Publications
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Sort By
1 - 15 of 11370 publications
A Dynamic Numerical Model for Real-Time Estimation of Latent Cognitive States Using Oculomotor Metrics
Diako Mardanbegi
ICASSP 2026-2026 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 22087-22091
Preview abstract
Estimating internal cognitive states from oculomotor data is fundamentally challenging due to their context-dependency and the complex relationship between various metrics. This paper proposes a dynamic numerical framework to model a task-specific behavioral signature and monitor deviations from it in real-time. The model integrates key oculomotor and motion metrics into a differential equation, yielding a continuous score that serves as an estimate of a latent cognitive state. By using tunable, heuristic parameters, our approach offers a transparent and adaptable alternative to opaque machine learning models. The framework’s strength lies in its ability to pinpoint objective changes in behavior, providing a potential tool for interpreting events like the onset of fatigue, distraction, or cognitive load.
View details
The Perfection Paradox: From Architect to Curator in AI-Assisted API Design
JJ Geewax
David R Karger
Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '26), ACM, Barcelona, Spain, TBD
Preview abstract
Enterprise API design is often bottlenecked by the tension between rapid feature delivery and the rigorous maintenance of usability standards. We present an industrial case study evaluating an AI-assisted design workflow trained on API Improvement Proposals(AIPs). Through a controlled study with 16 industry experts, we compared AI-generated API specifications against human-authored ones. While quantitative results indicated AI superiority in 10 of 11 usability dimensions and an 87% reduction in authoring time, qualitative analysis revealed a paradox: experts frequently misidentified AI work as human (19% accuracy) yet described the designs as unsettlingly “perfect.” We characterize this as a “Perfection Paradox”—where hyper-consistency signals a lack of pragmatic human judgment. We discuss the implications of this perfection paradox, proposing a shift in the human designer’s role from the “drafter” of specifications to the “curator” of AI-generated patterns.
View details
MoXaRt: Audio-Visual Object-Guided Sound Interaction for XR
Sieun Kim
Qianhui Zheng
Ruoyu Xu
Ravi Tejasvi
Anuva Kulkarni
Junyi Zhu
2026
Preview abstract
In Extended Reality (XR), complex acoustic environments often overwhelm users, compromising both scene awareness and social engagement due to entangled sound sources. We introduce MoXaRt, a real-time XR system that uses audio-visual cues to separate these sources and enable fine-grained sound interaction. MoXaRt's core is a cascaded architecture that performs coarse, audio-only separation in parallel with visual detection of sources (e.g. faces, instruments). These visual anchors then guide refinement networks to isolate individual sources, separating complex mixes of up to five concurrent sources (e.g. two voices + three instruments) with ca. 2 second processing latency. We validate MoXaRt through a technical evaluation on a new, complex dataset we collected, and a 22-participant user study. Our results demonstrate that MoXaRt significantly improves communication clarity—boosting listening comprehension in noisy conditions by 33.2% (p=0.0058)—and significantly reduces cognitive load (M=7.50 vs. M=3.36, p<0.001), paving the way for more perceptive and socially adept XR experiences.
View details
Preview abstract
While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at many tasks, they frequently struggle with complex reasoning that requires long-horizon planning and iterative error correction. Furthermore, standard single-stream prompting proves brittle when models encounter novel abstractions or rigorous domain constraints. We introduce PoTRE (Poly-Topological Reasoning Ensembles), a heterogeneous framework that decouples inference into four agents: (1) Adversarial Refinement Agent, (2) Hierarchical strategic Planning Agent, (3) Spectrum Search Agent, and (4) Direct Chain Agent. A final Task-Adaptive Aggregation Layer dynamically reconciles these perspectives -- via final candidate selection, semantic synthesis, or neuro-symbolic verification -- to produce a robust global solution. We evaluate PoTRE on three frontier benchmarks: ARC-AGI-2, Humanity's Last Exam (HLE), and PRBench Finance. PoTRE achieves state-of-the-art accuracy of 49.92% on HLE, surpassing the previous best official score. We demonstrate that this architectural heterogeneity achieves improved reasoning performance using similar or fewer inference tokens compared to heavily scaled homogeneous baselines.
