Daniel Roggen
I am passionate about projects at the interface between intelligent embedded systems and large scale data science and in particular projects related to machine perception.
I am particularly active in wearable computing and computational behavioral analytics - the art of understanding human behavior by the right combination of sensors, signal processing, machine learning and AI techniques. I am also interested in leveraging Google's large scale datasets to understand user health trajectories.
Research Areas
Authored Publications
Sort By
Pixel Watch: Robust Heart Rate Sensing from Multipath PPG and On-Device Deep Learning Trained on 10,000 hours of Free-Living and Fitness Data
Megan Walker
Yojan Patel
Shyam Tailor
Matt Wimmer
Brennan Garrett
Dan Howe
Abhinuv Pitale
Hamed Vavadi
Tien Le
Steve Diamond
Oleksiy Vyalov
Vik Sharma
Pete Richards
Tracy Giest
Erika Siegel
Tuan Phan
Sam Mravca
Derrick Vickers
Benjamin Stone
Katarina Vukosavljević
Justin Phillips
YongSuk Cho
Stefanie Hollidge
Antony Siahaan
Soren Brage
Shwetak Patel
Robert Harle
IEEE Sensors Letters (2026)
Preview abstract
The Pixel Watch 2 (PW2) is the first Google smartwatch to combine multipath photoplethysmography (PPG) with deep learning-based heart rate inference, designed to significantly improve sensing accuracy during motion-heavy activities. The device processes 10 optical channels using an on-device, 15-layer temporally dilated convolutional neural network (~300K parameters) to yield a 1 Hz heart rate output. Crucial to this model's performance was its training on a massive dataset comprising 10,000 hours of data from 962 participants, curated from a broader corpus of controlled and free-living activities. We evaluated the PW2's sensing performance across two independent validation sets: an in-house fitness dataset (229 participants, 250 hours) and an external free-living dataset (27 participants, 1000+ hours). The system achieved 95% Limits of Agreement of -10.34 to 8.66 BPM during exercise and -6.57 to 7.48 BPM during free-living activities, demonstrating substantially tighter error margins than previous Google devices. Finally, we discuss key design lessons, emphasizing that large-scale deep learning was instrumental in fully leveraging multipath PPG hardware over traditional signal processing approaches.
View details
What does your wearable know about the festive season?
Justin Phillips
Katarina Vukosavljević
Abram Schönfeldt
YongSuk Cho
Conor Heneghan
Robert Harle
(2026)
Preview abstract
As we reach the end of the year and people look forward to spending quality time with loved ones, here at Fitbit, we wonder what our Pixel watches and Fitbit trackers can tell us about how we are spending the festive season. We looked at the data of 11.8 million of our users all over the world between January 2022 and July 2025. Here are the key stats we wanted to share with you!
View details
Preview abstract
PURPOSE: To introduce Cardio Load (CL), a metric quantifying cardiovascular work from all activities across the day, and to investigate its distribution by age, gender, and workout profiles. CL adapts the Training Impulse (TRIMP) model by leveraging continuous heart rate and movement data from wearables, enabling minute-level intensity estimation. We also discuss the derivation of weekly target loads, intended to guide fitness maintenance.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 31.2 million hours of wrist-worn wearable data collected over a six-week period. The dataset comprised a 40,000-subject subset (37.9% female) of consenting Google Pixel Watch® users in the United States, aged 18 to 80 years (18-39: 41.8%, 40-59: 43.5%, 60+: 14.6%). Measured data included minute-interval heart rate averages, resting and maximum heart rates, minute-interval averaged accelerometer log energy, and manually-logged or auto-detected activity types. Cardio Load scores and target loads were calculated daily for each subject and compared across age and gender. We also compared the proportions of CL gained during workouts and incidental daily activities for these groups.
RESULTS: Overall, the study population's mean ± SD weekly CL scores were 221 ± 156 (female) and 259 ± 169 (male). Median weekly Cardio Load (CL) values exhibited consistency for individuals between 30 and 75 years of age. When analyzed in five-year age groups, the coefficient of variation (CV%) of median weekly CL values within this age range was less than 4.5%, with younger and older subjects demonstrating higher and lower median CL, respectively. The median proportion of CL accumulated during structured workouts versus incidental daily activity was 41.0% (female) and 49.0% (male) for all subjects, though this varied considerably with average weekly workout duration. CV% of weekly target load and daily target load over 6 weeks was 23.6% and 35.2% respectively.
CONCLUSION: Cardio Load provides a continuous quantification of activity load from wearables, acknowledging both structured workouts and everydayincidental activity. CL is equitably rewarded for age ranges spanning 30-75 years. Weekly target loads were found to have little measurement variability and be more consistent and, consequently, more practical for planning training and physical activity than daily targets.
View details
