Publications
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Sort By
1 - 15 of 11355 publications
An experimental evaluation of an AI-powered interactive learning platform
Nicole Miller
Yael Haramaty
Lidan Hackmon
Lior Belinsky
Abraham Oritz Tapia
Lucy Tootill
Scott Siebert
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (2026) (to appear)
Preview abstract
Generative AI, which is capable of transforming static content into dynamic learning experiences, holds the potential to revolutionize student engagement in educational contexts. However, questions still remain around whether or not these tools are effective at facilitating student learning. In this research, we test the effectiveness of an AI-powered platform incorporating multiple representations and assessment through Learn Your Way, an experimental research platform that transforms textbook chapters into dynamic visual and audio representations. Through a between-subjects, mixed methods experiment with 60 US-based students, we demonstrate that students who used Learn Your Way had a more positive learning experience and had better learning outcomes compared to students learning the same content through a digital textbook. These findings indicate that AI-driven tools, capable of providing choice among interactive representations of content, constitute an effective and promising method for enhancing student learning.
View details
Preview abstract
This defensive publication describes a framework for multi-artificial intelligence (AI) orchestration that can be used to address potential limitations associated with reliance on single AI models, such as correlated systemic failures or cognitive blind spots. The described system is a cognitive orchestration framework that can function as a middleware layer to manage tasks across a heterogeneous ensemble of AI models. An orchestrator node can decompose a user request into a sequence of sub-tasks, which an arbitrage engine may then dynamically assign to suitable AI models based on certain factors, such as capability, cost, and latency. For certain tasks, such as those designated as high-risk, a byzantine consensus layer can route the task to multiple diverse models in parallel and may trigger a process, for example a 'cognitive debate,' which could be adjudicated by a third-party judge model to help resolve conflicting outputs. This framework can facilitate a more resilient system that may improve the accuracy and reliability of outputs when compared to some single-model architectures.
View details
System for a Secure, Outcome-Based Synthetic Labor Market Using Trusted Execution Environments
Patent (2026)
Preview abstract
Some artificial intelligence provisioning models that function as tools for human users or rely on labor arbitrage can present challenges for organizations, such as managing personnel rather than task outcomes and introducing data security risks. An architecture is described for an outcome-based synthetic labor market in which autonomous computational agents can be compensated based on verified task completion. The framework can leverage trusted execution environments to create secure hardware enclaves for processing sensitive data, which can render the data cryptographically inaccessible to a host system or agent provider. This approach can facilitate a secure, transactional market for autonomous professional execution, which may enable a shift from managing labor resources to procuring verified outcomes from a pool of specialized agents.
View details
Usability Hasn’t Peaked: Exploring How Expressive Design Overcomes the Usability Plateau
Alyssa Sheehan
Bianca Gallardo
Ying Wang
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’26), April 13–17, 2026, Barcelona, Spain (2026)
Preview abstract
Critics have argued that mobile usability has largely been optimized, and that only incremental gains are possible. We set out to explore if the newest generation of design systems, which promote greater flexibility and a return to design basics, could produce substantially more usable designs while maintaining or increasing aesthetic judgments. Through a study with 48 diverse participants completing tasks in 10 different applications, we found that in designs created following Material 3 Expressive guidelines, users fixated on the correct screen element for a task 33% faster, completed tasks 20% faster, and rated experiences more positively compared to versions designed using the previous Material design system. These improvements in performance and aesthetic ratings challenge the premise of a usability plateau and show that mobile usability has not peaked. We illustrate specific opportunities to make mobile experiences more usable by returning to design fundamentals while highlighting risks of added flexibility.
