Publications

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

people standing in front of a screen with images and a chipboard

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

Sort By
  • Title
  • Title, descending
  • Year
  • Year, descending
1 - 15 of 11553 publications
Preview abstract Recent reports have highlighted how mobile apps share user location data with third parties, risking user privacy and platform trust. Although location data is highly sensitive, when users grant apps location access, they may not know the full extent to which it is used. We study how requiring Android apps to show a reason for location access could impact developers, users, and the platform. We surveyed 323 Android app developers and found most supported such a requirement. The majority said it would have a positive impact on user privacy, trust for apps, and trust for Android, where impact on user trust for Android correlated most strongly with support. Many developers also said the intervention would increase the number of users granting location access. Yet their open-ended comments also revealed consistent concerns, such as apps providing dishonest reasons and platform verification. To study the impact on user behavior, we conducted a randomized controlled experiment with 2579 US Android users. We tested how users' decisions to grant location access were impacted by app type, whether reasons were included in the requests, and the content of the reasons, including monetization. We did not find the reasons impacted users' decisions; decisions were instead driven by app type and demographics. Yet we did find the reasons could have a positive impact on user perception for the platform when the reasons did not include using data for ads. Our findings provide insights into developers' willingness to implement privacy-enhancing changes, and expose limits to improving user privacy by simply adding information to user interfaces. View details
A 3D Scene Graphs Survey: Open Challenges and Future Directions
Dennis Rotondi
Francesco Argenziano
Sebastian Koch
Nathan Hughes
Martin Büchner
Johanna Wald
Lukas Schmid
Daniele Nardi
Abhinav Valada
Liam Paul
Luca Carlone
Kai Arras
Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems (ARCRAS), 10 (2027) (to appear)
Preview abstract 3D Scene Graphs (3DSGs) have emerged as a powerful representation for spatial AI by combining geometric grounding with semantic and relational abstractions of the environment. Their expressiveness has made them relevant to a broad range of problems in robotics and computer vision, including mapping, task and motion planning, scene understanding, and many others. However, the field remains fragmented: different communities adopt distinct formulations, construction pipelines, and evaluation protocols, making it difficult to compare methods, identify common assumptions, and assess remaining challenges for robust real- world deployment. This survey provides a unified and critical review of 3DSGs, with particular emphasis on open challenges and future directions. We first formalize 3DSGs under a common definition and analyze the principal modeling choices that characterize existing formulations, including node and edge attributes, hierarchical structure, dynamic scene representations, and affordance-aware extensions. We then review how 3DSGs are constructed from raw sensory observations, covering both learning-oriented and construction-oriented systems. Finally, we examine downstream applications and evaluation strategies, from intrinsic graph quality to task-level performance. To support the community, we also provide a dedicated website that organizes and extends the surveyed works. View details
Preview abstract One of the most exciting developments in the time series space over the last few years has been the advances in probabilistic forecasting capabilities, both in terms of modeling approaches and available tools. Yet adoption of probabilistic forecasting methods has been slow amongst the wider forecasting community, and data science teams and business stakeholders are missing out on the opportunities provided by more accurate characterization of the uncertainty, including their correlations. In this presentation, we will point out that most established point forecasting approaches can be easily augmented to produce distributional forecasts, making it very hard to distinguish between the two types of approaches in practice. The gravitation towards using a single number as a forecast due to its explainability and operability makes the concrete benefits and ROI of upgrading to probabilistic forecasting approaches ambiguous at best, thus contributing to the challenges with adopting the newer probabilistic models. We will then argue for a reframing of the probabilistic vs. point forecasting distinction, not in terms of modeling approaches and pipeline configurations, but as a fundamental first principles based distinction based on the available data and the use case requirements. Probabilistic forecasting should not be seen as an add-on to point forecasting, nor as an opportunity for an incremental improvement on uncertainty bounds. It should be clear that certain applications mandate probabilistic forecasting because point forecasting, no matter how accurate, will lead to wrong decision making. This distinction should be analogous to how the distinction between regression and classification use cases is defined, or the distinction between clustering and dimensionality reduction use cases is defined. We will also discuss possible criteria for this first principles based distinction between point forecasting use cases and probabilistic use cases, and argue for why such a reframing might be beneficial for practitioners and business users. This article aims to initiate a discussion on making probabilistic forecasting as a principle that is more accessible to practitioners and non-technical stakeholders; that it is not an improvement to point forecasts: it is a critical must-have for many (or most) business forecasting use cases. View details
