Publications
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.
Sort By
1 - 15 of 11309 publications
Preview abstract
Rank aggregation is a task of combining the rankings of items from multiple users into a single ranking that best represents the users' rankings. Alabi et al. (AAAI'22) presents differentially-private (DP) polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTASes) and 5-approximation algorithms with certain additive errors for the Kemeny rank aggregation problem in both central and local models. In this paper, we present improved DP PTASes with smaller additive error in the central model. Furthermore, we are first to study the footrule rank aggregation problem under DP. We give a near-optimal algorithm for this problem; as a corollary, this leads to 2-approximation algorithms with the same additive error as the 5-approximation algorithms of Alabi et al. for the Kemeny rank aggregation problem in both central and local models.
View details
Preview abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly integrated into healthcare, ensuring that this innovation helps to combat health inequities requires engaging marginalized communities in health AI futuring. However, little research has examined Black populations’ perspectives on the use of AI in health contexts, despite the widespread health inequities they experience–inequities that are already perpetuated by AI. Addressing this research gap, through qualitative workshops with 18 Black adults, we characterize participants’ cautious optimism for health AI addressing structural well-being barriers (e.g., by providing second opinions that introduce fairness into an unjust healthcare system), and their concerns that AI will worsen health inequities (e.g., through health AI biases they deemed inevitable and the problematic reality of having to trust healthcare providers to use AI equitably). We advance health AI research by articulating previously-unreported health AI perspectives from a population experiencing significant health inequities, and presenting key considerations for future work.
View details
Preview abstract
We prove the following asymptotically tight lower bound for k-color discrepancy: For any k ≥ 2, there exists a hypergraph with n vertices such that its k-color discrepancy is at least Ω(√n). This improves on the previously known lower bound of Ω(√n/ log k) due to Caragiannis et al. [CLS25]. As an application, we show that our result implies improved lower bounds for group fair division.
View details
Preview abstract
This talk addresses the challenges of operating Google's monitoring systems at scale, handling terabytes of telemetry data and preventing overload from diverse workloads. We'll explore how Google's internal client library and Monarch, its planet-scale time-series database, work together for cost-effective data collection. Key principles include a distributed push model, dynamic client-side data reduction, centralized retention, and periodic metric analysis. The session will then bridge these concepts to the open-source world, discussing our work with OpenTelemetry's OpAMP protocol to achieve similar scalable and efficient telemetry collection. Attendees will gain insights into adapting these principles for cost savings and learn about our collaboration with the OpAMP SIG to benefit the broader community.
View details
Preview abstract
Generative AI is reshaping software development, yet its psychological impact remains under-researched. During May and August 2025 we conducted reflexive thematic analysis of interviews with 12 senior engineers (≥5 years experience) recruited from Western technology hubs to explore shifts in professional identity. We identify a central transition from "coder to conductor," where AI acts as a cognitive partner. Key findings include: (1) a re-architecting of focus from implementation to strategy; (2) a shift in productivity metrics from output to impact; and (3) a dual-impact on agency, where AI empowers autonomy but threatens competence through de-skilling anxieties. These findings suggest that as implementation becomes commoditised, organisational training and career progression must prioritise architectural mastery and metacognitive oversight to ensure sustained developer motivation and system integrity.
View details
Approximate vs Precise: An experiment in what impacts user choice when apps request location access
Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’26), April 13–17, 2026, Barcelona, Spain (2026)
Preview abstract
User location data is highly sensitive, yet commonly requested by mobile apps for both core functionality and monetization. To improve user privacy, the major mobile platforms, Android and iOS, made changes so that when apps request precise location access, users can choose to share only their approximate location. However, the platforms have diverging interfaces: Android offers a side-by-side choice and iOS offers a corner toggle. This study evaluates which factors impact users’ choices when apps request location access via a randomized controlled experiment with 2579 US Android users. We tested the impact of app type, whether a reason for the request was provided, and the quality and content of the reason, including monetization. We do not find the reasons have an effect. Instead, we find users’ choices are impacted by app type and user demographics. We find that when users are given a side-by-side choice to allow approximate versus precise location access, they make reasonable choices. Of users who allowed access, the vast majority (90.7%) chose precise for a rideshare app versus the majority (71.3%) chose approximate for a local news app. Concerningly, the majority also allowed location access to a wallpaper app, and older users were significantly more likely to allow apps precise location access. We conclude by discussing implications for app platforms and future work.
