Tomas Pfister
Tomas Pfister is the Head of Cloud AI Research. He came to Google from Apple where he cofounded Apple's central AI research group and published Apple’s first research paper that won the Best Paper Award at CVPR’17. Tomas’ key scientific achievements have been proposing a method to improve the realism of synthetic images; developing the first automated method to detect facial micro-expressions; and inventing a new way for neural networks to exploit spatiotemporal structure. He is currently exploring learning from small amount of labeled data (using techniques such as generative models, few-shot learning, transfer learning) and explainability/interpretability of deep learning models, and is particularly excited about the potential of AI in healthcare & education. His research has laid the foundation for several applications such as Face ID in iPhone X, autonomous driving, human pose estimation, detecting facial micro-expressions & translating sign language. Tomas did his PhD in deep learning with Prof Andrew Zisserman at Oxford University and bachelor’s degree in computer science at Cambridge University. He is the recipient of the Forbes 30 Under 30 award, and has received over 40 research awards, including 3 best paper awards, with numerous publications in top AI research venues. His work has been frequently featured in mainstream media, including Forbes, BusinessInsider & Wired.
Authored Publications
Sort By
Preview abstract
Large language models (LLMs), optimized through human feedback, have rapidly emerged as a leading paradigm for developing intelligent conversational assistants. However, despite their strong performance across many benchmarks, LLM-based agents might still lack conversational skills such as disambiguation -- when they are faced with ambiguity, they often overhedge or implicitly guess users' true intents rather than asking clarification questions. Under task-specific settings, high-quality conversation samples are often limited, constituting a bottleneck for LLMs' ability to learn optimal dialogue action policies. We propose Action-Based Contrastive Self-Training (ACT), a quasi-online preference optimization algorithm based on Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), that enables data-efficient dialogue policy learning in multi-turn conversation modeling. We demonstrate ACT's efficacy under data-efficient tuning scenarios, even when there is no action label available, using multiple real-world conversational tasks: tabular-grounded question-answering, machine reading comprehension, and AmbigSQL, a novel task for disambiguating information-seeking requests for complex SQL generation towards data analysis agents. Additionally, we propose evaluating LLMs' ability to function as conversational agents by examining whether they can implicitly recognize and reason about ambiguity in conversation. ACT demonstrates substantial conversation modeling improvements over standard tuning approaches like supervised fine-tuning and DPO.
View details
Preview abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements in natural language understanding, generation, and manipulation of text-based data. However, one major issue towards their widespread deployment in the real world is that they can generate "hallucinated" answers that are not factual. Towards this end, this paper focuses on improving grounding from a holistic perspective with a novel framework, AGREE. We start with the design of a test time adaptation capability that takes into account the support information generated in self-grounded responses. To effectively enable this capability, we propose that the model tuning needs to be redesigned with a novel tuning objective mimicking the test time adaptation setup for grounding. This tuning on top of the pre-trained LLMs requires small amount of data that need to be constructed in a particular way to learn the grounding information, for which we introduce a data construction method. Our results show that AGREE pushes the state-of-the-art in grounding, demonstrated across many datasets.
View details
ASPEST: Bridging the Gap Between Active Learning and Selective Prediction
Somesh Jha
Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR) (2024)
Preview abstract
Selective prediction aims to learn a reliable model that abstains from making predictions when uncertain. These predictions can then be deferred to humans for further evaluation. As an everlasting challenge for machine learning, in many real-world scenarios, the distribution of test data is different from the training data. This results in more inaccurate predictions, and often increased dependence on humans, which can be difficult and expensive. Active learning aims to lower the overall labeling effort, and hence human dependence, by querying the most informative examples. Selective prediction and active learning have been approached from different angles, with the connection between them missing. In this work, we introduce a new learning paradigm, active selective prediction, which aims to query more informative samples from the shifted target domain while increasing accuracy and coverage. For this new paradigm, we propose a simple yet effective approach, ASPEST, that utilizes ensembles of model snapshots with self-training with their aggregated outputs as pseudo labels. Extensive experiments on numerous image, text and structured datasets, which suffer from domain shifts, demonstrate that ASPEST can significantly outperform prior work on selective prediction and active learning (e.g. on the MNIST→SVHN benchmark with the labeling budget of 100, ASPEST improves the AUACC metric from 79.36% to 88.84%) and achieves more optimal utilization of humans in the loop.
