Publications
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Sort By
1 - 15 of 11355 publications
Usability Hasn’t Peaked: Exploring How Expressive Design Overcomes the Usability Plateau
Alyssa Sheehan
Bianca Gallardo
Ying Wang
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’26), April 13–17, 2026, Barcelona, Spain (2026)
Preview abstract
Critics have argued that mobile usability has largely been optimized, and that only incremental gains are possible. We set out to explore if the newest generation of design systems, which promote greater flexibility and a return to design basics, could produce substantially more usable designs while maintaining or increasing aesthetic judgments. Through a study with 48 diverse participants completing tasks in 10 different applications, we found that in designs created following Material 3 Expressive guidelines, users fixated on the correct screen element for a task 33% faster, completed tasks 20% faster, and rated experiences more positively compared to versions designed using the previous Material design system. These improvements in performance and aesthetic ratings challenge the premise of a usability plateau and show that mobile usability has not peaked. We illustrate specific opportunities to make mobile experiences more usable by returning to design fundamentals while highlighting risks of added flexibility.
View details
Who Controls the Curriculum for AI? The Limits of Participatory Design for Educational AI
Learning Under Algorithmic Conditions, University of Minnesota Press (2026)
Preview abstract
Participatory design is a long-standing effort to shift control over technology design from technologists to users and communities impacted by technologies. For educational AI, this means involving students, families, teachers, and other stakeholders in shaping the design of AI systems. While promising, in this article, I situate the recent calls for participatory design of educational AI systems within a different historical tradition—that of contests over local control of educational curricula. I argue that approaches that attempt to steer the design and development of educational AI through participatory methods may inadvertently reproduce the history of political contestation of educational curricula, in ways that may privilege the most powerful communities, rather than those inequitably impacted. What might it look like to treat participatory AI design as a site for political contestation? How might these approaches avoid reproducing the same majoritarian tendencies that led to educational inequities in the first place?
View details
Preview abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as economic agents in marketplaces, auctions, and bidding settings. Anticipating their behavior in any specific deployment is hard. Existing strategic-reasoning benchmarks evaluate models on fixed canonical games. These benchmarks may saturate as the frontier improves, and they do not allow evaluators to generalize with confidence from benchmark performance to the varied and messy strategic environments that actual deployments involve. We introduce GENSTRAT, which uses procedurally generated strategic environments to address these challenges. Concretely, we generate a distribution of two-player zero-sum imperfect-information card games. The generator can draw fresh games on demand, allowing for evergreen evaluation and resistance to contamination. We pair the game distribution with a capability-profile methodology that decomposes model competence across six axes (state space, temporal depth, information sensitivity, opponent modeling, risk, and brittleness). We also introduce a jaggedness measure of within-distribution smoothness that detects when a model’s advantage jumps unpredictably between strategically similar games. We sample 50 benchmark games from a 2,000-game generated pool and evaluate nine frontier and open-weight LLMs in a head-to-head tournament with over 36,000 matches. Newer frontier-tier models score higher on average. Beyond that average, models with near-identical overall strength show qualitatively different capability profiles, and two of the top three leaderboard models (gpt-5 and claude) are noticeably more locally volatile than the third (gemini-3.1-pro), despite being close in overall strength. Together, the capability profile and the jaggedness measure give a deployment-relevant diagnostic that the overall ranking alone cannot provide.
View details
Causal Armor: Efficient Indirect Prompt Injection Guardrails via Causal Attribution
Minbeom Kim
Phil Wallis
Kyomin Jung
Dj Dvijotham
2026
Preview abstract
AI agents equipped with tool-calling capabilities are susceptible to \emph{Indirect Prompt Injection} (IPI) attacks. In this attack scenario, malicious commands hidden within \emph{untrusted} content trick the agent into performing unauthorized actions. Existing defenses can reduce attack success but often suffer from the \emph{over-defense dilemma}: they deploy expensive, \emph{always-on} sanitization that degrades utility and latency even in benign scenarios. We revisit IPI through an operational causal lens: a successful injection manifests as a \emph{grounding collapse} where the user request no longer provides decisive support for the agent's privileged action, while a particular untrusted segment provides disproportionate marginal support. Based on this signature, we propose \texttt{CausalArmor}, a selective defense framework that (i) computes lightweight, normalized leave-one-out attributions at privileged decision points, and (ii) triggers targeted sanitization only when an untrusted segment dominates the user intent. Additionally, CausalArmor employs \emph{retroactive Chain-of-Thought masking} to prevent the agent from acting on ``poisoned" reasoning traces. Experiments on AgentDojo and DoomArena demonstrate that CausalArmor matches the security of aggressive defenses with explainability while preserving utility and latency of AI agents.
View details
Preview abstract
Existing image simplification techniques often rely on Non-Photorealistic Rendering (NPR), transforming photographs into stylized sketches, cartoons, or paintings. While effective at reducing visual complexity, such approaches typically sacrifice photographic realism. In this work, we explore a complementary direction: simplifying images while preserving their photorealistic appearance.
