Publications

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

people standing in front of a screen with images and a chipboard

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

Sort By
  • Title
  • Title, descending
  • Year
  • Year, descending
1 - 15 of 11377 publications
Mining Attribute Subspaces for Efficient Fine-tuning of 3D Foundation Models
Yu Jiang
Hanwen Jiang
Vincent Chu
Brandon Y. Feng
Zhangyang Wang
Qixing Huang
IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2026)
Preview abstract With the emergence of 3D foundation models, there is growing interest in fine-tuning them for downstream tasks, where LoRA is the dominant fine-tuning paradigm. As 3D datasets exhibit distinct variations in texture, geometry, camera motion, and lighting, there are interesting fundamental questions: 1) Are there LoRA subspaces associated with each type of variation? 2) Are these subspaces disentangled (i.e., orthogonal to each other)? 3) How do we compute them effectively? This paper provides answers to all these questions. We introduce a robust approach that generates synthetic datasets with controlled variations, fine-tunes a LoRA adapter on each dataset, and extracts a LoRA sub-space associated with each type of variation. We show that these subspaces are approximately disentangled. Integrating them leads to a reduced LoRA subspace that enables efficient LoRA fine-tuning with improved prediction accuracy for downstream tasks. In particular, we show that such a reduced LoRA subspace, despite being derived entirely from synthetic data, generalizes to real datasets. An ablation study validates the effectiveness of the choices in our approach. View details
Preview abstract Autonomous research agents can now produce competitive solutions and complete manuscripts, yet their papers routinely contain fabricated citations, method descriptions disconnected from the code, and scores on incorrect scales---failures invisible to evaluations that assess fluency rather than evidentiary grounding. The core problem is verifiability: no existing system maintains a traceable chain from each claim in the paper to its grounding evidence, and current evaluation protocols assess output fluency rather than evidentiary grounding. We address this with Chaine-of-Evidence (CoE), a verifiability standard requiring every claim to trace to its grounding evidence, and instantiate it in Scientist One, an end-to-end research system that maintains evidence chains natively, and CoE Audit, an evaluation protocol with four integrity checks targeting the most damaging chain failures. Auditing 60 papers from four systems, we find every baseline exhibits at least one failure: phantom citations at 4--25%, method-code alignment in at most 2/15 papers. Scientist One achieves zero phantom citations (0/830), the highest alignment rate (7/15), and competitive solver scores. View details
Preview abstract While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at many tasks, they frequently struggle with complex reasoning that requires long-horizon planning and iterative error correction. Furthermore, standard single-stream prompting proves brittle when models encounter novel abstractions or rigorous domain constraints. We introduce PoTRE (Poly-Topological Reasoning Ensembles), a heterogeneous framework that decouples inference into four agents: (1) Adversarial Refinement Agent, (2) Hierarchical strategic Planning Agent, (3) Spectrum Search Agent, and (4) Direct Chain Agent. A final Task-Adaptive Aggregation Layer dynamically reconciles these perspectives -- via final candidate selection, semantic synthesis, or neuro-symbolic verification -- to produce a robust global solution. We evaluate PoTRE on three frontier benchmarks: ARC-AGI-2, Humanity's Last Exam (HLE), and PRBench Finance. PoTRE achieves state-of-the-art accuracy of 49.92% on HLE, surpassing the previous best official score. We demonstrate that this architectural heterogeneity achieves improved reasoning performance using similar or fewer inference tokens compared to heavily scaled homogeneous baselines. View details
Preview abstract High-volume enterprise service organizations face a persistent challenge in transitioning from reactive support models to proactive, preventative ones. This paper introduces the Agentic Trend-to-Knowledge (ATK) methodology, a novel, autonomous framework designed to address this gap. The ATK methodology employs an AI agent that operates in a recurring, closed loop. It first uses a two-stage process for the autonomous thematic analysis of recent support cases to identify the most significant recurring issue. It then leverages Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to source relevant institutional knowledge. A key innovation is the agent's adaptive, bimodal response: if relevant knowledge is found, it drafts a proactive communication for human review; if a knowledge gap is detected, it autonomously creates a content creation task for the appropriate team. This transforms the agent from an automation tool into a proactive process owner that creates a virtuous cycle of continuous improvement for both case deflection and knowledge base quality. By automating the entire workflow from insight to action, the ATK framework provides a concrete methodology for shifting from a "human-in-the-loop" to a more strategic "human-on-the-loop" operational paradigm. View details