View details
CodecLM: Aligning Language Models with Tailored Synthetic Data
Chun-Liang Li
Jin Miao
NAACL 2024
Preview abstract
Instruction tuning has emerged as the key in aligning large language models (LLMs) with specific task instructions, thereby mitigating the discrepancy between the next-token prediction objective and users' actual goals. To reduce the labor and time cost to collect or annotate data by humans, researchers start to explore the use of LLMs to generate instruction-aligned synthetic data. Recent works focus on generating diverse instructions and applying LLM to increase instruction complexity, often neglecting downstream use cases. It remains unclear how to tailor high-quality data to elicit better instruction-following abilities in different target instruction distributions and LLMs. To this end, we introduce CodecLM, a general framework for adaptively generating high-quality synthetic data for LLM alignment with different downstream instruction distributions and LLMs. Drawing on the Encode-Decode principles, we use LLMs as codecs to guide the data generation process. We first encode seed instructions into metadata, which are concise keywords generated on-the-fly to capture the target instruction distribution, and then decode metadata to create tailored instructions. We also introduce Self-Rubrics and Contrastive Filtering during decoding to tailor data-efficient samples. Extensive experiments on four open-domain instruction following benchmarks validate the effectiveness of CodecLM over the current state-of-the-arts.
View details
Found in the middle: Calibrating Positional Attention Bias Improves Long Context Utilization
Cheng-Yu Hsieh
Yung-Sung Chuang
Chun-Liang Li
Abhishek Kumar
James Glass
Alexander Ratner
Ranjay Krishna
2024
Preview abstract
Large language models (LLMs), even when specifically trained to process long input contexts, struggle to capture relevant information located in the middle of their input. This phenomenon has been known as the lost-in-the-middle problem. In this work, we make three contributions. First, we set out to understand the factors that cause this phenomenon. In doing so, we establish a connection between lost-in-the-middle to LLMs' intrinsic attention bias: LLMs exhibit a U-shaped attention bias where the tokens at the beginning and at the end of its input receive higher attention, regardless of their relevance. Second, we mitigate this positional bias through a calibration mechanism, found-in-the-middle, that allows the model to attend to contexts faithfully according to their relevance, even though when they are in the middle. Third, we show found-in-the-middle not only achieves better performance in locating relevant information within a long context, but also eventually leads to improved retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) performance across various tasks, outperforming existing methods by up to 15 percentage points. These findings open up future directions in understanding LLM attention bias and its potential consequences.
View details
SQL-PaLM: Improved Large Language Model Adaptation for Text-to-SQL
Satya Gundabathula
Hanjun Dai
Hootan Nakhost
TMLR (2024)
Preview abstract
Text-to-SQL, the process of translating natural language into Structured Query Language
(SQL), represents a transformative application of large language models (LLMs), potentially
revolutionizing how humans interact with data. This paper introduces the SQL-PaLM
framework, a comprehensive solution for understanding and enhancing Text-to-SQL using
LLMs, using in the learning regimes of few-shot prompting and instruction fine-tuning. With
few-shot prompting, we explore the effectiveness of consistency decoding with execution-based error filtering. With instruction fine-tuning, we delve deep in understanding the critical
paradigms that influence the performance of tuned LLMs. In particular, we investigate
how performance can be improved through expanded training data coverage and diversity,
synthetic data augmentation, and integrating query-specific database content. We propose
a test-time selection method to further refine accuracy by integrating SQL outputs from
multiple paradigms with execution feedback as guidance. Additionally, we tackle the
practical challenge of navigating intricate databases with a significant number of tables and
columns, proposing efficient techniques for accurately selecting relevant database elements to
enhance Text-to-SQL performance. Our holistic approach yields substantial advancements
in Text-to-SQL, as demonstrated on two key public benchmarks, Spider and BIRD. Through
comprehensive ablations and error analyses, we shed light on the strengths and weaknesses
of our framework, offering valuable insights into Text-to-SQL’s future work.