View details
AI-PROPELLER: Warehouse-Scale Inter-Procedural Code Layout Optimization with AlphaEvolve
Chaitanya Mamatha Ananda
Rajiv Gupta
Aiden Grossman
2026
Preview abstract
Post-link optimizers (PLOs) such as Propeller and BOLT have demonstrated that precise, profile-guided code layout can extract significant performance gains from heavily optimized binaries. However, these systems are currently restricted to intra-procedural techniques, leaving the global potential of inter-procedural layout largely untapped. Inter-procedural code layout is historically difficult due to a combinatorially intractable search space and complex call-return semantics that are challenging to model. Consequently, the performance potential of fine-grained inter-procedural layout remains unproven in practice.Ours uses AlphaEvolve, an agentic workflow to evolve the compiler heuristic in Propeller into a fine-grained inter-procedural optimizer. While AlphaEvolve synthesizes novel code layout policies, Vizier fine-tunes the resulting policy hyperparameters.
To ensure high-fidelity, we move away from approximate static cost models and the agentic workflow generates multiple layout variants that are executed on actual hardware to measure real performance counters, providing a precise reward signal for the evolutionary loop. Ours has been evaluated on several benchmarks including large warehouse-scale applications and experiments show performance improvements of 0.23% to 1.6% on these benchmarks optimized with state-of-the-art FDO and PLO.
This is the first time ever that real-world applications have been optimized with fine-grained inter-procedural code layout.
View details
Preview abstract
We introduce ALPS (Activation-based Length Prediction for Scheduling), a method for predicting LLM generation length from prefill activations before any tokens are generated. Unlike existing approaches that require model fine-tuning or complex entropy-weighted pooling, ALPS uses a simple linear probe on the last-token activation at intermediate layers. We discover that generation length is encoded in prefill representations: a ridge regression probe achieves R-squared > 0.85 across three model families. Validation across Llama-3.1-8B, Gemma-2-9B, and Qwen-2.5-7B demonstrates: (1) intermediate layers generally perform well, with some architectural variation; (2) simple last-token extraction outperforms complex pooling strategies; (3) activations improve substantially over surface-feature baselines (24 percentage points over input length plus lexical features). The best models achieve R-squared = 0.943 (Gemma), R-squared = 0.880 (Llama), and R-squared = 0.857 (Qwen) with MAE of 38-80 tokens. All test prompts terminated naturally (100% EOS), eliminating truncation confounds. While our evaluation uses 200 curated prompts—sufficient for demonstrating the phenomenon but requiring broader validation—cross-validation confirms generalization beyond training data. ALPS enables practical applications including budget-constrained inference, request scheduling, and resource allocation. The probe adds negligible overhead (~16KB direction vector, single dot product), making ALPS practical for production deployment.
View details
Who is At-Risk? Surveying the Prevalence of Risk Factors and Tech-Facilitated Attacks in the United States
Sharon Heung
Claire Weizenegger
Mo Houtti
Tara Matthews
Ashley Walker
2026
Preview abstract
A growing body of qualitative research has identified contextual risk factors that elevate people’s chances of experiencing digital-safety attacks. However, the lack of quantitative data on the population level distribution of these risk factors prevents policymakers and tech companies from developing targeted, evidence-based interventions to improve digital safety. To address this gap, we surveyed 5,001 adults in the United States to analyze: (1) the frequency of and relationship between digital-safety attacks (e.g., scams, harassment, account hacking), and (2) how these attacks align with 10 contextual risk factors. Nearly half of our respondents identify as resource constrained, which significantly correlates with higher likelihood of experiencing four common attacks. We also present qualitative insights to expand our understanding of the factors beyond the existing literature (e.g., “prominence” included high-visibility roles in local communities). This study provides the first large-scale quantitative analysis correlating digital-safety attacks with contextual risk factors and demographics.
View details
Preview abstract
Systems for escalating interactions from automated agents to human agents can create inefficiencies, for example, by transferring unstructured transcripts. An intermediary system can employ a generative artificial intelligence synthesis engine to process the context of an automated interaction upon an escalation trigger. The engine may analyze the dialogue transcript, user metadata, and the automated agent's internal state to perform semantic abstraction, diagnose potential failure points, and infer a possible resolution. The system can then generate a structured briefing for the human agent, which could include a concise summary, a failure diagnosis, or a recommended next action presented as an interactive element. This process may facilitate a more efficient handoff and contribute to an improved escalation workflow by providing the human agent with synthesized, contextual information.
