Publications
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Sort By
1 - 15 of 11415 publications
Preview abstract
For many practical applications of quantum computing, the slowest and most costly steps involve coherently accessing classical data. We help address this challenge by applying mass production techniques, which can sometimes allow us to perform operations many times in parallel for a cost that is comparable to a single execution[1-3]. We combine existing mass-production results with modern approaches for loading classical data using ``quantum read-only memory.'' We show that quantum mass production techniques offer no benefit when we consider a cost model that focuses purely on the number of non-Clifford gates. However, analyzing the constant factors in a more nuanced cost model, we find that it may be possible to obtain a reduction in cost of an order or magnitude or more for a variety reasonably-sized fault-tolerant quantum algorithms. We present several applications of quantum mass-production techniques beyond naive parallelization, including a strategy for reducing the cost of serial calls to the same data loading step.
View details
Preview abstract
Large language models have achieved remarkable capabilities across domains, yet mechanisms underlying sophisticated reasoning continue to be explored1,2. Recent reasoning-reinforced models, including OpenAI’s o-series and DeepSeek-r1, outperform other merely instruction-tuned models on complex cognitive tasks3,4, attributed to extended test-time computation through longer chains of thought5. Here we show that enhanced reasoning emerges not from extended computation alone, but from the systematic simulation of complex, multi-agent interactions—a society of thought—which enables the deliberate diversification and debate among internal cognitive perspectives characterized by distinct personality traits and domain expertise. Through quantitative analysis using classified outputs and mechanistic interpretability methods applied to reasoning traces6–8, we find that reasoning models like DeepSeek-r1 exhibit much greater perspective diversity than baseline models, activating broader and more conflict between heterogeneous personality- and expertise-related features during reasoning. This multi-agent structure manifests in conversational behaviors including question-answering sequences, perspective shifts, and reconciliation of conflicting views, as well as in socio-emotional roles that characterize back-and-forth conversation, which together account for over 60% of the accuracy advantage in reasoning tasks through both direct and indirect facilitation of cognitive strategies9,10. Controlled reinforcement learning experiments further reveal that priming models with conversational scaffolding—even when dialogues lead to incorrect solutions—substantially accelerates reasoning improvement compared to answer-only training. These findings indicate that the social organization of thought, rather than correctness alone, enables effective exploration of solution spaces. We suggest that reasoning models establish a computational parallel to collective intelligence in human groups11–13, where diversity enables superior problem-solving when systematically structured and suggest new opportunities for agent organization to harness the wisdom of crowds.
View details
Unveiling the Global Landscape of Android Security Updates
Haiyun Deng
Abbas Acar
Esteban Luques
Harun Oz
Ahmet Aris
Selcuk Uluagac
IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (2026)
Preview abstract
Android is the world’s leading mobile operating
system, with over three billion active devices. Detecting vulnerabilities and ensuring timely patch deployment are critical to
maintaining security. The Android Open Source Project (AOSP)
has enhanced the transparency of security updates through Security Patch Levels. However, challenges related to update speed
and availability persist. In 2022, Google reported that half of the
zero-day vulnerabilities discovered in the wild were variations of
vulnerabilities that had already been patched. Recent research
mainly highlights delays in update distribution, often attributing
them to fragmentation and focusing primarily on flagship devices
or limited time-frames. Our approach takes a device-centric
perspective to investigate Android update patterns, analyzing
567K security update records from 2014 to 2024, covering 904
distinct devices from six key Original Equipment Manufacturers
(OEMs) across 98 countries. Our extensive analysis revealed
notable differences in update release timing across OEMs, device types, and regions. Our study also examines documented
vulnerabilities and weaknesses, while assessing OEM compliance
with Android security guidelines. Our study shows that ∼89.7%
of vulnerabilities on unpatched Android devices are exploitable
without user interaction and with low attack complexity. We
also identified delays linked to fragmentation and OEM-specific
challenges, and provide actionable insights for improvement.
View details
System for a Secure, Outcome-Based Synthetic Labor Market Using Trusted Execution Environments
Patent (2026)
Preview abstract
Some artificial intelligence provisioning models that function as tools for human users or rely on labor arbitrage can present challenges for organizations, such as managing personnel rather than task outcomes and introducing data security risks. An architecture is described for an outcome-based synthetic labor market in which autonomous computational agents can be compensated based on verified task completion. The framework can leverage trusted execution environments to create secure hardware enclaves for processing sensitive data, which can render the data cryptographically inaccessible to a host system or agent provider. This approach can facilitate a secure, transactional market for autonomous professional execution, which may enable a shift from managing labor resources to procuring verified outcomes from a pool of specialized agents.