View details
Preview abstract
This defensive publication describes a framework for multi-artificial intelligence (AI) orchestration that can be used to address potential limitations associated with reliance on single AI models, such as correlated systemic failures or cognitive blind spots. The described system is a cognitive orchestration framework that can function as a middleware layer to manage tasks across a heterogeneous ensemble of AI models. An orchestrator node can decompose a user request into a sequence of sub-tasks, which an arbitrage engine may then dynamically assign to suitable AI models based on certain factors, such as capability, cost, and latency. For certain tasks, such as those designated as high-risk, a byzantine consensus layer can route the task to multiple diverse models in parallel and may trigger a process, for example a 'cognitive debate,' which could be adjudicated by a third-party judge model to help resolve conflicting outputs. This framework can facilitate a more resilient system that may improve the accuracy and reliability of outputs when compared to some single-model architectures.
View details
ConvApparel: A Benchmark Dataset and Validation Framework for User Simulators in Conversational Recommenders
Guy Tennenholtz
Jihwan Jeong
The 19th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-26), Rabat, Morocco (2026)
Preview abstract
LLM-based user simulators are a scalable solution for improving conversational AI, but a critical realism gap undermines their effectiveness. To close this gap, we introduce a framework for building and validating high-fidelity simulators. We present a novel dataset of human-AI shopping conversations designed to capture a wide spectrum of user experiences. To measure fidelity, we propose a hybrid evaluation protocol that combines statistical alignment with a learned, discriminator-based Human-Likeness Score. Our most sophisticated simulator, trained via reinforcement learning with iterative critique, achieves a significant leap in realism. Critically, we demonstrate through counterfactual validation that our simulator—trained exclusively on optimal interactions—realistically adapts its behavior to suboptimal system responses, mirroring real user reactions and marking a key advance in creating reliable simulators for robust AI development.
View details
"It didn’t feel right but I needed a job so desperately": Understanding People's Emotions & Help Needs During Financial Scams
G. Jake Chanenson
Tara Matthews
Jessica McClearn
Sarah Meiklejohn
Mia Hassoun
2026
Preview abstract
Online financial scams represent a long-standing and serious threat for which people seek help. We present a study to understand people’s in situ motivations for engaging with scams and the help needs they express before, during, and after encountering a scam. We identify the main emotions scammers exploited (e.g., fear, hope) and characterize how they did so. We examine factors—such as financial insecurity and legal precarity—which elevate people’s risk of engaging with specific scams and experiencing harm. We indicate when people sought help and describe their help-seeking needs and emotions at different stages of the scam. We discuss how these needs could be met through the design of contextually-specific prevention, diagnostic, mitigation, and recovery interventions.
View details
From Correctness to Collaboration: A Human-Centered Taxonomy of AI Agent Behavior in Software Engineering
Sherry Y. Shi
Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’26), ACM, New York, NY, USA (2026)
Preview abstract
The ongoing transition of Large Language Models in software engineering from code generators into autonomous agents requires a shift in how we define and measure success. While models are becoming more capable, the industry lacks a clear understanding of the behavioral norms that make an agent effective in collaborative software development in the enterprise. This work addresses this gap by presenting a taxonomy of desirable agent behaviors, synthesized from 91 sets of user-defined rules for coding agents. We identify four core expectations: Adhere to Standards and Processes, Ensure Code Quality and Reliability, Solve Problems Effectively, and Collaborate with the User. These findings offer a concrete vocabulary for agent behavior, enabling researchers to move beyond correctness-only benchmarks and design evaluations that reflect the realities of professional software development in large enterprises.
View details
Preview abstract
This disclosure describes systems and methods for a multi-agent framework that can automate and scale cognitive work. The framework can, for example, use a cognitive assembly line of specialized computational agents to perform tasks such as research and drafting. A beneficial component could be an adversarial review panel (ARP), which is a multi-agent review system where distinct agent personas critique a generated draft from varied perspectives. The structured feedback from the ARP can be used to automatically iterate on and refine the work product. This approach can improve the intellectual rigor of generated content and reduce the time required for production, which may allow human operators to focus on activities such as strategic oversight and final validation.
