Publications
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Sort By
1 - 15 of 11370 publications
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Benjamin Hersh
Jiahao Ren
Xingyue Chen
Robert Timothy Bettridge
Faraz Faruqi
Anthony 'Xiang' Chen
Steve Toh
Google XR, Google (2026)
Preview abstract
While large language models have accelerated software development through "vibe coding", prototyping intelligent Extended Reality (XR) experiences remains inaccessible due to the friction of complex game engines and low-level sensor integration. To bridge this gap, we contribute XR Blocks, an open-source, modular WebXR framework that abstracts spatial computing complexities into high-level, human-centered primitives. Building upon this foundation, we present Vibe Coding XR, an end-to-end rapid prototyping workflow that leverages LLMs to translate natural language intent directly into functional XR software. Using a web-based interface, creators can transform high-level prompts (e.g., "create a dandelion that reacts to hand") into interactive WebXR applications in under a minute. We provide a preliminary technical evaluation on a pilot dataset (VCXR60) alongside diverse application scenarios highlighting mixed-reality realism, multi-modal interaction, and generative AI integrations. By democratizing spatial software creation, this work empowers practitioners to bypass low-level hurdles and rapidly move from "idea to reality." Code and live demos are available at https://xrblocks.github.io/gem and https://github.com/google/xrblocks.
View details
Preview abstract
This paper introduces Operationalized Temporal Entity Resolution, a distributed system architecture designed to resolve data consistency challenges in modern Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) environments. processing petabytes of high-velocity telemetry. We address the critical failure mode of ”State Smearing”—a temporal discrepancy between an entity’s state at event time versus analysis time—which frequently corrupts forensic timelines, particularly regarding ephemeral assets like containers and DHCP leases. Our approach coalesces heterogeneous data from diverse log sources into a single, canonical representation, processing over 2 billion entity fragments daily. By leveraging a deterministic Dynamic Graph Resolution via modified distributed connected components and a novel Density-Aware Temporal Checkpointing algorithm, we generate precise validity intervals. This method embeds temporal state directly into the resolution graph, eliminating the need for computationally expensive query-time joins. Ultimately, this architecture enables security analysts to perform ”time-travel” queries to reconstruct historical states accurately. Analysis of a production environment demonstrates that 8–16% of threat detection rules critically depend on this enriched temporal merging.
View details
Towards A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Reliable Patch Evaluation using an LLM-as-a-Judge
Renyao Wei
Michele Tufano
José Cambronero
AI-SQE '26: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on AI for Software Quality Evaluation - Judgment, Metrics, Benchmarks, and Beyond, ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), New York, NY, USA (2026), pp. 19 - 28
Preview abstract
Reliable evaluation is crucial for advancing Automated Program Repair (APR), but prevailing benchmarks that rely on execution-based evaluation methods (pass@k) often fail to capture the patch quality required for real-world adoption. This creates a significant gap between automated metrics and true patch validity (valid@k), a discrepancy observed across several state-of-the-art techniques.
To develop a scalable solution for measuring valid@k, we first study the human evaluation process itself. While manual assessment can determine validity, we find it suffers from poor inter-rater reliability (Fleiss' Kappa k=0.307). Our foundational insight is that this inconsistency is largely resolved when evaluators use a shared, high-quality rubric, which significantly improves agreement.
Building on this finding, we propose an LLM-as-a-Judge framework that operationalizes rubric-guided evaluation at scale. Our method employs a human-in-the-loop workflow where an LLM first generates a candidate rubric for a given bug, which a human expert then reviews and refines into a "golden" evaluation standard. This golden rubric is then used by an LLM judge to assess the validity of candidate patches. In an evaluation on 48 bugs and 115 patches, our LLM judge demonstrates substantial agreement with the consensus of human developers. This work contributes a scalable and reliable methodology for approximating valid@k, providing a much-needed high-fidelity signal for measuring true progress in the field of automated program repair.
View details
Reasoning-Driven Synthetic Data Generation and Evaluation
Tim R. Davidson
Benoit Seguin
Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2026)
Preview abstract
Although many AI applications of interest require specialized multi-modal models, relevant data to train such models is inherently scarce or inaccessible. Filling these gaps with human annotators is prohibitively expensive, error-prone, and time-consuming, leading model builders to increasingly consider synthetic data as a scalable alternative. However, existing synthetic data generation methods often rely on manual prompts, evolutionary algorithms, or extensive seed data from the target distribution — limiting their scalability, explainability, and control. In this paper, we introduce Simula: a novel reasoning-driven framework for data generation and evaluation. It employs a seedless, agentic approach to generate synthetic datasets at scale, allowing users to define desired dataset characteristics through an explainable and controllable process that enables fine-grained resource allocation. We show the efficacy of our approach on a variety of datasets, rigorously testing both intrinsic and downstream properties. Our work (1) offers guidelines for synthetic data mechanism design, (2) provides insights into generating and evaluating synthetic data at scale, and (3) unlocks new opportunities for developing and deploying AI in domains where data scarcity or privacy concerns are paramount.
