Publications
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Sort By
1 - 15 of 11426 publications
When Android Apps Request Location with a Reason: A Developer Study and User Behavior Experiment
May Smith
Aman Jain
Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (2027)
Preview abstract
Recent reports have highlighted how mobile apps share user location data with third parties, risking user privacy and platform trust. Although location data is highly sensitive, when users grant apps location access, they may not know the full extent to which it is used. We study how requiring Android apps to show a reason for location access could impact developers, users, and the platform.
We surveyed 323 Android app developers and found most supported such a requirement. The majority said it would have a positive impact on user privacy, trust for apps, and trust for Android, where impact on user trust for Android correlated most strongly with support. Many developers also said the intervention would increase the number of users granting location access. Yet their open-ended comments also revealed consistent concerns, such as apps providing dishonest reasons and platform verification.
To study the impact on user behavior, we conducted a randomized controlled experiment with 2579 US Android users. We tested how users' decisions to grant location access were impacted by app type, whether reasons were included in the requests, and the content of the reasons, including monetization. We did not find the reasons impacted users' decisions; decisions were instead driven by app type and demographics. Yet we did find the reasons could have a positive impact on user perception for the platform when the reasons did not include using data for ads. Our findings provide insights into developers' willingness to implement privacy-enhancing changes, and expose limits to improving user privacy by simply adding information to user interfaces.
View details
MoXaRt: Audio-Visual Object-Guided Sound Interaction for XR
Sieun Kim
Qianhui Zheng
Ruoyu Xu
Ravi Tejasvi
Anuva Kulkarni
Junyi Zhu
2026
Preview abstract
In Extended Reality (XR), complex acoustic environments often overwhelm users, compromising both scene awareness and social engagement due to entangled sound sources. We introduce MoXaRt, a real-time XR system that uses audio-visual cues to separate these sources and enable fine-grained sound interaction. MoXaRt's core is a cascaded architecture that performs coarse, audio-only separation in parallel with visual detection of sources (e.g. faces, instruments). These visual anchors then guide refinement networks to isolate individual sources, separating complex mixes of up to five concurrent sources (e.g. two voices + three instruments) with ca. 2 second processing latency. We validate MoXaRt through a technical evaluation on a new, complex dataset we collected, and a 22-participant user study. Our results demonstrate that MoXaRt significantly improves communication clarity—boosting listening comprehension in noisy conditions by 33.2% (p=0.0058)—and significantly reduces cognitive load (M=7.50 vs. M=3.36, p<0.001), paving the way for more perceptive and socially adept XR experiences.
View details
How Tech Workers Contend with Hazards of Humanlikeness in Generative AI
Eric Corbett
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2026), pp. 1-18
Preview abstract
Generative AI’s humanlike qualities are driving its rapid adoption in professional domains. However, this anthropomorphic appeal raises concerns from HCI and responsible AI scholars about potential hazards and harms, such as overtrust in system outputs. To investigate how technology workers navigate these humanlike qualities and anticipate emergent harms, we conducted focus groups with 30 professionals across six job functions (ML engineering, product policy, UX research and design, product management, technology writing, and communications). Our findings reveal an unsettled knowledge environment surrounding humanlike generative AI, where workers’ varying perspectives illuminate a range of potential risks for individuals, knowledge work fields, and society. We argue that workers require comprehensive support, including clearer conceptions of “humanlikeness” to effectively mitigate these risks. To aid in mitigation strategies, we provide a conceptual map articulating the identified hazards and their connection to conflated notions of “humanlikeness.”
View details
Preview abstract
This article delves into how Google Site Reliability Engineers (SREs) leverage Gemini 3 and the Gemini CLI to aggressively reduce Mean Time to Mitigation (MTTM) during real-world outages. By focusing on the SRE motto of "Eliminate Toil," the article walks through a simulated incident, demonstrating how an agentic CLI acts as a human-in-the-loop copilot across the entire incident lifecycle: from initial paging and investigation, through safe, tool-driven mitigation and root cause analysis, to automated postmortem generation and action item filing. This direct integration of Gemini's reasoning capabilities with operational data and internal tools creates a virtuous cycle where past incident learnings continuously inform and improve future solutions.