View details
Preview abstract
We introduce AASE (Activation-based AI Safety Enforcement), a framework for post-perception safety monitoring in large language models. Unlike pre-perception approaches that analyze input or output text, AASE monitors the model's internal activation patterns—what the model "understands" rather than what text it processes or generates—enabling detection of safety-relevant states before harmful outputs are produced. The framework comprises three techniques: Activation Fingerprinting (AF) for harmful content detection, Agent Action Gating (AAG) for prompt injection defense, and Activation Policy Compliance (APC) for enterprise policy enforcement. We introduce paired contrastive training to isolate safety-relevant signals from confounding factors such as topic and style, addressing signal entanglement in polysemantic activations. Validation across 7 models from 3 architecture families shows strong class separation: Gemma-2-9B achieves AUC 1.00 with 7.2σ separation across all probes; AAG achieves AUC ≥0.88 across all models on the InjecAgent benchmark; APC achieves 0.97-1.00 AUC across three enterprise policies. Model size correlates with probe quality—Gemma-2-9B (7.2σ separation) outperforms Gemma-2-2B (4.3σ). All techniques survive INT4 quantization with minimal separation degradation. AASE is 9× faster than Llama Guard 3 (33ms vs 306ms) with higher TPR (88% vs 50%) at a tunable threshold that trades FPR for detection sensitivity, adding only 0.002ms probe overhead to existing inference.
View details
Preview abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as economic agents in marketplaces, auctions, and bidding settings. Anticipating their behavior in any specific deployment is hard. Existing strategic-reasoning benchmarks evaluate models on fixed canonical games. These benchmarks may saturate as the frontier improves, and they do not allow evaluators to generalize with confidence from benchmark performance to the varied and messy strategic environments that actual deployments involve. We introduce GENSTRAT, which uses procedurally generated strategic environments to address these challenges. Concretely, we generate a distribution of two-player zero-sum imperfect-information card games. The generator can draw fresh games on demand, allowing for evergreen evaluation and resistance to contamination. We pair the game distribution with a capability-profile methodology that decomposes model competence across six axes (state space, temporal depth, information sensitivity, opponent modeling, risk, and brittleness). We also introduce a jaggedness measure of within-distribution smoothness that detects when a model’s advantage jumps unpredictably between strategically similar games. We sample 50 benchmark games from a 2,000-game generated pool and evaluate nine frontier and open-weight LLMs in a head-to-head tournament with over 36,000 matches. Newer frontier-tier models score higher on average. Beyond that average, models with near-identical overall strength show qualitatively different capability profiles, and two of the top three leaderboard models (gpt-5 and claude) are noticeably more locally volatile than the third (gemini-3.1-pro), despite being close in overall strength. Together, the capability profile and the jaggedness measure give a deployment-relevant diagnostic that the overall ranking alone cannot provide.
View details
Preview abstract
Deep-learning methods have boosted the analytical power of Raman spectroscopy, yet they still require large, task-specific, labeled datasets and often fail to transfer across application domains. The study explores pre-trained encoders as a solution. Pre-trained encoders have significantly impacted Natural Language Processing and Computer Vision with their ability to learn transferable representations that can be applied to a variety of datasets, significantly reducing the amount of time and data required to create capable models. The following work puts forward a new approach that applies these benefits to Raman Spectroscopy. The proposed approach, RSPTE (Raman Spectroscopy Pre-Trained Encoder), is designed to learn generalizable spectral representations without labels. RSPTE employs a novel domain adaptation strategy using unsupervised Barlow Twins decorrelation objectives to learn fundamental spectral patterns from multi-domain Raman Spectroscopy datasets containing samples from medicine, biology, and mineralogy. Transferability is demonstrated through evaluation on several models created by fine-tuning RSPTE for different application domains: Medicine (detection of Melanoma and COVID), Biology (Pathogen Identification), and Agriculture. As an example, using only 20% of the dataset, models trained with RSPTE achieve accuracies ranging 50%–86% (depending on the dataset used) while without RSPTE the range is 9%–57%. Using the full dataset, accuracies with RSPTE range 81%–97%, and without pretraining 51%–97%. Current methods and state-of-the-art models in Raman Spectroscopy are compared to RSPTE for context, and RSPTE exhibits competitive results, especially with less data as well. These results provide evidence that the proposed RSPTE model can effectively learn and transfer generalizable spectral features across different domains, achieving accurate results with less data in less time (both data collection time and training time).
