Publications

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

people standing in front of a screen with images and a chipboard

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

Sort By
  • Title
  • Title, descending
  • Year
  • Year, descending
1 - 15 of 11422 publications
Improved Differentially Private Algorithms for Rank Aggregation
Phanu Vajanopath
Quentin Hillebrand
Vorapong Suppakitpaisarn
AAAI (2026)
Preview abstract Rank aggregation is a task of combining the rankings of items from multiple users into a single ranking that best represents the users' rankings. Alabi et al. (AAAI'22) presents differentially-private (DP) polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTASes) and 5-approximation algorithms with certain additive errors for the Kemeny rank aggregation problem in both central and local models. In this paper, we present improved DP PTASes with smaller additive error in the central model. Furthermore, we are first to study the footrule rank aggregation problem under DP. We give a near-optimal algorithm for this problem; as a corollary, this leads to 2-approximation algorithms with the same additive error as the 5-approximation algorithms of Alabi et al. for the Kemeny rank aggregation problem in both central and local models. View details
Preview abstract Context: The cost of frontier large language model inference has fallen by two orders of magnitude since 2023, yet the techno-economic forces governing AI value capture remain poorly understood. No existing work provides a unified, multi-layer framework connecting hardware physics to commercial pricing to actuarial constraints. Objectives: This survey aims to establish that Generative AI (GenAI) monetization is structurally bound by five interdependent techno-economic layers: (1) the physical constraints of memory bandwidth and compute, (2) deflationary architectural innovations, (3) the algorithmic economics of inference-time compute, (4) the verification economics governing outcome-based pricing, and (5) the macro-legal realities of enterprise liability. Methods: We conduct a Multivocal Literature Review (MLR) adapting the PRISMA protocol, synthesizing peer-reviewed and grey literature sources—vendor documentation, SLAs, and API pricing data (2022–2026). Two reviewers independently screened all records (Cohen’s κ ≥ 0.81 across all decision stages). Results: We contribute four primary artifacts. First, the Viability Inequality, an analytical model formalizing the conditions under which outcome-based AI pricing is economically sustainable. Second, the Billing Fallacy: aggregate cost growth is driven by Agentic Recursion, not quadratic attention complexity. Third, the Verifiability Bifurcation: objective task domains enable outcome pricing, while subjective domains depend on proxy-based models. Fourth, the Multi-Layer Techno-Economic Taxonomy (M-TET), a unified five-layer framework mapping the full monetization stack from silicon-anchored token pricing through actuarial risk ceilings. Conclusion: GenAI monetization is not a commercial pricing exercise but a dynamic negotiation across hardware, algorithmic, economic, and actuarial layers. In subjective and hybrid task domains, the binding constraint on outcome-based pricing is the cost of verification, not generation. AI value capture depends on engineering low-cost, high-fidelity Verification Engines. View details
Looking to the brain to improve energy efficiency of AI
Taro Toyoizumi
Hakwan Lau
Michał Klincewicz
Seng Bum Michael Yoo
Megan Peters
taylor.w.webb@gmail.com
Current Biology (2026)
Preview abstract Modern artificial intelligence (AI) systems have achieved remarkable capabilities, but at an extraordinary energy cost. Training and running large-scale models can consume vast resources, posing environmental, economic, and social challenges. In contrast, biological brains perform lifelong learning, adaptive control, and flexible reasoning using orders of magnitude less energy for learning and adaptation over a lifetime. What accounts for this difference -- and how can it guide future AI development? In this article, we identify key biological principles that support energy-efficient capacities in biological brains, and consider how they might inform the design of more sustainable artificial systems. We organize our analysis around three domains: architectural constraints, signaling strategies, and learning algorithms. In each domain, we discuss concrete observations from biology -- from cell to circuit to cognitive level -- and describe how current and emerging AI systems mirror or diverge from these motifs. One striking feature of biological energy optimization is often overlooked: that brains are remarkably stable in their energy usage across heterogeneous modes, suggesting they may minimize energy needs during active environmental processing through maximizing the utility of “rest-like” background processes. Overall, rather than advocating for biomimicry for its own sake, we argue for biologically informed engineering. Understanding how natural systems minimize energetic cost while maximizing flexibility may help us build AI that is not only powerful, but also efficient, equitable, and environmentally responsible. View details