View details
Preview abstract
We study the fair allocation of indivisible goods with variable groups. In this model, the goal is to partition the agents into groups of given sizes and allocate the goods to the groups in a fair manner. We show that for any number of groups and corresponding sizes, there always exists an envy-free up to one good (EF1) outcome, thereby generalizing an important result from the individual setting. Our result holds for arbitrary monotonic utilities and comes with an efficient algorithm. We also prove that the EF1 existence can be guaranteed even when the goods lie on a path and each group must receive a connected bundle. In addition, we consider a probabilistic model where the utilities are additive and drawn randomly from a distribution. We show that if there are n agents and the number of goods m is divisible by the number of groups k, then an envy-free outcome exists with high probability if m = ω(log n), and this bound is tight. On the other hand, if m is not divisible by k, then an envy-free outcome is unlikely to exist as long as m = o(√n).
View details
Preview abstract
While non-verbal behaviors and expressive movements are essential for natural human-robot interaction, existing methods often overlook a crucial element: the human’s internal cognitive state. Consequently, proactive multi-agent systems frequently interrupt humans at inopportune moments, leading to cognitive overload and decreased task performance. This paper introduces a framework for generating “cognitively aligned” multi-agent interactions, enhancing the ability of robotic systems to contextually defer communications during moments of high human mental workload. We present the design and implementation of a closed-loop architecture that explores the interplay between autonomous task execution and real-time neurophysiological focus. Utilizing a consumer-grade Brain-Computer Interface (BCI), our approach continuously monitors Electroencephalography (EEG) spectral band powers while a human performs a cognitive-load-inducing task. We propose a workload-driven pipeline where an HTTP-based signaling mechanism places a primary agent’s sensory inputs and audio outputs into a holding state upon detecting high cognitive load. This allows secondary agents to seamlessly process complex, delegated tasks in the background. Once the human’s cognitive state returns to a baseline, the primary agent releases the queued agent message. Our preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility of leveraging real-time signal processing, Large Language Models (LLMs), and physical robotic embodiments to create interrupt-aware, non-intrusive multi-agent systems.
View details
Preview abstract
The field of Human-Computer Interaction is approaching a critical inflection point, moving beyond the era of static, deterministic systems into a new age of self-evolving systems. We introduce the concept of Adaptive generative interfaces that move beyond static artifacts to autonomously expand their own feature sets at runtime. Rather than relying on fixed layouts, these systems utilize generative methods to morph and grow in real-time based on a user’s immediate intent. The system operates through three core mechanisms: Directed synthesis (generating new features from direct commands), Inferred synthesis (generating new features for unmet needs via inferred commands), and Real-time adaptation (dynamically restructuring the interface's visual and functional properties at runtime). To empirically validate this paradigm, we executed a within-subject (repeated measures) comparative study (N=72) utilizing 'Penny,' a digital banking prototype. The experimental design employed a counterbalanced Latin Square approach to mitigate order effects, such as learning bias and fatigue, while comparing Deterministic interfaces baseline against an Adaptive generative interfaces. Participant performance was verified through objective screen-capture evidence, with perceived usability quantified using the industry-standard System Usability Scale (SUS). The results demonstrated a profound shift in user experience: the Adaptive generative version achieved a System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 84.38 ('Excellent'), significantly outperforming the Deterministic version’s score of 53.96 ('Poor'). With a statistically significant mean difference of 30.42 points (p < 0.0001) and a large effect size (d=1.04), these findings confirm that reducing 'navigation tax' through adaptive generative interfaces directly correlates with a substantial increase in perceived usability. We conclude that deterministic interfaces are no longer sufficient to manage the complexity of modern workflows. The future of software lies not in a fixed set of pre-shipped features, but in dynamic capability sets that grow, adapt, and restructure themselves in real-time to meet the specific intent of the user. This paradigm shift necessitates a fundamental transformation in product development, requiring designers to transcend traditional, linear workflows and evolve into 'System Builders'—architects of the design principles and rules that facilitate this new age of self-evolving software.
