Publications
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Sort By
1 - 15 of 11375 publications
A Computer Vision Problem in Flatland
Erin Connelly
Annalisa Crannell
Timothy Duff
Rekha R. Thomas
SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry, 10 (2026), pp. 14-45
Preview abstract
When is it possible to project two sets of labeled points of equal cardinality lying in a pair of projective planes to the same image on a projective line? We give a complete answer to this question, obtaining the following results. We first show that such a pair of projections exist if and only if the two point sets are themselves images of a common point set in projective space. Moreover, we find that for generic pairs of point sets, a common projection exists if and only if their cardinality is at most seven. In these cases, we give an explicit description of the loci of projection centers that enable a common image.
View details
Approximate vs Precise: An experiment in what impacts user choice when apps request location access
Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’26), April 13–17, 2026, Barcelona, Spain (2026)
Preview abstract
User location data is highly sensitive, yet commonly requested by mobile apps for both core functionality and monetization. To improve user privacy, the major mobile platforms, Android and iOS, made changes so that when apps request precise location access, users can choose to share only their approximate location. However, the platforms have diverging interfaces: Android offers a side-by-side choice and iOS offers a corner toggle. This study evaluates which factors impact users’ choices when apps request location access via a randomized controlled experiment with 2579 US Android users. We tested the impact of app type, whether a reason for the request was provided, and the quality and content of the reason, including monetization. We do not find the reasons have an effect. Instead, we find users’ choices are impacted by app type and user demographics. We find that when users are given a side-by-side choice to allow approximate versus precise location access, they make reasonable choices. Of users who allowed access, the vast majority (90.7%) chose precise for a rideshare app versus the majority (71.3%) chose approximate for a local news app. Concerningly, the majority also allowed location access to a wallpaper app, and older users were significantly more likely to allow apps precise location access. We conclude by discussing implications for app platforms and future work.
View details
Preview abstract
Source-to-source compilers may perform inefficiently by executing transpilation passes on scripts that do not contain the specific language features a pass is designed to transform, potentially leading to redundant processing. A compiler can analyze a script to generate a per-script feature map, for example, by identifying language features in its abstract syntax tree (AST). Before executing a transpilation pass, the compiler can check this map and may bypass the pass for that script if the specific feature targeted by the pass is not present. This feature map can also be dynamically updated throughout the compilation process as other passes transform the code. This method of conditional pass execution based on content-aware analysis may reduce redundant AST traversals, which could decrease overall compilation time and computational resource consumption.
View details
Preview abstract
Large language models have achieved remarkable capabilities across domains, yet mechanisms underlying sophisticated reasoning continue to be explored1,2. Recent reasoning-reinforced models, including OpenAI’s o-series and DeepSeek-r1, outperform other merely instruction-tuned models on complex cognitive tasks3,4, attributed to extended test-time computation through longer chains of thought5. Here we show that enhanced reasoning emerges not from extended computation alone, but from the systematic simulation of complex, multi-agent interactions—a society of thought—which enables the deliberate diversification and debate among internal cognitive perspectives characterized by distinct personality traits and domain expertise. Through quantitative analysis using classified outputs and mechanistic interpretability methods applied to reasoning traces6–8, we find that reasoning models like DeepSeek-r1 exhibit much greater perspective diversity than baseline models, activating broader and more conflict between heterogeneous personality- and expertise-related features during reasoning. This multi-agent structure manifests in conversational behaviors including question-answering sequences, perspective shifts, and reconciliation of conflicting views, as well as in socio-emotional roles that characterize back-and-forth conversation, which together account for over 60% of the accuracy advantage in reasoning tasks through both direct and indirect facilitation of cognitive strategies9,10. Controlled reinforcement learning experiments further reveal that priming models with conversational scaffolding—even when dialogues lead to incorrect solutions—substantially accelerates reasoning improvement compared to answer-only training. These findings indicate that the social organization of thought, rather than correctness alone, enables effective exploration of solution spaces. We suggest that reasoning models establish a computational parallel to collective intelligence in human groups11–13, where diversity enables superior problem-solving when systematically structured and suggest new opportunities for agent organization to harness the wisdom of crowds.