View details
Preview abstract
As the ECMAScript specification evolves, industrial-scale JavaScript compilers face the challenge of supporting modern language syntax while maintaining compatibility for diverse execution environments. Traditionally, compilers solve this by running transpilation passes in a monolithic pipeline, where the transpilation passes are chosen to execute strictly based on a target language level. This results in significant computational waste, as compilers perform expensive Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) traversals to lower features that may not exist in the actual input source code. We present a static analysis improvement that conditionally executes transpiler passes based on accurately tracking and dynamically maintaining the exact set of language features seen in the compilation unit throughout the transpilation process. It is implemented in the production Google Closure Compiler. By populating and maintaining a FeatureSet at every JavaScript script-level, it dynamically skips running the unnecessary lowering passes. We detail the architectural safeguards - including strategic pass ordering and dynamic validation of the transpiled code for feature-correctness. Evaluation of this improvement on large-scale production applications produced a considerable reduction in compilation time and saved compute and memory usage.
View details
Pixel Watch: Robust Heart Rate Sensing from Multipath PPG and On-Device Deep Learning Trained on 10,000 hours of Free-Living and Fitness Data
Megan Walker
Yojan Patel
Shyam Tailor
Matt Wimmer
Brennan Garrett
Dan Howe
Hamed Vavadi
Tien Le
Steve Diamond
Oleksiy Vyalov
Vik Sharma
Pete Richards
Tracy Giest
Erika Siegel
Tuan Phan
Sam Mravca
Derrick Vickers
Benjamin Stone
Justin Phillips
YongSuk Cho
Stefanie Hollidge
Antony Siahaan
Soren Brage
Shwetak Patel
Robert Harle
IEEE Sensors Letters (2026)
Preview abstract
The Pixel Watch 2 (PW2) is the first Google smartwatch to combine multipath photoplethysmography (PPG) with deep learning-based heart rate inference, designed to significantly improve sensing accuracy during motion-heavy activities. The device processes 10 optical channels using an on-device, 15-layer temporally dilated convolutional neural network (~300K parameters) to yield a 1 Hz heart rate output. Crucial to this model's performance was its training on a massive dataset comprising 10,000 hours of data from 962 participants, curated from a broader corpus of controlled and free-living activities. We evaluated the PW2's sensing performance across two independent validation sets: an in-house fitness dataset (229 participants, 250 hours) and an external free-living dataset (27 participants, 1000+ hours). The system achieved 95% Limits of Agreement of -10.34 to 8.66 BPM during exercise and -6.57 to 7.48 BPM during free-living activities, demonstrating substantially tighter error margins than previous Google devices. Finally, we discuss key design lessons, emphasizing that large-scale deep learning was instrumental in fully leveraging multipath PPG hardware over traditional signal processing approaches.
View details
Digital Shadow AI Risk Theoretical Framework (DART): A Framework for Managing Data Disclosure and Privacy Risks of AI tools at Work
Master's Thesis (2026)
Preview abstract
The accelerated integration of generative AI technologies and agentic AI tools, particularly those like ChatGPT, into workplace settings has introduced complex challenges concerning data governance, regulatory compliance, and organizational privacy (GDPR 2016; CCPA/CPRA). This study introduces the Digital Shadow AI Risk Theoretical Framework (DART)—a novel theoretical framework designed to systematically identify, classify, and address the latent risks arising from the widespread, and often unregulated, use of AI systems in professional environments (NIST, 2023; OECD AI Policy Observatory, 2023). DART introduces six original, interrelated constructs developed in this study: Unintentional Disclosure Risk, Trust-Dependence Paradox, Data Sovereignty Conflict, Knowledge Dilution Phenomenon, Ethical Black Box Problem, and Organizational Feedback Loops. Each construct reflects a unique dimension of risk that emerges as organizations increasingly rely on AI-driven tools for knowledge work and decision-making.
The framework is empirically tested through a mixed-methods research design involving hypothesis testing and statistical analysis of behavioral data gathered from cross-sectional surveys of industry professionals. Two cross-industry surveys (Survey-1: 416 responses, 374 analyzed; Survey-2: 203 responses, 179 analyzed) and CB-SEM tests supported seven of eight hypotheses; H4 (sovereignty) was not significant; H7 (knowledge dilution) was confirmed in replication. The findings highlight critical gaps in employee training, policy awareness, and risk mitigation strategies—underscoring the urgent need for updated governance frameworks, comprehensive AI-use policies, and targeted educational interventions. This paper contributes to emerging scholarship by offering a robust model for understanding and mitigating digital risks in AI-enabled workplaces, providing practical implications for compliance officers, risk managers, and organizational leaders aiming to harness the benefits of generative AI responsibly and securely. The novelty of DART lies in its explicit theorization of workplace-level behavioral risks—especially Shadow AI, which unlike Shadow IT externalizes organizational knowledge into adaptive systems—thereby offering a unified framework that bridges fragmented literatures and grounds them in empirical evidence.