View details
Preview abstract
In "Elephants, Goldfish and the New Golden Age of Software Engineering," the author discusses how AI is changing knowledge work, especially software development. Written from the perspective of April 2026, the article points out that while AI speeds up coding, it can also quickly generate a lot of mistakes and messy code if it isn't carefully managed by human oversight and clear processes.
The paper outlines a practical approach to working with AI, broken down into three main sections:
Using AI as a Tool, Not a Toy:
The author notes that people often get poor results by asking AI to do everything in a single prompt. Instead, users should have back-and-forth conversations with AI to question assumptions, set clear grading rules, and guide the research. The main point is that humans must still provide the final judgment; AI is simply a way to speed up and record that thinking.
The Elephant-Goldfish Model:
As AI creates more code than humans can easily read, written design documents become more important than the code itself. To keep AI on track, the author suggests a two-part method:
* The Elephant: A long chat session where the human and AI discuss ideas and write a detailed design document *before* any code is written. This session holds all of the project's background information and decisions.
* The Goldfish: A brand-new AI chat session with no memory. The human asks this "goldfish" to read the design document. If the goldfish cannot understand the plan based only on that document, the document needs more details.
* Only after the design document is clear enough for the goldfish to understand does the human ask the AI to write the code based on those strict instructions.
* Managing AI and the Future of Work:
The author expects that regular employees will soon act like managers, overseeing multiple AI helpers. Because of this, workers need to learn basic management skills, like how to delegate tasks and set clear boundaries. Also, since AI will handle routine chores, humans will need to practice focusing for longer periods to do deeper, harder thinking. Ultimately, a worker's value will come from their planning and decision-making skills, rather than their ability to type code.
View details
Vibe Coding XR: Accelerating AI + XR Prototyping with XR Blocks and Gemini
Benjamin Hersh
Jiahao Ren
Xingyue Chen
Robert Timothy Bettridge
Faraz Faruqi
Anthony 'Xiang' Chen
Steve Toh
Google XR, Google (2026)
Preview abstract
While large language models have accelerated software development through "vibe coding", prototyping intelligent Extended Reality (XR) experiences remains inaccessible due to the friction of complex game engines and low-level sensor integration. To bridge this gap, we contribute XR Blocks, an open-source, modular WebXR framework that abstracts spatial computing complexities into high-level, human-centered primitives. Building upon this foundation, we present Vibe Coding XR, an end-to-end rapid prototyping workflow that leverages LLMs to translate natural language intent directly into functional XR software. Using a web-based interface, creators can transform high-level prompts (e.g., "create a dandelion that reacts to hand") into interactive WebXR applications in under a minute. We provide a preliminary technical evaluation on a pilot dataset (VCXR60) alongside diverse application scenarios highlighting mixed-reality realism, multi-modal interaction, and generative AI integrations. By democratizing spatial software creation, this work empowers practitioners to bypass low-level hurdles and rapidly move from "idea to reality." Code and live demos are available at https://xrblocks.github.io/gem and https://github.com/google/xrblocks.
View details
Causal Armor: Efficient Indirect Prompt Injection Guardrails via Causal Attribution
Minbeom Kim
Phil Wallis
Kyomin Jung
Dj Dvijotham
2026
Preview abstract
AI agents equipped with tool-calling capabilities are susceptible to \emph{Indirect Prompt Injection} (IPI) attacks. In this attack scenario, malicious commands hidden within \emph{untrusted} content trick the agent into performing unauthorized actions. Existing defenses can reduce attack success but often suffer from the \emph{over-defense dilemma}: they deploy expensive, \emph{always-on} sanitization that degrades utility and latency even in benign scenarios. We revisit IPI through an operational causal lens: a successful injection manifests as a \emph{grounding collapse} where the user request no longer provides decisive support for the agent's privileged action, while a particular untrusted segment provides disproportionate marginal support. Based on this signature, we propose \texttt{CausalArmor}, a selective defense framework that (i) computes lightweight, normalized leave-one-out attributions at privileged decision points, and (ii) triggers targeted sanitization only when an untrusted segment dominates the user intent. Additionally, CausalArmor employs \emph{retroactive Chain-of-Thought masking} to prevent the agent from acting on ``poisoned" reasoning traces. Experiments on AgentDojo and DoomArena demonstrate that CausalArmor matches the security of aggressive defenses with explainability while preserving utility and latency of AI agents.