View details
Preview abstract
We introduce AASE (Activation-based AI Safety Enforcement), a framework for post-perception safety monitoring in large language models. Unlike pre-perception approaches that analyze input or output text, AASE monitors the model's internal activation patterns—what the model "understands" rather than what text it processes or generates—enabling detection of safety-relevant states before harmful outputs are produced. The framework comprises three techniques: Activation Fingerprinting (AF) for harmful content detection, Agent Action Gating (AAG) for prompt injection defense, and Activation Policy Compliance (APC) for enterprise policy enforcement. We introduce paired contrastive training to isolate safety-relevant signals from confounding factors such as topic and style, addressing signal entanglement in polysemantic activations. Validation across 7 models from 3 architecture families shows strong class separation: Gemma-2-9B achieves AUC 1.00 with 7.2σ separation across all probes; AAG achieves AUC ≥0.88 across all models on the InjecAgent benchmark; APC achieves 0.97-1.00 AUC across three enterprise policies. Model size correlates with probe quality—Gemma-2-9B (7.2σ separation) outperforms Gemma-2-2B (4.3σ). All techniques survive INT4 quantization with minimal separation degradation. AASE is 9× faster than Llama Guard 3 (33ms vs 306ms) with higher TPR (88% vs 50%) at a tunable threshold that trades FPR for detection sensitivity, adding only 0.002ms probe overhead to existing inference.
View details
Preview abstract
In a prior column, we wrote about how measuring productivity can be viewed as a form of modeling and that all models are wrong, but some are useful. That discussion centered on the idea of ensuring that a productivity model was inclusive of multiple metrics and that those metrics covered the various facets of productivity and covered each facet reasonably well. In that article, we set aside the question of what makes a good individual productivity metric that can be combined with others into a (hopefully) useful model of productivity. In this article, we’ll share some things we consider when building an individual metric, including an example of a novel metric we built in the aftermath of the COVID pandemic.
View details
Performance analysis of updated Sleep Tracking algorithms across Google and Fitbit wearable devices
Arno Charton
Linda Lei
Siddhant Swaroop
Marius Guerard
Michael Dixon
Logan Niehaus
Shao-Po Ma
Logan Schneider
Ross Wilkinson
Ryan Gillard
Conor Heneghan
Pramod Rudrapatna
Mark Malhotra
Shwetak Patel
Google, Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043 (2026) (to appear)
Preview abstract
Background: The general public has increasingly adopted consumer wearables for sleep tracking over the past 15 years, but reports on performance versus gold standards such as polysomnogram (PSG), high quality sleep diaries and at-home portable EEG systems still show potential for improved performance. Two aspects in particular are worthy of consideration: (a) improved recognition of sleep sessions (times when a person is in bed and has attempted to sleep), and (b) improved accuracy on recognizing sleep stages relative to an accepted standard such as PSG.
Aims: This study aimed to: 1) provide an update on the methodology and performance of a system for correctly recognizing valid sleep sessions, and 2) detail an updated description of how sleep stages are calculated using accelerometer and inter-beat intervals
Methods: Novel machine learning algorithms were developed to recognize sleep sessions and sleep stages using accelerometer sensors and inter-beat intervals derived from the watch or tracker photoplethysmogram. Algorithms were developed on over 3000 nights of human-scored free-living sleep sessions from a representative population of 122 subjects, and then tested on an independent validation set of 47 users. Within sleep sessions, an algorithm was developed to recognize periods when the user was attempting to sleep (Time-Attempting-To-Sleep = TATS). For sleep stage estimation, an algorithm was trained on human expert-scored polysomnograms, and then tested on 50 withheld subject nights for its ability to recognize Wake, Light (N1/N2), Deep (N3) and REM sleep relative to expert scored labels.
Results: For sleep session estimation, the algorithm had at least 95% overlap on TATS with human consensus scoring for 94% of nights from healthy sleepers. For sleep stage estimation, comparing with the current Fitbit algorithm, Cohen’s kappa for four-class determination of sleep stage increased from an average of 0.56 (std 0.13) to 0.63 (std 0.12), and average accuracy increased from 71% (std 0.10) to 77% (std 0.078)
Conclusion: A set of new algorithms has been developed and tested on Fitbit and Pixel Watches and is capable of providing robust and accurate measurement of sleep in free-living environments.
