Jarrod R. McClean
Jarrod is a research scientist in the Google Quantum Artificial Intelligence laboratory. He received his PhD in Chemical Physics from Harvard University specializing in quantum chemistry and quantum computation supported by the US Department of Energy as a Computational Science Graduate Fellow. His research interests broadly include quantum computation, quantum chemistry, numerical methods, and information sparsity.
Research Areas
Authored Publications
Sort By
Reinforcement Learning Control of Quantum Error Correction
Cameron Maxfield
Guifre Vidal
Bob Buckley
Jonathan Waltz
Christopher Wood
Reza Molavi
John Mark Kreikebaum
Rajeev Acharya
David Sobel
Abeer Vaishnav
Ali Hadjikhani
Ryuho Kudo
Wendy Leung
Brett Buchea
Ningfeng Zhu
Shirin Montazeri
Jamie Yao
Bicheng Ying
Eric Mascot
Lenny Fuste
Zhenjie Zou
Rodrigo Cortinas
Matt Lloyd
Clarke Smith
Kris Ottosson
Emma Ropes
Felix Borjans
Rebecca Potter
Sean Harrington
Jeremy Hilton
David Enriquez
Stephen Heslin
Paula Heu
Daniel Lundahl
Elliot Young
Alex Crook
Fedor Kostritsa
Roberto Rodriguez
Chia Ni
Kim Ming Lau
Priyanka Thiruraman
Martin Damyanov
Logan Oas
Dmitry Abanin
Oscar Higgott
Aaron Shorter
Steve Habegger
Aniket Maiti
Ryan Kaufman
Valerie Ehimhen
Sayra Alcaraz
Marcos Flores
Elizabeth Rossi
Aria Shahingohar
Dario Rosenstock
Travis Weidel
Steven Waltman
Kristi Wong
Murat Sarihan
Arun Kumar
Vladimir Shvarts
Matt Reagor
Alfredo Torres
Michael Qian
Anthony Megrant
Charles Neill
Christopher Hudspeth
Michael Hamilton
Bill Huggins
Laura De Lorenzo
Tan Ha
Ran Zhang
Dar Gilboa
Nicholas Bushnell
Sherman Peek
David Rhodes
Leigh Martin
Mike Shearn
Vlad Kurilovich
David Browne
Spencer Small
Brian Ballard
Will Oliver
Lior Ella
Orion Pritchard
Josh Cogan
Rachel Resnick
Dmitri Maslov
Jose Guerrero
Paul Masih Das
Theodore White
Helge Gehring
Nikita Astrakhantsev
Can Knaut
Maddy Woodson
Brooks Foxen
Frank Arute
Alejo Grajales Dau
Yaxing Zhang
Aaron Szasz
Alexander Lill
Justin Ledford
Xiaoxuan Jin
Andreas Kabel
Sid Madhuk
Orion Martin
Catherine Vollgraff Heidweiller
Gabrielle Roberts
Juan Campero
Juhwan Yoo
Robert Salazar
Michael Newman
Arpit Ranadive
James Goeders
William Giang
Gonzalo Garcia
Agnetta Cleland
Maddie Taylor
Dogan Timucin
Ross Alcaraz
Hui Kang
Johannes Bausch
William Courtney
Robert Gasca
Kevin Satzinger
Meghan Voorhees
Silas Chen
Laleh Beni
Andrew Dunsworth
Jamal Busnaina
Pavel Laptev
Kiseo Kang
Shannon Wang
Paul Donohoe
Paul Conner
Vadim Smelyanskiy
James Spencer
Benjamin Chiaro
Grayson Young
Tim Burger
ILYA Drozdov
Peter Brooks
Jordan Suchard
Austin Fowler
Jimmy Chen
Alec Eickbusch
Francisco Heras
Hung-Shen Chang
Michael Broughton
Jeanne Hartshorn
Aviv Elbag
Martin Bigdeli
Tanner Hadick
Juan Atalaya
Mahmoud Elzouka
Melvin Mathews
Alex Sztein
Markus Ansmann
Pavol Juhas
Bryan Cochrane
Murray Ich Nguyen
Ashley Maloney
Will Livingston
Roberto Collins
Ming Li
Élie Genois
Jeremiah Ford
Christopher Garrick
Sayan Das
David Peterson
Eifu Tomita
Suhas Ganjam
Reno Hiltermann