View details
Digital Shadow AI Risk Theoretical Framework (DART): A Framework for Managing Data Disclosure and Privacy Risks of AI tools at Work
Master's Thesis (2026)
Preview abstract
The accelerated integration of generative AI technologies and agentic AI tools, particularly those like ChatGPT, into workplace settings has introduced complex challenges concerning data governance, regulatory compliance, and organizational privacy (GDPR 2016; CCPA/CPRA). This study introduces the Digital Shadow AI Risk Theoretical Framework (DART)—a novel theoretical framework designed to systematically identify, classify, and address the latent risks arising from the widespread, and often unregulated, use of AI systems in professional environments (NIST, 2023; OECD AI Policy Observatory, 2023). DART introduces six original, interrelated constructs developed in this study: Unintentional Disclosure Risk, Trust-Dependence Paradox, Data Sovereignty Conflict, Knowledge Dilution Phenomenon, Ethical Black Box Problem, and Organizational Feedback Loops. Each construct reflects a unique dimension of risk that emerges as organizations increasingly rely on AI-driven tools for knowledge work and decision-making.
The framework is empirically tested through a mixed-methods research design involving hypothesis testing and statistical analysis of behavioral data gathered from cross-sectional surveys of industry professionals. Two cross-industry surveys (Survey-1: 416 responses, 374 analyzed; Survey-2: 203 responses, 179 analyzed) and CB-SEM tests supported seven of eight hypotheses; H4 (sovereignty) was not significant; H7 (knowledge dilution) was confirmed in replication. The findings highlight critical gaps in employee training, policy awareness, and risk mitigation strategies—underscoring the urgent need for updated governance frameworks, comprehensive AI-use policies, and targeted educational interventions. This paper contributes to emerging scholarship by offering a robust model for understanding and mitigating digital risks in AI-enabled workplaces, providing practical implications for compliance officers, risk managers, and organizational leaders aiming to harness the benefits of generative AI responsibly and securely. The novelty of DART lies in its explicit theorization of workplace-level behavioral risks—especially Shadow AI, which unlike Shadow IT externalizes organizational knowledge into adaptive systems—thereby offering a unified framework that bridges fragmented literatures and grounds them in empirical evidence.
View details
Preview abstract
Generative AI’s humanlike qualities are driving its rapid adoption in professional domains. However, this anthropomorphic appeal raises concerns from HCI and responsible AI scholars about potential hazards and harms, such as overtrust in system outputs. To investigate how technology workers navigate these humanlike qualities and anticipate emergent harms, we conducted focus groups with 30 professionals across six job functions (ML engineering, product policy, UX research and design, product management, technology writing, and communications). Our findings reveal an unsettled knowledge environment surrounding humanlike generative AI, where workers’ varying perspectives illuminate a range of potential risks for individuals, knowledge work fields, and society. We argue that workers require comprehensive support, including clearer conceptions of “humanlikeness” to effectively mitigate these risks. To aid in mitigation strategies, we provide a conceptual map articulating the identified hazards and their connection to conflated notions of “humanlikeness.”
View details
Preview abstract
Automating AI research differs from general software engineering due to computationally expensive evaluation (e.g., model training) and opaque performance attribution. Current LLM-based agents struggle here, often generating monolithic scripts that ignore execution costs and causal factors. We introduce MARS (Modular Agent with Reflective Search), a framework optimized for autonomous AI research. MARS relies on three pillars: (1) Budget-Aware Planning via cost-constrained Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to explicitly balance performance with execution expense; (2) Modular Construction, employing a "Design-Decompose-Implement" pipeline to manage complex research repositories; and (3) Comparative Reflective Memory, which addresses credit assignment by analyzing solution differences to distill high-signal insights. MARS achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source frameworks on MLE-Bench under comparable settings, maintaining competitiveness with the global leaderboard's top methods. Furthermore, the system exhibits qualitative "Aha!" moments, where 63% of all utilized lessons originate from cross-branch transfer, demonstrating that the agent effectively generalizes insights across search paths.
View details
Preview abstract
Source-to-source compilers may perform inefficiently by executing transpilation passes on scripts that do not contain the specific language features a pass is designed to transform, potentially leading to redundant processing. A compiler can analyze a script to generate a per-script feature map, for example, by identifying language features in its abstract syntax tree (AST). Before executing a transpilation pass, the compiler can check this map and may bypass the pass for that script if the specific feature targeted by the pass is not present. This feature map can also be dynamically updated throughout the compilation process as other passes transform the code. This method of conditional pass execution based on content-aware analysis may reduce redundant AST traversals, which could decrease overall compilation time and computational resource consumption.