Preview abstract This talk addresses the challenges of operating Google's monitoring systems at scale, handling terabytes of telemetry data and preventing overload from diverse workloads. We'll explore how Google's internal client library and Monarch, its planet-scale time-series database, work together for cost-effective data collection. Key principles include a distributed push model, dynamic client-side data reduction, centralized retention, and periodic metric analysis. The session will then bridge these concepts to the open-source world, discussing our work with OpenTelemetry's OpAMP protocol to achieve similar scalable and efficient telemetry collection. Attendees will gain insights into adapting these principles for cost savings and learn about our collaboration with the OpAMP SIG to benefit the broader community. View details
Marginalized Bundle Adjustment: Multi-View Camera Pose from Monocular Depth Estimates
Shengjie Zhu
Xiaoming Liu
Vincent Chu
International Conference on 3D Vision (2026)
Preview abstract Structure-from-Motion (SfM) is a classical 3D vision task for recovering camera parameters and scene geometry from multi-view images. Recent advances in deep learning enable accurate monocular depth estimation (MDE) that infers structure from a single image without depending on camera motion. But integrating MDE into SfM remains challenging. Unlike classical triangulated sparse pointclouds, MDE produces dense depthmaps with significantly higher error variance. Inspired by modern RANSAC estimators, we propose a Marginalized Bundle Adjustment (MBA) to accommodate MDE error variance with its density. With MBA, we show that MDE depthmaps are sufficiently accurate to support SoTA or competitive results in Structure-from-Motion and camera relocalization. Our benchmark demonstrates consistent remarkable results from two-view, few-frames small multiview, to thousands-frames large multiview system. Our method highlights the significant potential of MDE on multi-view 3D vision tasks. View details
Preview abstract Artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving, marked by the emergence of Large Language Model (LLM) agents – systems capable of complex reasoning, planning, and interaction with digital and physical environments. These agents, powered by advancements in LLMs, demonstrate remarkable capabilities across diverse domains, including finance, healthcare, web navigation, software development, and daily task assistance. Unlike traditional AI systems, LLM agents can perceive their surroundings, formulate multi-step plans, utilize external tools and APIs, access memory or knowledge bases, and execute actions to achieve specified goals. This ability to act upon the world, however, introduces significant safety and security challenges. The safety paradigms developed for traditional LLMs, primarily focused on mitigating harmful textual outputs (e.g., toxicity, bias), are insufficient for safeguarding LLM agents. Agents interacting with dynamic environments and executing actions present a broader attack surface and new categories of risk. These include performing unsafe operations, violating privacy constraints through improper data handling or access control failures, deviating from user objectives (task misalignment), and susceptibility to novel manipulation techniques like indirect prompt injection and memory poisoning. Ensuring the trustworthy operation of these powerful agents is paramount, especially as they are integrated into high-stakes applications. To address this critical challenge, we introduce VeriGuard, a novel framework designed to enhance the safety and reliability of LLM agents by interactively verifying their policies and the actions. VeriGuard integrates a verification module that intercepts code-based actions proposed by the agent. In the first step, VeriGuard will generates and verifies the policies. The policies are rigorously checked against a set of predefined safety and security specifications Then each action will be verified to make sure it will align with the agent specification. This interactive verification loop ensures that the agent's behavior remains within safe operational bounds, effectively preventing the execution of harmful or unintended operations. By verifying each step, VeriGuard provides a robust safeguard, substantially improving the trustworthiness of LLM agents in complex, real-world environments. View details