View details
The Ontic-Epistemic Distinction: Implications for General Intelligence
Master's Thesis (2026) (to appear)
Preview abstract
The current pursuit of robust machine intelligence is largely predicated on a substrate independent, computational functionalist view of cognition, where sufficiently complex computational processing is expected to eventually yield generalized reasoning. This paper explores the ontological distinctions between these computational frameworks and biological cognition, specifically how these differences impact the capacity for semantic understanding. By analyzing phenomena such as the "reversal curse" where models fail to generalize the symmetry in identity relations (A=B implies B=A), and performance on novel reasoning benchmarks (e.g., ARC-AGI), this paper examines whether current model limitations are transient artifacts of scale or indicative of a distinct architectural category. Integrating Stevan Harnad’s “symbol grounding problem” with Evan Thompson’s biological model of “intrinsic normativity,” I investigate whether robust general intelligence might require sense-making: a process distinct from information processing, whereby an agent’s internal states are causally coupled with its environment via survival or system-wide stakes which grounds symbols in meaning. Current Large Language Models (LLMs) appear to lack this intrinsic normativity, and consequently may operate primarily as epistemic instruments rather than ontic agents. By introducing the concept of “ontic grounding”, this paper presents a potential framework for distinguishing between the simulation of reasoning and true understanding, which could have implications for AI safety and governance.
View details
Observing long-lived longwave contrail forcing
Aarón Sonabend
Joe Ng
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (2026)
Preview abstract
Contrail microphysical simulations and climate simulations have indicated that contrail cirrus cause a substantial fraction of aviation’s climate impact. While the approximations and parameter selections in these simulations have been well-validated over the past two decades, the heat trapping of contrails has not been observed using satellite data beyond a few hours. This is because contrails lose their linear shape after a few hours, making them difficult to distinguish from natural cirrus clouds. Here we provide satellite-driven analysis of long-lived heat trapping by contrails over North and South America. We aggregate a dataset of GOES-16 estimated outgoing longwave radiation and advected trace density of flight paths, and apply causal inference to discern the effect of contrails while controlling for radiative and cloud confounders. As a means of validation, we also generate synthetic datasets with known ground truth, and confirm that applying the causal inference method is able to recover the synthetic ground truth. Since this method yields an estimate which has some differences from both “instantaneous radiative forcing” (iRF) and “effective radiative forcing” (ERF) estimates which have been reported in the literature so far, we introduce the new term “observational radiative forcing, 12 hours” (oRF12). Our analysis estimates the longwave oRF12 from contrails over the Americas averaged 47.9 gigajoules per flight kilometer (95% CI: 31 to 52 GJ/km) during April 2019 to April 2020.
View details
ARM MTE Performance in Practice
Taehyun Noh
Yingchen Wang
Tal Garfinkel
Mahesh Madhav
Mattan Erez
Shravan Narayan
Usenix Security (2026)
SpatialStack: Layered Geometry-Language Fusion for 3D VLM Spatial Reasoning
Jian Zhang
Bangya Liu
Achuta Kadambi
Zhiwen Fan
IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2026)
Preview abstract
Large vision-language models (VLMs) still struggle with reliable 3D spatial reasoning, a core capability for embodied and physical AI systems. This limitation arises from their inability to capture fine-grained 3D geometry and spatial relationships. While recent efforts have introduced multi-view geometry transformers into VLMs, they typically fuse only the deep-layer features from vision and geometry encoders, discarding rich hierarchical signals and creating a fundamental bottleneck for spatial understanding. To overcome this, we propose SpatialStack, a general hierarchical fusion framework that progressively aligns vision, geometry, and language representations across the model hierarchy. Moving beyond conventional late-stage vision-geometry fusion, SpatialStack stacks and synchronizes multi-level geometric features with the language backbone, enabling the model to capture both local geometric precision and global contextual semantics. Building upon this framework, we develop VLM-SpatialStack, a model that achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple 3D spatial reasoning benchmarks. Extensive experiments and ablations demonstrate that our multi-level fusion strategy consistently enhances 3D understanding and generalizes robustly across diverse spatial reasoning tasks, establishing SpatialStack as an effective and extensible design paradigm for vision-language-geometry integration in next-generation multimodal physical AI systems.
View details
Preview abstract
Generative AI’s humanlike qualities are driving its rapid adoption in professional domains. However, this anthropomorphic appeal raises concerns from HCI and responsible AI scholars about potential hazards and harms, such as overtrust in system outputs. To investigate how technology workers navigate these humanlike qualities and anticipate emergent harms, we conducted focus groups with 30 professionals across six job functions (ML engineering, product policy, UX research and design, product management, technology writing, and communications). Our findings reveal an unsettled knowledge environment surrounding humanlike generative AI, where workers’ varying perspectives illuminate a range of potential risks for individuals, knowledge work fields, and society. We argue that workers require comprehensive support, including clearer conceptions of “humanlikeness” to effectively mitigate these risks. To aid in mitigation strategies, we provide a conceptual map articulating the identified hazards and their connection to conflated notions of “humanlikeness.”
View details
