Are Pretrained Convolutions Better than Pretrained Transformers?
Abstract
In the era of pretrained language models, transformers are the defacto choice of model architectures. While recent works have shown promise in entirely convolutional based architectures, these CNN-based models have not been widely adopted or evaluated under the pretrain-finetune paradigm.
In the context of language models, are convolutional models competitive when pretrained?
This paper investigates this research question and presents several interesting findings. Across a set of extensive experiments, our findings show that CNN-based pretrained models are highly competitive and outperform Transformer-based pretrained models in certain scenarios, albeit with caveats. Overall, the findings of this paper should implore the broader academic community to perhaps not conflate pretraining advances with architectural advances and both set of techniques could be studied in isolation.
In the context of language models, are convolutional models competitive when pretrained?
This paper investigates this research question and presents several interesting findings. Across a set of extensive experiments, our findings show that CNN-based pretrained models are highly competitive and outperform Transformer-based pretrained models in certain scenarios, albeit with caveats. Overall, the findings of this paper should implore the broader academic community to perhaps not conflate pretraining advances with architectural advances and both set of techniques could be studied in isolation.
Research Areas