We introduce progressive semantic image simplification, a framework that iteratively reduces scene complexity by removing and inpainting elements in a controlled manner. At each step, the resulting image remains a plausible natural photograph. Our method combines semantic understanding with generative editing, leveraging Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to identify and prioritize elements for removal, and a learned verifier to ensure photorealism and coherence throughout the process. This is implemented via an iterative \emph{Select–Remove–Verify} pipeline that produces high-quality simplification trajectories.
To improve efficiency, we further distill this process into an image-to-video generation model that directly predicts coherent simplification sequences from a single input image. Beyond generating cleaner and more focused compositions, our approach enables applications such as content-aware decluttering, semantic layer decomposition, and interactive editing.
More broadly, our work suggests that simplification through structured content removal can serve as a practical mechanism for guiding visual interpretation within the photorealistic domain, complementing traditional abstraction methods.
View details
Securing Multi-Agent Systems: An Empirical Analysis of Security Prompt Hardening and Residual Risks
Mithil Roshan
Shashank Nagesh
(2026)
Preview abstract
The rapid adoption of agentic systems powered by
large language models (LLMs) introduces significant
security challenges distinct from plain conversational
models, particularly concerning prompt injection and
tool misuse due to their dynamic personas and real-
world tool interactions. This paper investigates the
effectiveness of hardened security prompting in a
task-oriented multi-agent framework, using a coding
assistant as a representative case study. We com-
pare a baseline ”unhardened” agent against a ”hard-
ened” version equipped with explicit security guide-
lines applied across all sub-agents. Our evaluation
across 150+ single-turn and 32 multi-turn attack sce-
narios demonstrates that prompt hardening dramat-
ically improves resilience. With a simple, approxi-
mately 500-token security hardener, single-turn fail-
ure rates dropped from 19.48% to 2.60%, while multi-
turn failure rates decreased from 75.00% to 46.88%.
Furthermore, we show that successfully bypassing the
hardened agent requires significantly more adversar-
ial effort and a greater number of chat turns. How-
ever, the analysis also reveals a critical shift in vul-
nerability taxonomy: as direct attacks fail, adver-
saries exploit the agent’s core functionality via ”Func-
tional Wrappers” (Intent Obfuscation), highlighting
a residual risk that necessitates a shift in the defen-
sive paradigm from static filters to dynamic runtime
state and intent analysis.
View details
Reasoning-Driven Synthetic Data Generation and Evaluation
Tim R. Davidson
Benoit Seguin
Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2026)
Preview abstract
Although many AI applications of interest require specialized multi-modal models, relevant data to train such models is inherently scarce or inaccessible. Filling these gaps with human annotators is prohibitively expensive, error-prone, and time-consuming, leading model builders to increasingly consider synthetic data as a scalable alternative. However, existing synthetic data generation methods often rely on manual prompts, evolutionary algorithms, or extensive seed data from the target distribution — limiting their scalability, explainability, and control. In this paper, we introduce Simula: a novel reasoning-driven framework for data generation and evaluation. It employs a seedless, agentic approach to generate synthetic datasets at scale, allowing users to define desired dataset characteristics through an explainable and controllable process that enables fine-grained resource allocation. We show the efficacy of our approach on a variety of datasets, rigorously testing both intrinsic and downstream properties. Our work (1) offers guidelines for synthetic data mechanism design, (2) provides insights into generating and evaluating synthetic data at scale, and (3) unlocks new opportunities for developing and deploying AI in domains where data scarcity or privacy concerns are paramount.
View details
Calibrating Trustworthiness in GenAI
Allison Woodruff
Derrick Feldmann
Colleen Thompson-Kuhn
The Advertising Council Research Institute, The Advertising Council Research Institute (2026)
Preview abstract
Generative or “GenAI”—a type of artificial intelligence that can create new content, including text, images, music, and videos, by learning from existing data—is a constantly changing and improving tool gaining widespread use around the world. According to McKinsey’s 2024 Global Survey on AI adoption, 65% of professionals reported their organizations regularly using GenAI, up from 33% the year prior.
With GenAI no longer a new tool, and one with user adoption continuing to increase year over year, the Ad Council Research Institute (ACRI), in partnership with Google, set out to understand what the American public knows and feels about GenAI in 2025. Who’s familiar with GenAI, and who uses it? How do they feel about its role in work and at home? How much do these users believe in its usefulness and benefits? What messaging (explanations and in-app statements) are most helpful for users?
View details
Preview abstract
The management of a hybrid workforce comprising human and autonomous computational agents may be challenged by the use of separate systems for human capital and software assets, which can create a governance gap. A system can provide a unified framework for managing a hybrid workforce. For example, the system may utilize a labor service mesh to analyze and route tasks to either a human intent tier or an agentic execution tier. A potential principle of the system is structural symmetry, where computational agents can be assigned digital identities and managed through a lifecycle process that may parallel human resource functions, such as onboarding, performance evaluation, and structured offboarding. This integrated approach can facilitate a unified system of record and governance model for an organization's intelligence capacity.
