensure the responsible design, development, deployment, and use of AI systems.
Our premise is that the substance, implementation, and evolution of these AI frameworks can be informed by the practical experience of pursuing similar desired outcomes in other relevant domains (e.g., content moderation, human rights, climate change). This will help ensure that mistakes are not repeated and more rapid progress is made.
We used a “repetition test” to generate the following ten insights from other domains. Insights passing the “repetition test” are those that experts with thousands of hours of practical experience often repeat when describing the best practices that have emerged from their domain.
AI frameworks can draw from these ten insights, rather than invent entirely new approaches.
View details