Dylan Bowers
Bryce Kobrin
Yu Chen
Dan Riley
Leon Brill
Barrett Spells
Ben Curtin
Mike Hucka
Seneca Meeks
Sebastian Molina
Tiano Lange-Dei
Georg Aigeldinger
Ashley Huff
Wing Li
ZLATKO MINEV
Monica Hansen
Sebastian Schroeder
Walt Askew
Dietrich Graumann
Elias Portoles
Stijn de Graaf
Matt Cockrell
Harold Cook
Masaya Fukami
Noah Shutty
Ed Gonzales
Robert Geiger
Amir Karamlou
Loick Le Guevel
Ebrahim Forati
Justin Vargas
Doug Thor
Joel Grebel
Lucia De Rose
LILY LI
Dave Landhuis
Emma Rosenfeld
Hsin-Yuan (Robert) Huang
Kenny Lee
Shaun Jevons
Ping Yeh
Amira Abbas
Kunal Arya
Henry Schurkus
Hector Bates
Ganesh Ramachandran
Sergey Vdovichev
Brayden Ware
Max Schaefer
Cheng Xing
Brandon Langley
Anthony Cabrera
Michel Devoret
Cody Jones
Vlad Sivak
Mert Torunbalci
Ben Kueffler
Chaitali Joshi
Raja Gosula
Joy Lee
Alexander Korotkov
Thomas Edlich
Aditya Locharla
Nathan Lacroix
George Sterling
Hao Tran
Kostyantyn Kechedzhi
Trond Andersen
Alexandre Bourassa
Aaron Lunt
Alan Fung
Alex Pizzuto
Salvatore Mandra
Alex Greene
Vitali Kutsko
Kannan Sankaragomathi
Sofia Springer
Vinicius Ferreira
Raymond Orosco
Nature (2026)
Preview abstract
The promise of fault-tolerant quantum computing is challenged by environmental drift that relentlessly degrades the quality of quantum operations. The contemporary solution, halting the entire quantum computation for recalibration, is unsustainable for the long runtimes of the future algorithms \cite{reiher2017elucidating,gidney2025factor}. We address this challenge by unifying calibration with computation, granting the quantum error correction process \cite{ryan2021realization,krinner2022realizing,sivak2023real,acharya2024quantum, bluvstein2024logical,bluvstein2025architectural,lacroix2025scaling} a dual role: its error detection events are not only used to correct the logical quantum state, but are also repurposed as a learning signal, teaching a reinforcement learning (RL) agent \cite{silver2017mastering,mnih2015human,levine2016end, shalev2016safe,ouyang2022training} to continuously steer the physical control parameters and stabilize the quantum system during the computation. We experimentally demonstrate this framework on a Willow superconducting processor, improving the logical stability of the surface code 3.5-fold against injected drift. By synthesizing our full suite of technological advances, including RL fine-tuning of the entire system and near-optimal decoding \cite{senior2025scalable, beni2025tesseract}, we achieve record performance of the surface and color codes, with average logical error per cycle of $\varepsilon_L=7.7\times10^{-4}$ and $\varepsilon_L=8.2\times10^{-3}$ respectively. Simulations of surface codes up to distance-15 with tens of thousands control parameters confirm the scalability of our RL framework, revealing an optimization speed that is independent of the system size. This work thus enables a new paradigm: a quantum computer that learns to self-improve directly from its errors and never stops computing.