View details
Linear-Core Surrogates: Smooth Loss Functions with Linear Rates for Classification and Structured Prediction
Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2026)
Preview abstract
A fundamental dichotomy in the theory of classification sets smoothness against statistical efficiency: smooth surrogate losses such as the logistic loss enable fast $O(1/T)$ optimization but yield slow square-root $H$-consistency bounds, while piecewise-linear losses like the Hinge loss achieve optimal linear $H$-consistency rates but are non-differentiable. We introduce Linear-Core (LC) Surrogates, the first family of explicit convex loss functions that provably resolve this tension. By stitching a linear core to a smooth tail, we construct surrogates that are differentiable everywhere ($C^1$, and even $C^2$ under mild conditions) while retaining strict linear $H$-consistency bounds, the strongest known form of consistency guarantee. We establish these linear bounds across three increasingly complex settings: binary classification, multi-class classification, and structured prediction. To our knowledge, this is the first explicit construction to simultaneously achieve smoothness and linear $H$-consistency in any of these settings. Beyond their theoretical appeal, Linear-Core Surrogates offer practical advantages. In multi-class classification, their constant gradient profile near the decision boundary provides natural robustness to instance-dependent label noise, outperforming Cross-Entropy by 2.6% on corrupted CIFAR-10. In structured prediction, their smoothness enables an unbiased stochastic gradient estimator that bypasses the $O(|Y|^2)$ per-step complexity of exact inference, yielding a 23$\times$ speedup over Structured SVMs on large-vocabulary sequence tagging tasks.
View details
A Framework for Interactive Machine Learning and Enhanced Conversational Systems
Jerry Young
Richard Abisla
Sanjay Batra
Mikki Phan
Nature, Springer-Verlag (2026)
Preview abstract
Conversational systems are increasingly prevalent, yet current versions often fail to support the full range of human speech, including variations in speed, rhythm, syntax, grammar, articulation, and resonance. This reduces their utility for individuals with dysarthria, apraxia, dysphonia, and other language and speech-related disabilities. Building on research that emphasizes the need for specialized datasets and model training tools, our study uses a scaffolded approach to understand the ideal model training and voice recording process. Our findings highlight two distinct user flows for improving model training and provide six guidelines for future conversational system-related co-design frameworks. This study offers important insights on creating more effective conversational systems by emphasizing the need to integrate interactive machine learning into training strategies.
View details
Preview abstract
Validating conversational artificial intelligence (AI) for regulated medical software applications may present challenges, as static test datasets and manual review may be limited in identifying emergent, conversational anomalies. A multi-agent AI system may be configured in a closed-loop for automated validation. The system can, for example, utilize an end user persona simulator agent to generate prompts for a target model and a domain /regulatory expert adjudicator agent to evaluate the target model’s responses against a configurable rubric. A meta-analysis agent can analyze anomalies to identify underlying vulnerabilities, which may then be used to programmatically synthesize new adversarial personas. This adaptive process can generate evidence to support regulatory compliance and continuous performance monitoring for medical software algorithms systems.
View details
Understanding U.S. Users' Security and Privacy Transparency Needs for Consumer-Facing Generative AI
Jiaxun Cao
Yu Dong
Chunxi Zhan
Rithvik Neti
Pardis Emami-Naeini
USENIX Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) (2026)
Preview abstract
Users increasingly rely on consumer-facing generative AI (GenAI) for tasks ranging from everyday needs to sensitive use cases. Yet, it remains unclear whether and how existing security and privacy (S&P) communications in GenAI tools shape users’ adoption decisions and experiences. Understanding how users seek, interpret, and evaluate S&P information is critical for designing usable transparency that users can trust and act on. We conducted semi-structured interviews and design sessions with 21 U.S. GenAI users. Our findings suggest that available S&P information rarely drove initial adoption in practice, as participants often perceived it as incomplete, ineffective, or not credible. Instead, they relied on rough proxies (e.g., popularity) to infer S&P practices. After adoption, S&P uncertainty constrained participants’ willingness to use GenAI tools, especially for high-stakes purposes, and, in some cases, contributed to discontinued use. Participants therefore called for transparency that supports decisions and actions through trustworthy information (e.g., independent evaluations) and usable interfaces (e.g., on-demand disclosure). We categorize participants’ desired design practices into five dimensions to facilitate systematic future investigation into best practices. We conclude with recommendations for researchers, designers, and policymakers to improve S&P transparency in consumer-facing GenAI.
View details
Preview abstract
Statistical evaluation aims to estimate the generalization performance of a model using held-out i.i.d. test data sampled from the ground-truth distribution. In supervised learning settings such as classification, performance metrics such as error rate are well-defined, and test error reliably approximates population error given sufficiently large datasets. In contrast, evaluation is more challenging for generative models due to their open-ended nature: it is unclear which metrics are appropriate and whether such metrics can be reliably evaluated from finite samples. In this work, we introduce a theoretical framework for evaluating language models and establish evaluability results for commonly used metrics. We study two categories of metrics: test-based metrics, including integral probability metrics (IPMs), and similarity-based metrics, including Rényi and KL divergences. We show that IPMs with respect to any bounded test class can be evaluated from finite samples up to multiplicative and additive approximation errors. Moreover, when the test class has finite fat-shattering dimension, IPMs can be evaluated with arbitrary precision. In contrast, similarity-based metrics, including Rényi and KL divergences, are not evaluable from finite samples, as their values can be critically determined by rare events. We also analyze the potential and limitations of perplexity as an evaluation method.