View details
Uncovering Relationships between Android Developers, User Privacy, and Developer Willingness to Reduce Fingerprinting Risks
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’26) (2026)
Preview abstract
The major mobile platforms, Android and iOS, have introduced changes that restrict user tracking to improve user privacy, yet apps continue to covertly track users via device fingerprinting. We study the opportunity to improve this dynamic with a case study on mobile fingerprinting that evaluates developers’ perceptions of how well platforms protect user privacy and how developers perceive platform privacy interventions. Specifically, we study developers’ willingness to make changes to protect users from fingerprinting and how developers consider trade-offs between user privacy and developer effort. We do this via a survey of 246 Android developers, presented with a hypothetical Android change that protects users from fingerprinting at the cost of additional developer effort.
We find developers overwhelmingly (89%) support this change, even when they anticipate significant effort, yet prefer the change be optional versus required. Surprisingly, developers who use fingerprinting are six times more likely to support the change, despite being most impacted by it. We also find developers are most concerned about compliance and enforcement. In addition, our results show that while most rank iOS above Android for protecting user privacy, this distinction significantly reduces among developers very familiar with fingerprinting. Thus there is an important opportunity for platforms and developers to collaboratively build privacy protections, and we present actionable ways platforms can facilitate this.
View details
Preview abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are trained on web-scale corpora that exhibit steep power-law distributions, in which the distribution of knowledge is highly long-tailed, with most appearing infrequently. While scaling has improved average-case performance, persistent failures on low-frequency, domain-specific, cultural, and temporal knowledge remain poorly characterized. This paper develops a structured taxonomy and analysis of long-tail knowledge in large language models, synthesizing prior work across technical and sociotechnical perspectives.
We organize the literature along four complementary axes: how long-tail knowledge is defined, the mechanisms by which it is lost or distorted during training and inference, the technical interventions proposed to mitigate these failures, and the implications of these failures for fairness, accountability, transparency, and user trust. We further examine how existing evaluation practices obscure tail behavior and complicate accountability for rare but consequential failures. The paper concludes by identifying open challenges related to privacy, sustainability, and governance that constrain long-tail knowledge representation. Taken together, this paper provides a unifying conceptual framework for understanding how long-tail knowledge is defined, lost, evaluated, and manifested in deployed language model systems.
View details
Preview abstract
In modern Kubernetes environments, eBPF (Extended Berkeley Packet Filter) has become the de facto standard for high-performance dataplane enforcement. However, this architecture introduces a complex distributed state problem: the asynchronous synchronization between the Kubernetes control plane (Intent) and the kernel-space BPF maps (Reality).
A critical failure mode, termed “Silent Divergence,” occurs when the control plane believes a network policy or identity is applied, but the underlying kernel state is missing or corrupted. In this “Gray Failure” state, standard observability tools—including logs, liveness probes, and agent status checks—report health, while the network silently drops traffic.
This paper introduces eBPF-Auditor, a specialized consistency verification framework. Unlike standard agents that rely on event-based reconciliation, eBPF-Auditor performs a periodic “Two-Way State Audit” that mathematically verifies the intersection of Kubernetes Intent and BPF Reality. We demonstrate through fault injection and benchmarks on 5,000 pods that this approach successfully detects state drift with 100% accuracy and negligible sub-millisecond overhead (ms), making it a viable solution for high-frequency runtime verification in production hyperscale clusters.