View details
Exponential quantum advantage in processing massive classical data
Haimeng Zhao
Alexander Zlokapa
John Preskill
Hsin-Yuan (Robert) Huang
arXiv:2604.07639 (2026)
Preview abstract
Broadly applicable quantum advantage, particularly in classical data processing and machine learning, has been a fundamental open problem. In this work, we prove that a small quantum computer of polylogarithmic size can perform large-scale classification and dimension reduction on massive classical data by processing samples on the fly, whereas any classical machine achieving the same prediction performance requires exponentially larger size. Furthermore, classical machines that are exponentially larger yet below the required size need superpolynomially more samples and time. We validate these quantum advantages in real-world applications, including single-cell RNA sequencing and movie review sentiment analysis, demonstrating four to six orders of magnitude reduction in size with fewer than 60 logical qubits. These quantum advantages are enabled by quantum oracle sketching, an algorithm for accessing the classical world in quantum superposition using only random classical data samples. Combined with classical shadows, our algorithm circumvents the data loading and readout bottleneck to construct succinct classical models from massive classical data, a task provably impossible for any classical machine that is not exponentially larger than the quantum machine. These quantum advantages persist even when classical machines are granted unlimited time or if BPP=BQP, and rely only on the correctness of quantum mechanics. Together, our results establish machine learning on classical data as a broad and natural domain of quantum advantage and a fundamental test of quantum mechanics at the complexity frontier.
View details
Preview abstract
The quest to identify quantum advantages, where quantum physics truly outperforms classical physics, lies at the heart of quantum technology. While quantum devices promise extraordinary capabilities, from exponential computational speedups to unprecedented measurement precision, distinguishing genuine advantages from mere illusions remains a formidable challenge. In this endeavor, quantum theorists are like prophets trying to foretell a future where quantum technologies reign supreme. Yet, the boundary between visionary insight and unfounded fantasy is perilously thin. In this perspective, we explore the properties defining an ideal quantum advantage and examine our mathematical tools for navigating the vast world of quantum advantages across computation, learning, sensing, communication, and beyond. We show that some quantum advantages are inherently unpredictable using classical resources alone, suggesting a landscape far richer than what we can currently foresee. While mathematical rigor remains our indispensable guide in this exploration, the ultimate power of quantum technologies may emerge from the quantum advantages we cannot yet conceive.
View details
Generative Quantum Advantage for Classical and Quantum Problems
Robert Huang
Michael Broughton
Norhan Eassa
arXiv:2509.09033 (2025)
Preview abstract
Recent breakthroughs in generative machine learning, powered by massive computational resources, have demonstrated unprecedented human-like capabilities. While beyond-classical quantum experiments can generate samples from classically intractable distributions, their complexity has thwarted all efforts toward efficient learning. This challenge has hindered demonstrations of generative quantum advantage: the ability of quantum computers to learn and generate desired outputs substantially better than classical computers. We resolve this challenge by introducing families of generative quantum models that are hard to simulate classically, are efficiently trainable, exhibit no barren plateaus or proliferating local minima, and can learn to generate distributions beyond the reach of classical computers. Using a 68-qubit superconducting quantum processor, we demonstrate these capabilities in two scenarios: learning classically intractable probability distributions and learning quantum circuits for accelerated physical simulation. Our results establish that both learning and sampling can be performed efficiently in the beyond-classical regime, opening new possibilities for quantum-enhanced generative models with provable advantage.
View details
Preview abstract
The application of quantum computers to machine learning tasks is an exciting potential direction to explore in search of quantum advantage. In the absence of large quantum computers to empirically evaluate performance, theoretical frameworks such as the quantum probably approximately correct (PAC) and quantum statistical query (QSQ) models have been proposed to study quantum algorithms for learning classical functions.
Despite numerous works investigating quantum advntage in these models, we nevertheless only understand it at two extremes: either exponential quantum advantages for uniform input distributions or no advantage for potentially adversarial distributions.
In this work, we study the gap between these two regimes by designing an efficient quantum algorithm for learning periodic neurons in the QSQ model over a broad range of non-uniform distributions, which includes Gaussian, generalized Gaussian, and logistic distributions.
To our knowledge, our work is also the first result in quantum learning theory for classical functions that explicitly considers real-valued functions.
Recent advances in classical learning theory prove that learning periodic neurons is hard for any classical gradient-based algorithm, giving us an exponential quantum advantage over such algorithms, which are the standard workhorses of machine learning.
Moreover, in some parameter regimes, the problem remains hard for classical statistical query algorithms and even general classical algorithms learning under small amounts of noise.