View details
XProf: An Open, Scalable and Extensible Profiling System for the Modern ML Stack
Naveen Kumar
Jose Baiocchi Paredes
Scott Goodson
Kelvin Le
Yin Zhang
Kan Cai
Jiten Thakkar
Sai Ganesh Bandiatmakuri
Yogesh SY
Ani Udipi
Vikas Aggarwal
Ninth Conference on Machine Learning and Systems (2026)
Preview abstract
Optimizing Large Models across thousands of accelerators requires deep system expertise. To address modern machine learning (ML) optimization needs, we present XProf, the ML profiler for the OpenXLA ecosystem. XProf delivers actionable optimization suggestions and in-depth performance analysis, empowering ML researchers and framework users to improve efficiency without specialized systems knowledge. XProf provides a unified, full-stack view of both host (CPU) and device (accelerator - TPUs/GPUs) performance, leveraging tools like the Roofline Model for comprehensive analysis. XProf’s distributed architecture is designed to monitor thousands of chips with minimal workload overhead (<1%). This architecture is made pluggable through the open-source PJRT C API extension, which has facilitated its adoption by third-party accelerator vendors. XProf has been instrumental in achieving significant efficiency gains at Google and winning MLPerf submissions. This paper presents the design and architecture of XProf, showcases its differentiating tools and capabilities, and highlights its impact within Google and across the industry as a state of the art ML profiler. XProf is available as part of the OpenXLA project at https://github.com/openxla/xprof.
View details
Preview abstract
We introduce a new context-enriched time series forecasting benchmark TimesX. TimesX contains a wide selection of high-quality real-world time series and diverse textual contexts from an automated generating pipeline, which helps address three main issues of existing benchmarks: (1) poor generalization due to low data volume and data being synthetic, (2) restricted forms of context, and (3) an inability to mitigate data leakage. We conduct a thorough empirical study of current multimodal solutions on TimesX. Our results suggest that most multimodal solutions that work well on existing benchmarks may fail on TimesX. In contrast, simple ensemble methods that leverage the rich textual context can outperform strong unimodal baselines and other multimodal baselines.
** Below this is what was submitted to ITP. **
We create a real world multimodal time-series forecasting benchmark that encompasses diverse domains and regions. Each time-series is annotated by various kinds of contexts like metadata, date and holiday information, dynamic events related to the time-series. This is sufficiently more advanced than other available benchmarks which rely wither on static metadata alone or synthetic examples. This forms a test bed for multimodal forecasting. We also present some baseline results showing that ensembles of publicly available LLMs and time-series foundation models can demonstrate non-trivial performance on this bechmark.
View details
Preview abstract
Browser fingerprinting is the practice of tracking users across the Web by collecting attributes from their devices and combining them to create unique identifiers. This practice poses major privacy risks to users, and more than a decade of research has quantified fingerprinting risks due to various attributes, leading browser developers to implement many privacy-enhancing changes. Early work used Shannon entropy to quantify risks. However, Shannon entropy can grow with dataset size, limiting the ability to compare datasets and results. Researchers then introduced normalized entropy as a measure for comparing browser fingerprinting datasets of different sizes and numerous works followed using normalized entropy for this purpose.
We identify and address a resulting problem in the fingerprinting literature. We show normalized entropy is ill-suited to compare datasets of different sizes — it decreases as dataset size increases. We show this both analytically and empirically, leveraging a recently published dataset of browser attributes commonly used for fingerprinting.
Given the unmet need for a better fingerprinting risk measure, we define a minimal set of desired properties for such a measure: scale-invariance, monotonicity and estimability. We then propose to use Tsallis entropy as a more interpretable fingerprinting risk measure. We evaluate Shannon, normalized, and Tsallis entropy with respect to the properties, and prove that only Tsallis entropy satisfies all of them.
View details
Reasoning-Driven Synthetic Data Generation and Evaluation
Tim R. Davidson
Benoit Seguin
Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2026)
Preview abstract
Although many AI applications of interest require specialized multi-modal models, relevant data to train such models is inherently scarce or inaccessible. Filling these gaps with human annotators is prohibitively expensive, error-prone, and time-consuming, leading model builders to increasingly consider synthetic data as a scalable alternative. However, existing synthetic data generation methods often rely on manual prompts, evolutionary algorithms, or extensive seed data from the target distribution — limiting their scalability, explainability, and control. In this paper, we introduce Simula: a novel reasoning-driven framework for data generation and evaluation. It employs a seedless, agentic approach to generate synthetic datasets at scale, allowing users to define desired dataset characteristics through an explainable and controllable process that enables fine-grained resource allocation. We show the efficacy of our approach on a variety of datasets, rigorously testing both intrinsic and downstream properties. Our work (1) offers guidelines for synthetic data mechanism design, (2) provides insights into generating and evaluating synthetic data at scale, and (3) unlocks new opportunities for developing and deploying AI in domains where data scarcity or privacy concerns are paramount.
View details