View details
Bi-level Hierarchical Neural Contextual Bandits for Online Recommendation
Yunzhe Qi
Yikun Ban
Allan Stewart
Chuanwei Ruan
Jiachuan He
Shishir Kumar Prasad
Haixun Wang
Jingrui He
Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2026)
Preview abstract
Contextual bandit algorithms aim to identify the optimal choice among a set of candidate arms, based on their contextual information. Among others, the neural contextual bandit algorithms have demonstrated generally superior performance compared to traditional linear and kernel-based methods. Nevertheless, neural methods are not inherently suitable to handle a large number of candidate arms due to their high computational cost when performing neural exploration.
Motivated by the widespread availability of arm category information (e.g., movie genres, retailer types), we formulate contextual bandits into a bi-level recommendation problem based on the accessible arm category information, and propose a novel neural bandit framework, named H2N-Bandit, which utilizes a bi-level hierarchical neural structure to mitigate the substantial computational cost found in conventional neural bandit methods.
To demonstrate its effectiveness, we provide the regret bound for H2N-Bandit under the over-parameterized neural bandit settings. Furthermore, to illustrate its efficiency, we conduct extensive experiments on multiple real-world public data sets with various specifications, showing that H2N-Bandit can significantly reduce the computational cost over existing non-linear methods while achieving better or comparable performances against state-of-the-art baselines.
View details
Preview abstract
This talk addresses the challenges of operating Google's monitoring systems at scale, handling terabytes of telemetry data and preventing overload from diverse workloads. We'll explore how Google's internal client library and Monarch, its planet-scale time-series database, work together for cost-effective data collection. Key principles include a distributed push model, dynamic client-side data reduction, centralized retention, and periodic metric analysis. The session will then bridge these concepts to the open-source world, discussing our work with OpenTelemetry's OpAMP protocol to achieve similar scalable and efficient telemetry collection. Attendees will gain insights into adapting these principles for cost savings and learn about our collaboration with the OpAMP SIG to benefit the broader community.
View details
A Framework for Interactive Machine Learning and Enhanced Conversational Systems
Jerry Young
Richard Abisla
Sanjay Batra
Mikki Phan
Nature, Springer-Verlag (2026)
Preview abstract
Conversational systems are increasingly prevalent, yet current versions often fail to support the full range of human speech, including variations in speed, rhythm, syntax, grammar, articulation, and resonance. This reduces their utility for individuals with dysarthria, apraxia, dysphonia, and other language and speech-related disabilities. Building on research that emphasizes the need for specialized datasets and model training tools, our study uses a scaffolded approach to understand the ideal model training and voice recording process. Our findings highlight two distinct user flows for improving model training and provide six guidelines for future conversational system-related co-design frameworks. This study offers important insights on creating more effective conversational systems by emphasizing the need to integrate interactive machine learning into training strategies.
View details
The Ontic-Epistemic Distinction: Implications for General Intelligence
Master's Thesis (2026) (to appear)
Preview abstract
The current pursuit of robust machine intelligence is largely predicated on a substrate independent, computational functionalist view of cognition, where sufficiently complex computational processing is expected to eventually yield generalized reasoning. This paper explores the ontological distinctions between these computational frameworks and biological cognition, specifically how these differences impact the capacity for semantic understanding. By analyzing phenomena such as the "reversal curse" where models fail to generalize the symmetry in identity relations (A=B implies B=A), and performance on novel reasoning benchmarks (e.g., ARC-AGI), this paper examines whether current model limitations are transient artifacts of scale or indicative of a distinct architectural category. Integrating Stevan Harnad’s “symbol grounding problem” with Evan Thompson’s biological model of “intrinsic normativity,” I investigate whether robust general intelligence might require sense-making: a process distinct from information processing, whereby an agent’s internal states are causally coupled with its environment via survival or system-wide stakes which grounds symbols in meaning. Current Large Language Models (LLMs) appear to lack this intrinsic normativity, and consequently may operate primarily as epistemic instruments rather than ontic agents. By introducing the concept of “ontic grounding”, this paper presents a potential framework for distinguishing between the simulation of reasoning and true understanding, which could have implications for AI safety and governance.