View details
Preview abstract
Validating conversational artificial intelligence (AI) for regulated medical software applications may present challenges, as static test datasets and manual review may be limited in identifying emergent, conversational anomalies. A multi-agent AI system may be configured in a closed-loop for automated validation. The system can, for example, utilize an end user persona simulator agent to generate prompts for a target model and a domain /regulatory expert adjudicator agent to evaluate the target model’s responses against a configurable rubric. A meta-analysis agent can analyze anomalies to identify underlying vulnerabilities, which may then be used to programmatically synthesize new adversarial personas. This adaptive process can generate evidence to support regulatory compliance and continuous performance monitoring for medical software algorithms systems.
View details
Tech Worker Challenges Managing Humanlike GenAI
Eric Corbett
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2026), pp. 1-18
Preview abstract
Organizations are adopting or exploring anthropomorphic genAI — meaning XYZ. Anthropomorphic AI is often held up for its potential to improve the productivity and efficiency of workers and technologies; however, there are not yet accepted industry-wide standards for the responsible development of anthropomorphic technologies. Given their roles as central figures responsible for implementing anthropomorphic genAI into technologies that are served to the broader public, we must understand workers’ reasoning about anthropomorphic genAI to understand its impacts. However, there is a dearth of empirical knowledge about technology workers’ perspectives on anthropomorphic technologies, including their perspectives on potential risks and benefits. To address this gap, we conducted focus groups with 31 technology workers across 6 job roles (UX, software engineers, product managers, designers, marketing, and trust and safety) regarding how they define anthropomorphic genAI, their perceptions of anthropomorphic genAI, and their experiences working with anthropomorphic genAI. We find that workers’ have expansive definitions of what constitutes “humanlike” AI, which at times sit in tension with each other. They draw on their personal and professional standpoints to sensemake about real and possible anthropomorphic genAI hazards to people, knowledge work fields, and society at-large. Importantly, we find that these social hazards map to different facets of anthropomorphic genAI, suggesting that effective mitigation of personal and social risks requires developer attention to specific dimensions of anthropomorphism. We mapped the relationships between dimensions of anthropomorphism and hazards, to support technology workers. We argue that effective mitigation of the risks of anthropomorphism requires attention to the multiple facets of anthropomorphism.
View details
Preview abstract
Voice activity detection (VAD) plays a vital role in enabling applications such as speech recognition. We analyze the impact of window size on the accuracy of three VAD algorithms: Silero, WebRTC, and Root Mean Square (RMS) across a set of diverse real-world digital audio streams. We additionally explore the use of hysteresis on top of each VAD output. Our results offer practical references for optimizing VAD systems. Silero significantly outperforms WebRTC and RMS, and hysteresis provides a benefit for WebRTC.
View details
A Computer Vision Problem in Flatland
Erin Connelly
Annalisa Crannell
Timothy Duff
Rekha R. Thomas
SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry, 10 (2026), pp. 14-45
Preview abstract
When is it possible to project two sets of labeled points of equal cardinality lying in a pair of projective planes to the same image on a projective line? We give a complete answer to this question, obtaining the following results. We first show that such a pair of projections exist if and only if the two point sets are themselves images of a common point set in projective space. Moreover, we find that for generic pairs of point sets, a common projection exists if and only if their cardinality is at most seven. In these cases, we give an explicit description of the loci of projection centers that enable a common image.
View details