Preview abstract We study the d-dimensional knapsack problem. We are given a set of items, each with a d-dimensional cost vector and a profit, along with a d-dimensional budget vector. The goal is to select a set of items that do not exceed the budget in all dimensions and maximize the total profit. A polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) with running time n^{Θ(d/{ε})} has long been known for this problem, where {ε} is the error parameter and n is the encoding size. Despite decades of active research, the best running time of a PTAS has remained O(n^{⌈ d/{ε} ⌉ - d}). Unfortunately, existing lower bounds only cover the special case with two dimensions d = 2, and do not answer whether there is a n^{o(d/({ε)})}-time PTAS for larger values of d. In this work, we show that the running times of the best-known PTAS cannot be improved up to a polylogarithmic factor assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Our techniques are based on a robust reduction from 2-CSP, which embeds 2-CSP constraints into a desired number of dimensions. Then, using a recent result of [Bafna Karthik and Minzer, STOC'25], we succeed in exhibiting tight trade-off between d and {ε} for all regimes of the parameters assuming d is sufficiently large. Informally, our result also shows that under ETH, for any function f there is no f(d/({ε)}) ⋅ n^{õ(d/({ε)})}-time (1-{ε})-approximation for d-dimensional knapsack, where n is the number of items and õ hides polylogarithmic factors in d/({ε)}. View details
Diffusion Controller: Framework, Algorithms and Parameterization
Tong Yang
Moonkyung Ryu
Guy Tennenholtz
Yuejie Chi
Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-26), Seoul, South Korea (2026)
Preview abstract Controllable generation with diffusion models is often treated as a collection of heuristics rather than a unified optimization problem. We propose a principled control formulation by viewing the diffusion reverse process as an instance of a (generalized) linearly-solvable Markov decision process (LS-MDP). This perspective turns controllable generation into regularized optimal control around a pretrained diffusion policy, yielding tractable objectives and algorithmic updates. Under this framework, we study two practical finetuning regimes. When paired target data are available, we obtain a supervised finetuning (SFT) objective. When only a terminal reward model is available, we derive reinforcement-learning finetuning (RLFT) methods from the LS-MDP solution structure, including (i) a reward-weighted regression loss and (ii) a policy-gradient approach (with standard extensions such as PPO). Crucially, the LS-MDP optimality conditions imply an explicit relationship between the optimal and pretrained score functions. We leverage this to derive a new score-function parameterization that isolates the control signal and enables “gray-box” finetuning with substantially fewer trainable parameters. Experiments across SFT and RLFT show this parameterization improves over existing finetuning baselines while achieving stronger sample/parameter efficiency. View details
Preview abstract AI agents equipped with tool-calling capabilities are susceptible to \emph{Indirect Prompt Injection} (IPI) attacks. In this attack scenario, malicious commands hidden within \emph{untrusted} content trick the agent into performing unauthorized actions. Existing defenses can reduce attack success but often suffer from the \emph{over-defense dilemma}: they deploy expensive, \emph{always-on} sanitization that degrades utility and latency even in benign scenarios. We revisit IPI through an operational causal lens: a successful injection manifests as a \emph{grounding collapse} where the user request no longer provides decisive support for the agent's privileged action, while a particular untrusted segment provides disproportionate marginal support. Based on this signature, we propose \texttt{CausalArmor}, a selective defense framework that (i) computes lightweight, normalized leave-one-out attributions at privileged decision points, and (ii) triggers targeted sanitization only when an untrusted segment dominates the user intent. Additionally, CausalArmor employs \emph{retroactive Chain-of-Thought masking} to prevent the agent from acting on ``poisoned" reasoning traces. Experiments on AgentDojo and DoomArena demonstrate that CausalArmor matches the security of aggressive defenses with explainability while preserving utility and latency of AI agents. View details
Towards A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Reliable Patch Evaluation using an LLM-as-a-Judge
Renyao Wei
Michele Tufano
José Cambronero
AI-SQE '26: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on AI for Software Quality Evaluation - Judgment, Metrics, Benchmarks, and Beyond, ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), New York, NY, USA (2026), pp. 19 - 28