Preview abstract Prior work synthesizes tool-use LLM datasets by first generating a user query, followed by complex tool-use annotations like depth-first search (DFS). This leads to inevitable annotation failures and low efficiency in data generation. We introduce ToolGrad, an agentic framework that inverts this paradigm. ToolGrad first constructs valid tool-use chains through an iterative process guided by textual "gradients", and then synthesizes corresponding user queries. This "answer-first" approach led to ToolGrad-500, a dataset generated with more complex tool use, lower cost, and almost 100% pass rate. Experiments show that ToolGrad models outperform those trained on expensive baseline datasets and proprietary LLMs. View details
GenAI on Google Cloud: Enterprise Generative AI Systems and AI Agents
Ayo Adedeji
Lavi Nigam
Stephanie Gervasi
O'Reilly Media, Inc. (2026)
Preview abstract In today's AI landscape, success depends not just on prompting large language models but on orchestrating them into intelligent systems that are scalable, compliant, and cost-effective. GenAI on Google Cloud is your hands-on guide to bridging that gap. Whether you're an ML engineer or an enterprise leader, this book offers a practical game plan for taking agentic systems from prototype to production. Written by practitioners with deep experience in AgentOps, data engineering, and GenAI infrastructure, this guide takes you through real-world workflows from data prep and deployment to orchestration and integration. With concrete examples, field-tested frameworks, and honest insights, you'll learn how to build agentic systems that deliver measurable business value. > Bridge the production gap that stalls 90% of vertical AI initiatives using systematic deployment frameworks > Navigate AgentOps complexities through practical guidance on orchestration, evaluation, and responsible AI practices > Build robust multimodal systems for text, images, and video using proven agent architectures > Optimize for scale with strategies for cost management, performance tuning, and production monitoring View details
TDXRay: Microarchitectural Side-Channel Analysis of Intel TDX for Real-World Workloads
Tristan Hornetz
Hosein Yavarzadeh
Albert Cheu
Adria Gascon
Lukas Gerlach
Michael Schwarz
Ruiyi Zhang
IEEE Security & Privacy (S&P) (2026)
Preview abstract Confidential computing with VM-based trusted execution environments (TEEs) promises to protect code and data from a privileged cloud operator, enabling privacy-preserving workloads ranging from medical analytics to AI inference. However, most deployments exclude microarchitectural side channels from their threat model, shifting the burden to application developers who lack practical, general-purpose tools to assess (let alone mitigate) leakage. This gap is problematic: host-observable effects such as page-fault patterns, shared-cache contention, performance-counter surrogates (where available), and fine-grained timing primitives (e.g., MWAIT) can still reveal high-level secrets even when memory remains encrypted. We present TDXRay, an open-source framework that systematizes the evaluation of side-channel risk for confidential VMs in Intel TDX. TDXRay exposes unified interfaces to exercise and measure several attack primitives—including controlled-channel attacks via page tables, cache-based contention/occupancy probes, performance-counter–derived signals, and timing channels—against unmodified guest workloads. Using TDXRay, we build two end-to-end case studies: (1) a classic AES T-table attack in which a malicious hypervisor recovers the secret key from access-pattern leakage, and (2) an LLaMA inference attack in which the host infers user prompts by monitoring memory accesses during tokenization and embedding lookups. Across both, we show that a host with no direct access to guest memory can reconstruct sensitive information by observing only externalized microarchitectural signals. View details
Preview abstract Large language models (LLMs) are trained on web-scale corpora that exhibit steep power-law distributions, in which the distribution of knowledge is highly long-tailed, with most appearing infrequently. While scaling has improved average-case performance, persistent failures on low-frequency, domain-specific, cultural, and temporal knowledge remain poorly characterized. This paper develops a structured taxonomy and analysis of long-tail knowledge in large language models, synthesizing prior work across technical and sociotechnical perspectives. We organize the literature along four complementary axes: how long-tail knowledge is defined, the mechanisms by which it is lost or distorted during training and inference, the technical interventions proposed to mitigate these failures, and the implications of these failures for fairness, accountability, transparency, and user trust. We further examine how existing evaluation practices obscure tail behavior and complicate accountability for rare but consequential failures. The paper concludes by identifying open challenges related to privacy, sustainability, and governance that constrain long-tail knowledge representation. Taken together, this paper provides a unifying conceptual framework for understanding how long-tail knowledge is defined, lost, evaluated, and manifested in deployed language model systems. View details