View details
Improving Low-Vision Chart Accessibility via On-Cursor Visual Context
Yotam Sechayk
Hennes Rave
Max Radler
Mark Colley
Ariel Shamir
Takeo Igarashi
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 26)
Preview abstract
Despite widespread use, charts remain largely inaccessible for Low-Vision Individuals (LVI). Reading charts requires viewing data points within a global context, which is difficult for LVI who may rely on magnification or experience a partial field of vision. We aim to improve exploration by providing visual access to critical context. To inform this, we conducted a formative study with five LVI. We identified four fundamental contextual elements common across chart types: axes, legend, grid lines, and the overview. We propose two pointer-based interaction methods to provide this context: Dynamic Context, a novel focus+context interaction, and Mini-map, which adapts overview+detail principles for LVI. In a study with N=22 LVI, we compared both methods and evaluated their integration to current tools. Our results show that Dynamic Context had significant positive impact on access, usability, and effort reduction; however, worsened visual load. Mini-map strengthened spatial understanding, but was less preferred for this task. We offer design insights to guide the development of future systems that support LVI with visual context while balancing visual load.
View details
Preview abstract
When managing complex, unpredictable (non-deterministic) AI agents using simple, fixed control systems (like finite state machines), operational failures and accountability issues often arise. This document introduces a probabilistic governance and telemetry framework to resolve these problems. Instead of following a rigid sequence of steps, this framework defines a multi-dimensional operational boundary, a 'behavioral volume', and assigns the agent a goal. This allows the agent to use its own reasoning to achieve the goal while remaining within the defined boundaries. A separate telemetry layer monitors the agent's actions by calculating metrics, such as alignment scores and drift velocity, to measure how much the agent deviates from its intended behavior. This system provides a method for guiding, monitoring, and securing autonomous agents, effectively managing the performance and security of an unpredictable AI workforce in complex environments.
View details
Preview abstract
Mid-air gestures in Extended Reality (XR) often lead to fatigue, discomfort and imprecision, limiting their suitability for extended use. Surface-based interactions offer a compelling alternative, providing improved accuracy, speed, and comfort. However, current egocentric vision-based methods struggle with reliable surface inputs due to challenges in hand tracking and surface-plane estimation from oblique and occluded viewing angles. To this extent, we introduce SurfaceXR, a novel sensor fusion approach that combines headset based hand tracking with micro-vibration data sampled from commodity smartwatch IMUs to enable precise and robust inputs on arbitrary surfaces. Our system is designed with flexibility in mind - it can function using only hand tracking, only IMU sensing, or optimally with both modalities combined. Our user study across 12 participants validates SurfaceXR's effectiveness in augmenting surface touch tracking and 8 class hand-surface gesture recognition, demonstrating significant improvements over single-modality approaches. Enabled by SurfaceXR, we demonstrate a series of interactive apps for both AR and VR, ranging from on-surface sketching, text entry and gesture based navigation.
View details
ALF: Advertiser Large Foundation Model for Multi-Modal Advertiser Understanding
Sunny Rajagopalan
Alireza Golestaneh
Shubhra Chandra
Min Zhou
Jonathan Vronsky
Songbai Yan
2026
Preview abstract
We present ALF (Advertiser Large Foundation model), a multi-modal transformer architecture for understanding advertiser behavior and intent across text, image, video and structured data modalities. Through contrastive learning and multi-task optimization, ALF creates unified advertiser representations that capture both content and behavioral patterns. Our model achieves state-of-the-art performance on critical tasks including fraud detection, policy violation identification, and advertiser similarity matching. In production deployment, ALF reduces false positives by 90\% while maintaining 99.8\% precision on abuse detection tasks. The architecture's effectiveness stems from its novel combination of multi-modal transformations, intersample attention mechanism, spectrally normalized projections, and calibrated probabilistic outputs.