View details
CoDaS: AI Co-Data-Scientist for Biomarker Discovery via Wearable Sensors
Juro Gottweis
CJ Park
Salman Rahman
Ahmed Metwally
Hong Yu
Ivor Rendulic
Yuzhe Yang
Petar Sirkovic
Daniel McDuff
Shwetak Patel
Nicolas Stroppa
Yubin Kim
Mark Malhotra
Orson Xu
Sam Schmidgall
Tim Althoff
Elahe Vedadi
Cynthia Breazeal
Hae Won Park
(2026)
Digital Shadow AI Risk Theoretical Framework (DART): A Framework for Managing Data Disclosure and Privacy Risks of AI tools at Work
Master's Thesis (2026)
Preview abstract
The accelerated integration of generative AI technologies and agentic AI tools, particularly those like ChatGPT, into workplace settings has introduced complex challenges concerning data governance, regulatory compliance, and organizational privacy (GDPR 2016; CCPA/CPRA). This study introduces the Digital Shadow AI Risk Theoretical Framework (DART)—a novel theoretical framework designed to systematically identify, classify, and address the latent risks arising from the widespread, and often unregulated, use of AI systems in professional environments (NIST, 2023; OECD AI Policy Observatory, 2023). DART introduces six original, interrelated constructs developed in this study: Unintentional Disclosure Risk, Trust-Dependence Paradox, Data Sovereignty Conflict, Knowledge Dilution Phenomenon, Ethical Black Box Problem, and Organizational Feedback Loops. Each construct reflects a unique dimension of risk that emerges as organizations increasingly rely on AI-driven tools for knowledge work and decision-making.
The framework is empirically tested through a mixed-methods research design involving hypothesis testing and statistical analysis of behavioral data gathered from cross-sectional surveys of industry professionals. Two cross-industry surveys (Survey-1: 416 responses, 374 analyzed; Survey-2: 203 responses, 179 analyzed) and CB-SEM tests supported seven of eight hypotheses; H4 (sovereignty) was not significant; H7 (knowledge dilution) was confirmed in replication. The findings highlight critical gaps in employee training, policy awareness, and risk mitigation strategies—underscoring the urgent need for updated governance frameworks, comprehensive AI-use policies, and targeted educational interventions. This paper contributes to emerging scholarship by offering a robust model for understanding and mitigating digital risks in AI-enabled workplaces, providing practical implications for compliance officers, risk managers, and organizational leaders aiming to harness the benefits of generative AI responsibly and securely. The novelty of DART lies in its explicit theorization of workplace-level behavioral risks—especially Shadow AI, which unlike Shadow IT externalizes organizational knowledge into adaptive systems—thereby offering a unified framework that bridges fragmented literatures and grounds them in empirical evidence.
View details
Preview abstract
This framework manages AI agents by establishing behavioral boundaries and a persistent identity. It uses a multi-layered stack, combining safety rules with brand guidelines, to shape an agent's reasoning. Features include authority decay to limit power if confidence drops and memory segmentation to prevent data tampering. Centralized oversight ensures these digital representatives remain aligned with company policies through continuous monitoring and testing.
View details
Preview abstract
Modern user interfaces are complex composites, with elements originating from various sources, such as the operating system, apps, a web browser, or websites. Many security and privacy models implicitly depend on users correctly identifying an element's source, a concept we term ''surface attribution.'' Through two large-scale vignette-based surveys (N=4,400 and N=3,057), we present the first empirical measurement of this ability.
We find that users struggle, correctly attributing UI source only 55% of the time on desktop and 53% on mobile. Familiarity and strong brand cues significantly improve accuracy, whereas UI positioning, a long-held security design concept especially for browsers, has minimal impact. Furthermore, simply adding a ''Security & Privacy'' brand cue to Android permission prompts failed to improve attribution. These findings demonstrate a fundamental gap in users' mental models, indicating that relying on them to distinguish trusted UI is a fragile security paradigm.
View details