Preview abstract One of the most exciting developments in the time series space over the last few years has been the advances in probabilistic forecasting capabilities, both in terms of modeling approaches and available tools. Yet adoption of probabilistic forecasting methods has been slow amongst the wider forecasting community, and data science teams and business stakeholders are missing out on the opportunities provided by more accurate characterization of the uncertainty, including their correlations. In this presentation, we will point out that most established point forecasting approaches can be easily augmented to produce distributional forecasts, making it very hard to distinguish between the two types of approaches in practice. The gravitation towards using a single number as a forecast due to its explainability and operability makes the concrete benefits and ROI of upgrading to probabilistic forecasting approaches ambiguous at best, thus contributing to the challenges with adopting the newer probabilistic models. We will then argue for a reframing of the probabilistic vs. point forecasting distinction, not in terms of modeling approaches and pipeline configurations, but as a fundamental first principles based distinction based on the available data and the use case requirements. Probabilistic forecasting should not be seen as an add-on to point forecasting, nor as an opportunity for an incremental improvement on uncertainty bounds. It should be clear that certain applications mandate probabilistic forecasting because point forecasting, no matter how accurate, will lead to wrong decision making. This distinction should be analogous to how the distinction between regression and classification use cases is defined, or the distinction between clustering and dimensionality reduction use cases is defined. We will also discuss possible criteria for this first principles based distinction between point forecasting use cases and probabilistic use cases, and argue for why such a reframing might be beneficial for practitioners and business users. This article aims to initiate a discussion on making probabilistic forecasting as a principle that is more accessible to practitioners and non-technical stakeholders; that it is not an improvement to point forecasts: it is a critical must-have for many (or most) business forecasting use cases. View details
Abstain and Validate: A Dual-LLM Policy for Reducing Noise in Agentic Program Repair
José Cambronero
Michele Tufano
Renyao Wei
Grant Uy
Chin-Jung Liu
Shiying Pan
Satish Chandra
ICSE-SEIP '26: Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 48th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice, ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), New York, NY, USA (2026), 118 – 129
Preview abstract Agentic automated program repair (APR) is increasingly being used to tackle complex, repository-level bugs in both academic and industry settings. However, changes made by the agent still need to be reviewed by a human before committing them to the codebase to ensure the change correctly fixes the bug. Showing unlikely patches to developers can lead to substantial noise, wasting valuable developer time and decreasing trust in all automated code changes. We introduce two complementary LLM-based policies to reduce such noise: bug abstention and patch critic policies. Bug abstention allows us to exclude bugs that the agentic APR system is unlikely to fix and the patch critic rejects patches that are unlikely to be a good fix for the given bug. We evaluate both policies on three sets of bugs collected from Google’s codebase and agent trajectories generated by an agentic APR system in use at Google. We introduce filtered success rates, where we compute performance after removing trajectories rejected by our policies. On a set of 174 human-reported bugs, abstention and critic can raise filtered success rates up to 13 percentage points and 15 percentage points, respectively, and up to 29 percentage points in combination. For null pointer exceptions and sanitizer-reported bugs with machine-generated bug reports or known reproduction tests, we show the same critic policy can be used to improve average single-sample success rates. View details
Marginalized Bundle Adjustment: Multi-View Camera Pose from Monocular Depth Estimates
Shengjie Zhu
Xiaoming Liu
Vincent Chu
International Conference on 3D Vision (2026)
Preview abstract Structure-from-Motion (SfM) is a classical 3D vision task for recovering camera parameters and scene geometry from multi-view images. Recent advances in deep learning enable accurate monocular depth estimation (MDE) that infers structure from a single image without depending on camera motion. But integrating MDE into SfM remains challenging. Unlike classical triangulated sparse pointclouds, MDE produces dense depthmaps with significantly higher error variance. Inspired by modern RANSAC estimators, we propose a Marginalized Bundle Adjustment (MBA) to accommodate MDE error variance with its density. With MBA, we show that MDE depthmaps are sufficiently accurate to support SoTA or competitive results in Structure-from-Motion and camera relocalization. Our benchmark demonstrates consistent remarkable results from two-view, few-frames small multiview, to thousands-frames large multiview system. Our method highlights the significant potential of MDE on multi-view 3D vision tasks. View details
Towards A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Reliable Patch Evaluation using an LLM-as-a-Judge
Renyao Wei
Michele Tufano
José Cambronero
AI-SQE '26: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on AI for Software Quality Evaluation - Judgment, Metrics, Benchmarks, and Beyond, ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), New York, NY, USA (2026), pp. 19 - 28