View details
Preview abstract
As the ECMAScript specification evolves, industrial-scale JavaScript compilers face the challenge of supporting modern language syntax while maintaining compatibility for diverse execution environments. Traditionally, compilers solve this by running transpilation passes in a monolithic pipeline, where the transpilation passes are chosen to execute strictly based on a target language level. This results in significant computational waste, as compilers perform expensive Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) traversals to lower features that may not exist in the actual input source code. We present a static analysis improvement that conditionally executes transpiler passes based on accurately tracking and dynamically maintaining the exact set of language features seen in the compilation unit throughout the transpilation process. It is implemented in the production Google Closure Compiler. By populating and maintaining a FeatureSet at every JavaScript script-level, it dynamically skips running the unnecessary lowering passes. We detail the architectural safeguards - including strategic pass ordering and dynamic validation of the transpiled code for feature-correctness. Evaluation of this improvement on large-scale production applications produced a considerable reduction in compilation time and saved compute and memory usage.
View details
Preview abstract
We study the problem of allocating access point bandwidth to users of a wireless network in the presence of adversarial jamming. Specifically, we consider a setting in which the network designer acts first and allocates access point bandwidth to the users of the network, before an adversary applies a jamming strategy to reduce the bandwidth of a subset (or all) of the access points. We consider a strong adversary who has complete information and can optimize the jamming strategy, subject to power budget constraints. In turn, the network designer must allocate the resources in anticipation of the adversary's actions.
We explain that our model gives rise to a special network interdiction model, which differs from the standard setting in two ways: The first is that the interdictor is given the benefit of responding, rather than leading the game. The second is that the interdiction is fractional and performed at the node level of the network. The interdiction then propagates to all edges incident to the access point.
In terms of technical results, we provide an allocation algorithm that is based on linear programming duality and show that the algorithm can solve the problem optimally, assuming knowledge of the adversary's budget constraints. We conduct experiments on synthetic data to show the extent to which the algorithm improves the total utilized bandwidth over the algorithm that optimizes bandwidth allocation while being oblivious to the adversary's existence.
View details
In Search of "Weird Corners": Diagnosing the Limits of Convergent AI in Professional Creative Practice
Mark Williams
2026
Preview abstract
Generative AI assistants typically embody a convergent "Coach" paradigm designed to resolve ambiguity. While effective for technical tasks, this risks premature convergence in creative domains, constraining output variance. To diagnose this, we conducted a qualitative study (N=9) where expert creatives interacted with a deliberately convergent AI "Coach." Findings reveal an interactional paradox: while the AI’s linear framework provides "ignition" utility by unblocking conceptualization, its strict linearity clashes with organic workflows. Furthermore, this structural convergence often induces "aesthetic sanitization," yielding generic outputs that limit individualized nuance. Rejecting subservient agreement, experts desire active collaborators capable of productive tension. We subsequently reframe output convergence as a "full-stack" design challenge, identifying prescriptive interfaces as an unmet opportunity for optimization. To empower authentic expression's "weird corners," we call for Generative frameworks operationalizing the Double Diamond, utilizing fluid role-shifting and contextual memory to balance additive improvisation with rigorous critique.
View details
Improving Low-Vision Chart Accessibility via On-Cursor Visual Context
Yotam Sechayk
Hennes Rave
Max Radler
Mark Colley
Ariel Shamir
Takeo Igarashi
Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 26)
Preview abstract
Despite widespread use, charts remain largely inaccessible for Low-Vision Individuals (LVI). Reading charts requires viewing data points within a global context, which is difficult for LVI who may rely on magnification or experience a partial field of vision. We aim to improve exploration by providing visual access to critical context. To inform this, we conducted a formative study with five LVI. We identified four fundamental contextual elements common across chart types: axes, legend, grid lines, and the overview. We propose two pointer-based interaction methods to provide this context: Dynamic Context, a novel focus+context interaction, and Mini-map, which adapts overview+detail principles for LVI. In a study with N=22 LVI, we compared both methods and evaluated their integration to current tools. Our results show that Dynamic Context had significant positive impact on access, usability, and effort reduction; however, worsened visual load. Mini-map strengthened spatial understanding, but was less preferred for this task. We offer design insights to guide the development of future systems that support LVI with visual context while balancing visual load.
View details
Preview abstract
Managing compiler build errors that can arise during infrastructure upgrades in large, polyglot codebases may be challenging, as manual remediation can be slow and some automated tools may not support modern language syntax. A system can provide automated error remediation by ingesting compiler diagnostics and analyzing source code using an Abstract Syntax Tree (AST). A recursive scope resolution algorithm, for example, can traverse the AST to identify a specific and narrowly-scoped code block at which to apply an error suppression. Conversely, this algorithmic complexity can be bypassed when lexical scope resolution is not required, and the system can identify the specific location of error suppressions directly from the error's exact coordinates. The system may then generate and apply language-specific patches, such as structured comments for JavaScript source files or line-scoped comments for TypeScript source files, for example, by using a transactional rewrite engine. This approach can provide a scalable method for managing automated code remediation, which may facilitate infrastructure upgrades by reducing the need for manual intervention.
View details