View details
The Grand Challenge of Quantum Applications
Robbie King
Bill Huggins
Guang Hao Low
Tom O'Brien
arXiv:2511.09124 (2025)
Preview abstract
This perspective outlines promising pathways and critical obstacles on the road to developing useful quantum computing applications, drawing on insights from the Google Quantum AI team. We propose a five-stage framework for this process, spanning from theoretical explorations of quantum advantage to the practicalities of compilation and resource estimation. For each stage, we discuss key trends, milestones, and inherent scientific and sociological impediments. We argue that two central stages -- identifying concrete problem instances expected to exhibit quantum advantage, and connecting such problems to real-world use cases -- represent essential and currently under-resourced challenges. Throughout, we touch upon related topics, including the promise of generative artificial intelligence for aspects of this research, criteria for compelling demonstrations of quantum advantage, and the future of compilation as we enter the era of early fault-tolerant quantum computing.
View details
Preview abstract
The quest to identify quantum advantages, where quantum physics truly outperforms classical physics, lies at the heart of quantum technology. While quantum devices promise extraordinary capabilities, from exponential computational speedups to unprecedented measurement precision, distinguishing genuine advantages from mere illusions remains a formidable challenge. In this endeavor, quantum theorists are like prophets trying to foretell a future where quantum technologies reign supreme. Yet, the boundary between visionary insight and unfounded fantasy is perilously thin. In this perspective, we explore the properties defining an ideal quantum advantage and examine our mathematical tools for navigating the vast world of quantum advantages across computation, learning, sensing, communication, and beyond. We show that some quantum advantages are inherently unpredictable using classical resources alone, suggesting a landscape far richer than what we can currently foresee. While mathematical rigor remains our indispensable guide in this exploration, the ultimate power of quantum technologies may emerge from the quantum advantages we cannot yet conceive.
View details
Preview abstract
The application of quantum computers to machine learning tasks is an exciting potential direction to explore in search of quantum advantage. In the absence of large quantum computers to empirically evaluate performance, theoretical frameworks such as the quantum probably approximately correct (PAC) and quantum statistical query (QSQ) models have been proposed to study quantum algorithms for learning classical functions.
Despite numerous works investigating quantum advntage in these models, we nevertheless only understand it at two extremes: either exponential quantum advantages for uniform input distributions or no advantage for potentially adversarial distributions.
In this work, we study the gap between these two regimes by designing an efficient quantum algorithm for learning periodic neurons in the QSQ model over a broad range of non-uniform distributions, which includes Gaussian, generalized Gaussian, and logistic distributions.
To our knowledge, our work is also the first result in quantum learning theory for classical functions that explicitly considers real-valued functions.
Recent advances in classical learning theory prove that learning periodic neurons is hard for any classical gradient-based algorithm, giving us an exponential quantum advantage over such algorithms, which are the standard workhorses of machine learning.
Moreover, in some parameter regimes, the problem remains hard for classical statistical query algorithms and even general classical algorithms learning under small amounts of noise.
View details
Preview abstract
The quest to identify quantum advantages, where quantum physics truly outperforms classical physics, lies at the heart of quantum technology. While quantum devices promise extraordinary capabilities, from exponential computational speedups to unprecedented measurement precision, distinguishing genuine advantages from mere illusions remains a formidable challenge. In this endeavor, quantum theorists are like prophets trying to foretell a future where quantum technologies reign supreme. Yet, the boundary between visionary insight and unfounded fantasy is perilously thin. In this perspective, we explore the properties defining an ideal quantum advantage and examine our mathematical tools for navigating the vast world of quantum advantages across computation, learning, sensing, communication, and beyond. We show that some quantum advantages are inherently unpredictable using classical resources alone, suggesting a landscape far richer than what we can currently foresee. While mathematical rigor remains our indispensable guide in this exploration, the ultimate power of quantum technologies may emerge from the quantum advantages we cannot yet conceive.
View details
Preview abstract
Protecting user privacy in financial transactions is desirable, yet in the classical world it is effectively impossible without hardware assumptions. Most existing quantum money schemes also fail to guarantee anonymity. We introduce a construction of single-use quantum tokens that give users the ability to detect whether the issuing authority is tracking them, for which we prove unconditional security. Our tokens do not require quantum communication from the users themselves, making them relatively practical to deploy.
We discuss potential applications including one-time payment tokens, anonymous one-time pads and voting.
View details