Preview abstract Reliable evaluation is crucial for advancing Automated Program Repair (APR), but prevailing benchmarks that rely on execution-based evaluation methods (pass@k) often fail to capture the patch quality required for real-world adoption. This creates a significant gap between automated metrics and true patch validity (valid@k), a discrepancy observed across several state-of-the-art techniques. To develop a scalable solution for measuring valid@k, we first study the human evaluation process itself. While manual assessment can determine validity, we find it suffers from poor inter-rater reliability (Fleiss' Kappa k=0.307). Our foundational insight is that this inconsistency is largely resolved when evaluators use a shared, high-quality rubric, which significantly improves agreement. Building on this finding, we propose an LLM-as-a-Judge framework that operationalizes rubric-guided evaluation at scale. Our method employs a human-in-the-loop workflow where an LLM first generates a candidate rubric for a given bug, which a human expert then reviews and refines into a "golden" evaluation standard. This golden rubric is then used by an LLM judge to assess the validity of candidate patches. In an evaluation on 48 bugs and 115 patches, our LLM judge demonstrates substantial agreement with the consensus of human developers. This work contributes a scalable and reliable methodology for approximating valid@k, providing a much-needed high-fidelity signal for measuring true progress in the field of automated program repair. View details
Preview abstract Responsive user interfaces enable dynamically adjusting user interfaces based on device-specific aspects such as screen size, aspect ratio, display resolution, etc. However, traditional responsive design fails to account for different types of constraints of a user and task criticality of the task being performed via the UI. Misalignment between the UI design, user context and task criticality can lead to user error. This disclosure describes techniques, implemented with user permission, for dynamically modifying the layout, information density, and/or interactive physics of a user interface based on a dual-factor analysis of user cognitive state and task criticality. The user's cognitive state can be inferred from behavioral telematics. Task criticality can be inferred from semantic analysis. The information density and other parameters of a user interface are automatically adjusted based on such analyses. Such adjustments include applying or relaxing restrictions on interactivity and adjusting visual prominence of various UI elements to adjust the information density of the user interface. The adjustments can also include adjusting friction as appropriate, hiding certain aspects of the user interface, or other types of adjustments. View details
Identifying Hearing Difficulty Moments in Conversational Audio
Jack Collins
Adrian Buzea
Chris Collier
Alejandro Ballesta Rosen
Julian Maclaren
Kelly Miles
Simon Carlile
Trends in Hearing (2026)
Preview abstract Individuals regularly experience Hearing Difficulty Moments in everyday conversation. Identifying Hearing Difficulty Moments has particular significance in the field of hearing assistive technology where timely interventions are key for real-time hearing assistance. In this article, we propose and compare machine learning solutions for the temporal detection of segments containing Hearing Difficulty Moments in conversational audio. We show that audio language models, through their multimodal reasoning capabilities, can achieve state-of-the-art results for this task, significantly outperforming a simple automatic speech recognition (ASR) hotword heuristic and a more conventional fine-tuning approach with Wav2Vec, an audio-only input architecture that is state-of-the-art for ASR. View details
SAC133 - SSAC Comments on Proposed Root KSK Algorithm Rollover
Wes Hardaker
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) Reports and Advisories (2026), pp. 9
Preview abstract The SSAC supports the transition from RSA with SHA-256 (Algorithm 8) to ECDSA P-256 with SHA-256 (Algorithm 13) as the cryptographic algorithm for the RootKSK. The root zone has relied on RSA-based algorithms since DNSSEC signing began in 2010. The algorithm did not change during the first KSK rollover in 2018 or during the second rollover currently underway and scheduled to complete in October 2026. Establishing a clear and predictable process for algorithm transitions is essential to the long-term security of the root zone, and the SSAC observes that the proposal addresses the Recommendation 23 of the SSR2 Review accordingly. The SSAC notes that the proposal builds upon the Root Zone DNSSEC Algorithm Rollover Study published by ICANN in May 2024, which assessed resolver and authoritative server support for alternative algorithms, analyzed rollover methodologies, and evaluated operational risks. The SSAC finds that the proposal implements the study’s recommendations. The SSAC also notes that this proposal is consistent with the SSAC’s prior work on DNSSEC key rollover, including SAC063, SAC073, SAC102, and SAC108. The SSAC encourages ICANN to proceed with this rollover. Specific comments on the proposal’s methodology, timeline, and operational readiness follow View details
What does your wearable know about the festive season?
Justin Phillips
Abram Schönfeldt
YongSuk Cho
Conor Heneghan
Robert Harle
(2026)
Preview abstract As we reach the end of the year and people look forward to spending quality time with loved ones, here at Fitbit, we wonder what our Pixel watches and Fitbit trackers can tell us about how we are spending the festive season. We looked at the data of 11.8 million of our users all over the world between January 2022 and July 2025. Here are the key stats we wanted to share with you! View details
×