View details
Preview abstract
We prove the following asymptotically tight lower bound for k-color discrepancy: For any k ≥ 2, there exists a hypergraph with n vertices such that its k-color discrepancy is at least Ω(√n). This improves on the previously known lower bound of Ω(√n/ log k) due to Caragiannis et al. [CLS25]. As an application, we show that our result implies improved lower bounds for group fair division.
View details
Phoenix: Rowhammer Attacks on DDR5 with Self-Correcting Synchronization
Michele Marazzi
Kaveh Razavi
Salman Qazi
Diego Meyer
Patrick Jattke
IEEE Security & Privacy (S&P) (2026)
Preview abstract
In "Elephants, Goldfish and the New Golden Age of Software Engineering," the author discusses how AI is changing knowledge work, especially software development. Written from the perspective of April 2026, the article points out that while AI speeds up coding, it can also quickly generate a lot of mistakes and messy code if it isn't carefully managed by human oversight and clear processes.
The paper outlines a practical approach to working with AI, broken down into three main sections:
Using AI as a Tool, Not a Toy:
The author notes that people often get poor results by asking AI to do everything in a single prompt. Instead, users should have back-and-forth conversations with AI to question assumptions, set clear grading rules, and guide the research. The main point is that humans must still provide the final judgment; AI is simply a way to speed up and record that thinking.
The Elephant-Goldfish Model:
As AI creates more code than humans can easily read, written design documents become more important than the code itself. To keep AI on track, the author suggests a two-part method:
* The Elephant: A long chat session where the human and AI discuss ideas and write a detailed design document *before* any code is written. This session holds all of the project's background information and decisions.
* The Goldfish: A brand-new AI chat session with no memory. The human asks this "goldfish" to read the design document. If the goldfish cannot understand the plan based only on that document, the document needs more details.
* Only after the design document is clear enough for the goldfish to understand does the human ask the AI to write the code based on those strict instructions.
* Managing AI and the Future of Work:
The author expects that regular employees will soon act like managers, overseeing multiple AI helpers. Because of this, workers need to learn basic management skills, like how to delegate tasks and set clear boundaries. Also, since AI will handle routine chores, humans will need to practice focusing for longer periods to do deeper, harder thinking. Ultimately, a worker's value will come from their planning and decision-making skills, rather than their ability to type code.
View details
Towards A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Reliable Patch Evaluation using an LLM-as-a-Judge
Renyao Wei
José Cambronero
AI-SQE '26: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on AI for Software Quality Evaluation - Judgment, Metrics, Benchmarks, and Beyond, ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), New York, NY, USA (2026), pp. 19 - 28
Preview abstract
Reliable evaluation is crucial for advancing Automated Program Repair (APR), but prevailing benchmarks that rely on execution-based evaluation methods (pass@k) often fail to capture the patch quality required for real-world adoption. This creates a significant gap between automated metrics and true patch validity (valid@k), a discrepancy observed across several state-of-the-art techniques.
To develop a scalable solution for measuring valid@k, we first study the human evaluation process itself. While manual assessment can determine validity, we find it suffers from poor inter-rater reliability (Fleiss' Kappa k=0.307). Our foundational insight is that this inconsistency is largely resolved when evaluators use a shared, high-quality rubric, which significantly improves agreement.
Building on this finding, we propose an LLM-as-a-Judge framework that operationalizes rubric-guided evaluation at scale. Our method employs a human-in-the-loop workflow where an LLM first generates a candidate rubric for a given bug, which a human expert then reviews and refines into a "golden" evaluation standard. This golden rubric is then used by an LLM judge to assess the validity of candidate patches. In an evaluation on 48 bugs and 115 patches, our LLM judge demonstrates substantial agreement with the consensus of human developers. This work contributes a scalable and reliable methodology for approximating valid@k, providing a much-needed high-fidelity signal for measuring true progress in the field of automated program repair.