Preview abstract Reliable evaluation is crucial for advancing Automated Program Repair (APR), but prevailing benchmarks that rely on execution-based evaluation methods (pass@k) often fail to capture the patch quality required for real-world adoption. This creates a significant gap between automated metrics and true patch validity (valid@k), a discrepancy observed across several state-of-the-art techniques. To develop a scalable solution for measuring valid@k, we first study the human evaluation process itself. While manual assessment can determine validity, we find it suffers from poor inter-rater reliability (Fleiss' Kappa k=0.307). Our foundational insight is that this inconsistency is largely resolved when evaluators use a shared, high-quality rubric, which significantly improves agreement. Building on this finding, we propose an LLM-as-a-Judge framework that operationalizes rubric-guided evaluation at scale. Our method employs a human-in-the-loop workflow where an LLM first generates a candidate rubric for a given bug, which a human expert then reviews and refines into a "golden" evaluation standard. This golden rubric is then used by an LLM judge to assess the validity of candidate patches. In an evaluation on 48 bugs and 115 patches, our LLM judge demonstrates substantial agreement with the consensus of human developers. This work contributes a scalable and reliable methodology for approximating valid@k, providing a much-needed high-fidelity signal for measuring true progress in the field of automated program repair. View details
An Empirical Study of Tablet Ergonomics: The Interplay of Temperature, Orientation, and Use Behaviors
Carmen Van Ommen
Mikki Phan
Arun Raghupathy
Daniel Huynh
Barbara Chaparro
Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications Journal (2026)
Preview abstract To balance computational performance with thermal comfort, this study explores a consolidated hotspot architecture at the top center of a tablet. We tested hotspot (39°C, 43°C, 45°C, 47°C) and ambient temperatures (25°C, 35°C) with 60 participants, measuring perception, action likelihood, and expectation. The hotspot was observed away from high contact areas, with 43°C identified as the threshold for significant discomfort. Discomfort increased with portrait mode use and higher device and ambient temperatures, while active use duration influenced acceptability. The findings underscore the importance of thermal mapping and contextual sensing, with direct applications for software throttling thresholds of coated aluminum enclosures. View details
Preview abstract Some artificial intelligence provisioning models that function as tools for human users or rely on labor arbitrage can present challenges for organizations, such as managing personnel rather than task outcomes and introducing data security risks. An architecture is described for an outcome-based synthetic labor market in which autonomous computational agents can be compensated based on verified task completion. The framework can leverage trusted execution environments to create secure hardware enclaves for processing sensitive data, which can render the data cryptographically inaccessible to a host system or agent provider. This approach can facilitate a secure, transactional market for autonomous professional execution, which may enable a shift from managing labor resources to procuring verified outcomes from a pool of specialized agents. View details
Preview abstract Standard evaluations of backdoor attacks on text-to-image (T2I) models primarily measure trigger activation and visual fidelity. We challenge this paradigm, demonstrating that encoder-side poisoning induces persistent, trigger-free semantic corruption that fundamentally reshapes the representation manifold. We trace this vulnerability to a geometric mechanism: a Jacobian-based analysis reveals that backdoors act as low-rank, target-centered deformations that amplify local sensitivity, causing distortion to propagate coherently across semantic neighborhoods. To rigorously quantify this structural degradation, we introduce SEMAD (Semantic Alignment and Drift), a diagnostic framework that measures both internal embedding drift and downstream functional misalignment. Our findings, validated across diffusion and contrastive paradigms, expose the deep structural risks of encoder poisoning and highlight the necessity of geometric audits beyond simple attack success rates. View details
Preview abstract Systems for escalating interactions from automated agents to human agents can create inefficiencies, for example, by transferring unstructured transcripts. An intermediary system can employ a generative artificial intelligence synthesis engine to process the context of an automated interaction upon an escalation trigger. The engine may analyze the dialogue transcript, user metadata, and the automated agent's internal state to perform semantic abstraction, diagnose potential failure points, and infer a possible resolution. The system can then generate a structured briefing for the human agent, which could include a concise summary, a failure diagnosis, or a recommended next action presented as an interactive element. This process may facilitate a more efficient handoff and contribute to an improved escalation workflow by providing the human agent with synthesized, contextual information. View details
×