View details
Preview abstract
The field of Human-Computer Interaction is approaching a critical inflection point, moving beyond the era of static, deterministic systems into a new age of self-evolving systems. We introduce the concept of Adaptive generative interfaces that move beyond static artifacts to autonomously expand their own feature sets at runtime. Rather than relying on fixed layouts, these systems utilize generative methods to morph and grow in real-time based on a user’s immediate intent. The system operates through three core mechanisms: Directed synthesis (generating new features from direct commands), Inferred synthesis (generating new features for unmet needs via inferred commands), and Real-time adaptation (dynamically restructuring the interface's visual and functional properties at runtime). To empirically validate this paradigm, we executed a within-subject (repeated measures) comparative study (N=72) utilizing 'Penny,' a digital banking prototype. The experimental design employed a counterbalanced Latin Square approach to mitigate order effects, such as learning bias and fatigue, while comparing Deterministic interfaces baseline against an Adaptive generative interfaces. Participant performance was verified through objective screen-capture evidence, with perceived usability quantified using the industry-standard System Usability Scale (SUS). The results demonstrated a profound shift in user experience: the Adaptive generative version achieved a System Usability Scale (SUS) score of 84.38 ('Excellent'), significantly outperforming the Deterministic version’s score of 53.96 ('Poor'). With a statistically significant mean difference of 30.42 points (p < 0.0001) and a large effect size (d=1.04), these findings confirm that reducing 'navigation tax' through adaptive generative interfaces directly correlates with a substantial increase in perceived usability. We conclude that deterministic interfaces are no longer sufficient to manage the complexity of modern workflows. The future of software lies not in a fixed set of pre-shipped features, but in dynamic capability sets that grow, adapt, and restructure themselves in real-time to meet the specific intent of the user. This paradigm shift necessitates a fundamental transformation in product development, requiring designers to transcend traditional, linear workflows and evolve into 'System Builders'—architects of the design principles and rules that facilitate this new age of self-evolving software.
View details
Tech Worker Challenges Managing Humanlike GenAI
Eric Corbett
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2026), pp. 1-18
Preview abstract
Organizations are adopting or exploring anthropomorphic genAI — meaning XYZ. Anthropomorphic AI is often held up for its potential to improve the productivity and efficiency of workers and technologies; however, there are not yet accepted industry-wide standards for the responsible development of anthropomorphic technologies. Given their roles as central figures responsible for implementing anthropomorphic genAI into technologies that are served to the broader public, we must understand workers’ reasoning about anthropomorphic genAI to understand its impacts. However, there is a dearth of empirical knowledge about technology workers’ perspectives on anthropomorphic technologies, including their perspectives on potential risks and benefits. To address this gap, we conducted focus groups with 31 technology workers across 6 job roles (UX, software engineers, product managers, designers, marketing, and trust and safety) regarding how they define anthropomorphic genAI, their perceptions of anthropomorphic genAI, and their experiences working with anthropomorphic genAI. We find that workers’ have expansive definitions of what constitutes “humanlike” AI, which at times sit in tension with each other. They draw on their personal and professional standpoints to sensemake about real and possible anthropomorphic genAI hazards to people, knowledge work fields, and society at-large. Importantly, we find that these social hazards map to different facets of anthropomorphic genAI, suggesting that effective mitigation of personal and social risks requires developer attention to specific dimensions of anthropomorphism. We mapped the relationships between dimensions of anthropomorphism and hazards, to support technology workers. We argue that effective mitigation of the risks of anthropomorphism requires attention to the multiple facets of anthropomorphism.
View details
Preview abstract
In today's AI landscape, success depends not just on prompting large language models but on orchestrating them into intelligent systems that are scalable, compliant, and cost-effective. GenAI on Google Cloud is your hands-on guide to bridging that gap. Whether you're an ML engineer or an enterprise leader, this book offers a practical game plan for taking agentic systems from prototype to production.
Written by practitioners with deep experience in AgentOps, data engineering, and GenAI infrastructure, this guide takes you through real-world workflows from data prep and deployment to orchestration and integration. With concrete examples, field-tested frameworks, and honest insights, you'll learn how to build agentic systems that deliver measurable business value.
> Bridge the production gap that stalls 90% of vertical AI initiatives using systematic deployment frameworks
> Navigate AgentOps complexities through practical guidance on orchestration, evaluation, and responsible AI practices
> Build robust multimodal systems for text, images, and video using proven agent architectures
> Optimize for scale with strategies for cost management, performance tuning, and production monitoring
View details
