Yale Song
Yale Song is a Research Scientist at Google. His research spans multimodal perception, reasoning, and generation, with a current focus on agentic frameworks for real-world problems. He earned his PhD in Computer Science from MIT and has held previous research positions at Meta FAIR, Microsoft Research, and Yahoo! Research.
Research Areas
Authored Publications
Sort By
PaperBanana: Automating Academic Illustration for AI Scientists
Dawei Zhu
Sujian Li
International Conference on Machine Learning (2026)
Preview abstract
While AI scientists increasingly automate research tasks through advanced language models, generating publication-ready illustrations remains a labor-intensive bottleneck in the scientific workflow. To lift this burden, we introduce PaperBanana, an agentic framework for automated generation of publication-ready academic diagrams. Powered by Nano-Banana-Pro and Gemini-3-Pro, PaperBanana orchestrates a team of specialized agents to retrieve reference examples, devise detailed plans for content and style, render the image, and perform iterative refinement based on self-critique. To rigorously evaluate our framework and address the absence of dedicated benchmarks for automated academic illustration, we introduce PaperBananaBench, comprising 292 test cases for methodology diagrams curated from NeurIPS 2025 publications.
Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that PaperBanana consistently outperforms vanilla Nano-Banana-Pro across all four dimensions—faithfulness, conciseness, readability, and aesthetics—achieving human-level performance. We further show that PaperBanana seamlessly extends to statistical plots through targeted adaptations. Collectively, PaperBanana enables AI scientists to fully automate the generation of publication-ready academic illustrations.
View details
GUIDE: A Benchmark for User Context Understanding and Assistance in GUI Workflow Videos
Saelyne Yang
Jaesang Yu
Yi-Hao Peng
Kevin Qinghong Lin
Jae Won Cho
Juho Kim
Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2026)
Preview abstract
Graphical User Interface (GUI) agents have the potential to assist users in interacting with complex software. While prior research has primarily focused on automating user actions through clicks and keystrokes, this paradigm overlooks human intention, where users value the ability to explore, iterate, and refine their ideas while maintaining agency.To move beyond automation and toward collaboration, GUI agents must understand what users are doing and why. We introduce GUIDE (GUI Understanding, Intent, and Help Decision Evaluation), a benchmark that evaluates AI models on their ability to perceive user behavior, infer intent, and provide assistance in open-ended GUI tasks. GUIDE consists of 67.5 hours of screen recordings from 120 novice user demonstrations with think-aloud narrations that surface user intent, across 10 complex software (e.g., PowerPoint, Photoshop). GUIDE defines three tasks—(i) Behavior State Detection, (ii) Intent Prediction, and (iii) Help Prediction that test a model’s ability to recognize behavior state, reason about goals, and decide when and how to help. Evaluations across eight state-of-the-art multimodal models reveal that all models struggled with the tasks, achieving only 44.6% and 55.0% accuracy on behavior state and help prediction. However, providing user context such as behavioral state and intent significantly improved the performance, raising help prediction by up to 50.2%. These results highlight the critical role of structured user understanding in effective assistance.Our benchmark provides a path toward GUI agents that go beyond automation to become truly user-aware collaborators.
View details
Preview abstract
Autonomous research agents can now produce competitive solutions and complete manuscripts, yet their papers routinely contain fabricated citations, method descriptions disconnected from the code, and scores on incorrect scales---failures invisible to evaluations that assess fluency rather than evidentiary grounding. The core problem is verifiability: no existing system maintains a traceable chain from each claim in the paper to its grounding evidence, and current evaluation protocols assess output fluency rather than evidentiary grounding. We address this with Chaine-of-Evidence (CoE), a verifiability standard requiring every claim to trace to its grounding evidence, and instantiate it in Scientist One, an end-to-end research system that maintains evidence chains natively, and CoE Audit, an evaluation protocol with four integrity checks targeting the most damaging chain failures. Auditing 60 papers from four systems, we find every baseline exhibits at least one failure: phantom citations at 4--25%, method-code alignment in at most 2/15 papers. Scientist One achieves zero phantom citations (0/830), the highest alignment rate (7/15), and competitive solver scores.
View details