View details
Looking to the brain to improve energy efficiency of AI
Taro Toyoizumi
Hakwan Lau
Michał Klincewicz
Seng Bum Michael Yoo
Megan Peters
taylor.w.webb@gmail.com
Current Biology (2026)
Preview abstract
Modern artificial intelligence (AI) systems have achieved remarkable capabilities, but at an extraordinary energy cost. Training and running large-scale models can consume vast resources, posing environmental, economic, and social challenges. In contrast, biological brains perform lifelong learning, adaptive control, and flexible reasoning using orders of magnitude less energy for learning and adaptation over a lifetime. What accounts for this difference -- and how can it guide future AI development? In this article, we identify key biological principles that support energy-efficient capacities in biological brains, and consider how they might inform the design of more sustainable artificial systems. We organize our analysis around three domains: architectural constraints, signaling strategies, and learning algorithms. In each domain, we discuss concrete observations from biology -- from cell to circuit to cognitive level -- and describe how current and emerging AI systems mirror or diverge from these motifs. One striking feature of biological energy optimization is often overlooked: that brains are remarkably stable in their energy usage across heterogeneous modes, suggesting they may minimize energy needs during active environmental processing through maximizing the utility of “rest-like” background processes. Overall, rather than advocating for biomimicry for its own sake, we argue for biologically informed engineering. Understanding how natural systems minimize energetic cost while maximizing flexibility may help us build AI that is not only powerful, but also efficient, equitable, and environmentally responsible.
View details
An AI system to help scientists write expert-level empirical software
Eser Aygün
Anastasiya Belyaeva
Gheorghe Comanici
Hao Cui
Renee Johnston
Zahra Shamsi
David Smalling
James Thompson
Sarah Martinson
Lai Wei
Yuchen Zhou
Qian-Ze Zhu
Matthew Abraham
Erica Brand
Anna Bulanova
Jeffrey Cardille
Chris Co
Scott Ellsworth
Grace Joseph
Malcolm Kane
Ryan Krueger
Johan Kartiwa
Jackson Cui
Paul Raccuglia
Julie Wang
Kat Chou
James Manyika
Lizzie Dorfman
Shibl Mourad
Nature (2026)
Preview abstract
The cycle of scientific discovery is frequently bottlenecked by the slow, manual creation of software to support computational experiments. To address this, we present Empirical Research Assistance (ERA), an AI system that creates expert-level scientific software whose goal is to maximize a quality metric. The system uses a Large Language Model (LLM) and Tree Search (TS) to systematically improve the quality metric and intelligently navigate the large space of possible solutions. ERA achieves expert-level results when it explores and integrates complex research ideas from external sources. The effectiveness of tree search is demonstrated across a diverse range of tasks. In bioinformatics, ERA discovered 40 novel methods for single-cell data analysis that outperformed the top human-developed methods on a public leaderboard. In epidemiology, ERA generated 14 models that outperformed the CDC ensemble and all other individual models for forecasting COVID-19 hospitalizations. ERA also produced expert-level software for geospatial analysis, neural activity prediction in zebrafish, and numerical solution of integrals, and a novel rule-based construction for time series forecasting. By devising and implementing novel solutions to diverse tasks, ERA represents a significant step towards accelerating scientific progress.
Keywords: Tree Search, Generative AI, Scorable Scientific Tasks, Empirical Software
View details
Impact of User Tonalities on Coding AI Model Performance and Behavior
Selva Jagannathan
Alec Mirchandani
Discover Artificial Intelligence (2026)
Preview abstract
This study investigates how different user tones—rude, polite, threatening, sarcastic, and neutral—affect the performance and behavior of coding AI models like Claude Opus 4.6, Qwen 3.5, and CodeGemma. We tracked technical metrics like correctness and adherence alongside behavioral traits such as sycophancy and defensiveness. Our findings show that tone has a direct impact on model reliability, with neutral prompts achieving the peak average correctness score (5.88 on a 1–10 scale). In contrast, non-neutral stimuli incurred a measurable "correctness tax": sarcasm led to a 9.0% drop in correctness and an 82.5% jump in sycophancy, while polite prompts caused a 4.7% decrease in correctness alongside a 36.4% increase in sycophancy. Threatening tones resulted in a 1.5% loss in correctness and made models 52.9% more defensive. These results suggest that user tonality is a key factor linking technical accuracy to behavioral stability. We recommend using professional, neutral prompting to ensure better logic and less bias in AI-assisted coding, and we propose "Tonal Resilience" as a necessary benchmark for future model evaluations.
View details