View details
Preview abstract
Grounded generation aims to equip language models (LMs) with the ability to produce more credible and accountable responses by accurately citing verifiable sources. However, existing methods, by either feeding LMs with raw or preprocessed materials, remain prone to errors. To address this, we introduce CaLM, a novel verification framework. CaLM leverages the insight that a robust grounded response should be consistent with information derived solely from its cited sources. Our framework empowers smaller LMs, which rely less on parametric memory and excel at processing relevant information given a query, to validate the output of larger LMs. Larger LM responses that closely align with the smaller LMs' output, which relies exclusively on cited documents, are verified. Responses showing discrepancies are iteratively refined through a feedback loop. Experiments on three open-domain question-answering datasets demonstrate significant performance gains of 1.5% to 7% absolute average without any required model fine-tuning.
View details
Chain-of-Table: Evolves Tables in the LLM Reasoning Chain for Table Understanding
Zilong Wang
Hao Zhang
Chun-Liang Li
Jingbo Shang
ICLR (2024)
Preview abstract
Table-based reasoning with large language models (LLMs) is a promising direction to tackle many table understanding tasks, such as table-based question answering and fact verification. Compared with generic reasoning, table-based reasoning requires the extraction of underlying semantics from both free-form questions and semi-structured tabular data. Chain-of-Thought and its similar approaches incorporate the reasoning chain in the form of textual context, but it is still an open question how to effectively leverage tabular data in the reasoning chain. We propose the Chain-of-Table framework, where tabular data is explicitly used in the reasoning chain as a proxy for intermediate thoughts. Specifically, we guide LLMs using in-context learning to iteratively generate operations and update the table to represent a tabular reasoning chain. LLMs can therefore dynamically plan the next operation based on the results of the previous ones. This continuous evolution of the table forms a chain, showing the reasoning process for a given tabular problem. The chain carries structured information of the intermediate results, enabling more accurate and reliable predictions. Chain-of-Table achieves new state-of-the-art performance on WikiTQ, FeTaQA, and TabFact benchmarks across multiple LLM choices.
View details
Preview abstract
With development of Large Language Models (LLMs), collaboration between LLMs to solve complex tasks has attracted more and more attention. An important challenging task is reasoning from long text that cannot be input into LLMs. Thus far, limited research has explored how to solve long context tasks via pure multi-agent collaboration.
In this paper, we propose Chain-of-Agents (CoA), a novel framework that leverages the multi-agent collaboration via natural language to solve complex tasks. In CoA, the long text is split into chunks to be processed by agents repeatedly with appending the information from preceding agents. A manager model is finally employed to obtain the final answer utilizing the output of the last agent.
On wide range of datasets for long context question answering, summarization, and code completion and with many LLMs (including PaLM 2, Claude, and Gemini), we show that CoA framework outperforms strong baselines, including the commonly-used retrieval augmented generation (RAG) systems, by a large margin. For instance, text-bison obtains 13.30\% performance gain on NarrativeQA, and 10.22\% on MuSiQue dataset.
View details
Tool Documentation Enables Zero-Shot Tool-Usage with Large Language Models
Cheng-Yu Hsieh
Si-An Chen
Chun-Liang Li
Alexander Ratner
Ranjay Krishna
arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00675 (2023)
Preview abstract
Today, large language models (LLMs) are taught to use new tools by providing a few demonstrations of the tool's usage. Unfortunately, demonstrations are hard to acquire, and can result in undesirable biased usage if the wrong demonstration is chosen. Even in the rare scenario that demonstrations are readily available, there is no principled selection protocol to determine how many and which ones to provide. As tasks grow more complex, the selection search grows combinatorially and invariably becomes intractable. Our work provides an alternative to demonstrations: tool documentation. We advocate the use of tool documentation, descriptions for the individual tool usage, over demonstrations. We substantiate our claim through three main empirical findings on 6 tasks across both vision and language modalities. First, on existing benchmarks, zero-shot prompts with only tool documentation are sufficient for eliciting proper tool usage, achieving performance on par with few-shot prompts. Second, on a newly collected realistic tool-use dataset with hundreds of available tool APIs, we show that tool documentation is significantly more valuable than demonstrations, with zero-shot documentation significantly outperforming few-shot without documentation. Third, we highlight the benefits of tool documentations by tackling image generation and video tracking using just-released unseen state-of-the-art models as tools. Finally, we highlight the possibility of using tool documentation to automatically enable new applications: by using nothing more than the documentation of GroundingDino, Stable Diffusion, XMem, and SAM, LLMs can re-invent the functionalities of the just-released Grounded-SAM and Track Anything models.
View details