View details
Preview abstract
Enterprise service centers, particularly in domains like People Operations, are critical hubs of organizational knowledge work. They face a persistent difficulty in disseminating the tacit, case-specific expertise of senior agents, which can lead to inconsistent service and slower onboarding for new hires. While existing Knowledge Management (KM) and Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) systems have improved the retrieval of historically similar cases, they inadvertently shift the cognitive burden of synthesizing this information to the time-constrained agent. This paper introduces the Dynamic Case Precedent (DCP) architecture, a novel socio-technical framework designed to address this gap. The DCP architecture moves beyond simple precedent recommendation to automated precedent synthesis. It achieves this by integrating a semantic retrieval model with the large-context reasoning capabilities of a generative Large Language Model (LLM). We propose a three-pillar framework—(1) Contextual Similarity Indexing, (2) Generative Insight Synthesis, and (3) Human-in-the-Loop Refinement. By analyzing multiple relevant historical cases to generate a concise summary of resolution patterns, the DCP architecture aims to reduce agent cognitive load, accelerate proficiency, and improve service consistency. This conceptual framework offers a new model for human-AI collaboration, framing the AI not as a mere information tool, but as an active partner in sensemaking.
View details
SAC133 - SSAC Comments on Proposed Root KSK Algorithm Rollover
Wes Hardaker
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) Reports and Advisories (2026), pp. 9
Preview abstract
The SSAC supports the transition from RSA with SHA-256 (Algorithm 8) to ECDSA P-256
with SHA-256 (Algorithm 13) as the cryptographic algorithm for the RootKSK. The root zone
has relied on RSA-based algorithms since DNSSEC signing began in 2010. The algorithm did
not change during the first KSK rollover in 2018 or during the second rollover currently
underway and scheduled to complete in October 2026. Establishing a clear and predictable
process for algorithm transitions is essential to the long-term security of the root zone, and the
SSAC observes that the proposal addresses the Recommendation 23 of the SSR2 Review
accordingly.
The SSAC notes that the proposal builds upon the Root Zone DNSSEC Algorithm Rollover
Study published by ICANN in May 2024, which assessed resolver and authoritative server
support for alternative algorithms, analyzed rollover methodologies, and evaluated operational
risks. The SSAC finds that the proposal implements the study’s recommendations. The SSAC also notes that this proposal is consistent with the SSAC’s prior work on DNSSEC key rollover,
including SAC063, SAC073, SAC102, and SAC108.
The SSAC encourages ICANN to proceed with this rollover. Specific comments on the
proposal’s methodology, timeline, and operational readiness follow
View details
Unveiling the Global Landscape of Android Security Updates
Haiyun Deng
Abbas Acar
Esteban Luques
Harun Oz
Ahmet Aris
Selcuk Uluagac
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (2026)
Preview abstract
Android is the world’s leading mobile operating
system, with over three billion active devices. Detecting vulnerabilities and ensuring timely patch deployment are critical to
maintaining security. The Android Open Source Project (AOSP)
has enhanced the transparency of security updates through Security Patch Levels. However, challenges related to update speed
and availability persist. In 2022, Google reported that half of the
zero-day vulnerabilities discovered in the wild were variations of
vulnerabilities that had already been patched. Recent research
mainly highlights delays in update distribution, often attributing
them to fragmentation and focusing primarily on flagship devices
or limited time-frames. Our approach takes a device-centric
perspective to investigate Android update patterns, analyzing
567K security update records from 2014 to 2024, covering 904
distinct devices from six key Original Equipment Manufacturers
(OEMs) across 98 countries. Our extensive analysis revealed
notable differences in update release timing across OEMs, device types, and regions. Our study also examines documented
vulnerabilities and weaknesses, while assessing OEM compliance
with Android security guidelines. Our study shows that ∼89.7%
of vulnerabilities on unpatched Android devices are exploitable
without user interaction and with low attack complexity. We
also identified delays linked to fragmentation and OEM-specific
challenges, and provide actionable insights for improvement.
View details
Preview abstract
This paper demonstrates that artificial intelligence can accelerate mathematical discovery by autonomously solving an open problem in theoretical physics. We present a neuro-symbolic system, combining the Gemini Deep Think large language model with a systematic Tree Search (TS) framework and automated numerical feedback, that successfully derived novel, exact analytical solutions for the power spectrum of gravitational radiation emitted by cosmic strings. Specifically, the agent evaluated the core integral for arbitrary loop geometries, directly improving upon recent AI-assisted attempts that only yielded partial asymptotic solutions. To substantiate our methodological claims regarding AI-accelerated discovery and to ensure transparency, we detail system prompts, search constraints, and intermittent feedback loops that guided the model. The agent identified a suite of 6 different analytical methods, the most elegant of which expands the kernel in Gegenbauer polynomials to naturally absorb the integrand's singularities. The methods lead to an asymptotic result for at large that both agrees with numerical results and also connects to the continuous Feynman parameterization of Quantum Field Theory. We detail both the algorithmic methodology that enabled this discovery and the resulting mathematical derivations.
View details