Preview abstract We introduce AMS (Activation-based Model Scanner), a tool that detects modifications to safety training in language models by measuring the geometric structure of safety-relevant concepts in activation space. Safety training creates measurable separation between harmful and benign content classes; certain safety modifications collapse or rotate this structure, while others leave it intact. We validate AMS across 14 model configurations spanning 4 architecture families (Llama, Gemma, Qwen, Mistral) and four safety-modification categories (instruction-tuned, base, abliterated, uncensored fine-tunes). Leave-one-out cross-validation of thresholds achieves 71% accuracy (10/14); bootstrap 95% confidence intervals on σ point estimates have median width 3.4σ and a substantial fraction of cells cross the PASS threshold under resampling. We further measure behavioral compliance on 20 stratified JailbreakBench prompts per model and find that σ on the harmful-content concept predicts compliance with Pearson r=−0.546 ( p=0.043 ); the rank-order Spearman correlation is weaker ( ρ=−0.423 , p=0.13 ). The structural signal predicts behavior directionally but with meaningful noise. Mechanistic analysis identifies a four-class taxonomy of safety-training modifications distinguished by activation-space signature: 1) training removal collapses cluster separation (e.g., base models, Dolphin variants: 0.5– 1.4σ ); 2) weight-orthogonalization-style abliteration both collapses separation and rotates the refusal direction (Llama-3.1-abliterated: σ=3.33 , direction cos sim 0.30); 3) rotation-without-collapse abliteration preserves cluster separation while rotating the refusal direction (Gemma-2-9b-abliterated: σ=4.54 , direction cos sim 0.84); and 4) behavioral fine-tuning that preserves both magnitude and direction (DarkIdol-1.2-Uncensored: σ=5.45 , direction preserved, 97% behavioral compliance). 1) and 2) AMS’s Tier 1 σ -threshold detects classes; 3) Tier 2 direction-similarity verification detects class; and 4) Class is undetectable by activation-only probing and represents a documented failure mode of the approach. We discuss threshold calibration, limitations of single-run measurement, and the open problem of detecting behavioral-only safety modifications. View details
Preview abstract Serverless computing platforms commonly suffer from cold-start latency because of Cold-start problems dynamic invocation patterns, but with current warm pool management strategies face difficulty in effectively adjusting to changes in workload. We propose the Meta-Initialized Warm Pool Manager (MI-WPM), a new component which combines meta-learning and adaptive control to address the problem of cold start efficiently. The innovation is based on a meta predictor trained on diverse invocation scenarios, which offers a generalized Initialization for rapid fine-tuning based on detection of workload drift. Contrary to traditional schemes based upon static heuristics or expensive “retraining, MI-WPM adapts its warm pool sizes by combining “ meta-initialized predictions with lightweight statistical drift detection. The architecture uses a temporal fusion transformer for modeling invocation patterns, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for monitoring drift, and feedback-controlled controller for opti- mizing resource distribution. The experimental results show the reduction in the Cold Start problem using MI-WPM. occurring by 47% compared to state-of-the-art approaches while keeping provisioning costs below 5%. Moreover, the Meta learning frame- work supports sub-minute adaptation on unknown invocation patterns, filling a gap in serverless computing. The proposed approach is developed as a modular extension of the existing serverless architectures without any infrastructure modifications. This work fills the gap between offline-trained models and reactive scaling, providing a principled approach to cold start mitigation in production environments. View details
Preview abstract Quantization methods have significantly improved the compute and memory efficiency of Large Language Model (LLM) training. However, existing approaches still rely on accumulating their updates into high precision: concretely, gradient updates must be applied to a high-precision weight buffer, known as \textit{master weights}. This buffer introduces substantial memory overhead, particularly for Sparse Mixture of Experts (SMoE) models, where model parameters and optimizer states dominate memory usage. In this work, we introduce the Error-Compensating Optimizer (ECO), which \textit{for the first time} enables the complete elimination of master weights by directly accumulating updates into quantized parameters, by leveraging existing optimizer states. ECO quantizes the weights after every gradient step and injects the resulting quantization error into the optimizer's momentum buffer, creating an error-feedback loop with zero additional memory overhead for quantization. Beyond its practical efficiency, ECO comes with theoretical guarantees. Specifically, under standard assumptions, naive master weight removal can lead to unbounded drift from the ideal parameter trajectory, whereas ECO provably bounds this drift, ensuring stable convergence. We validate ECO across a range of models, including small transformers (30M--800M), Gemma-3 1B, and an SMoE 2.1B model, using FP8 quantization. In all cases, ECO achieves near-lossless accuracy compared to high-precision baselines. For large SMoE models, ECO reduces memory usage by up to 25\%, establishing a new Pareto frontier for the trade-off between static memory and training loss. View details
Multi-Agent Design: Optimizing Agents with Better Prompts and Topologies
Han Zhou
Shariq Iqbal
Ivan Vulić
Anna Korhonen
International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2026)
Preview abstract Large language models (LLMs), employed as multiple agents that interact and collaborate with each other, have excelled at solving complex tasks. The agents are programmed with {prompts} that declare their functionality, along with the {workflows} that orchestrate interactions within a structured flow. Designing prompts and workflows for multi-agent systems is inherently complex, especially when addressing a new task. It often demands expert-level knowledge and involves significant trial and error. Gaining a deep understanding of the factors that contribute to effective multi-agent systems is essential for automating the entire process. Motivated by this, we first conduct an in-depth analysis of the design spaces for multi-agent systems, focusing on the impact of prompts, scaling the number of agents, and common types of agentic modules. Our findings reveal that top-performing systems often emerge from simpler design spaces, where prompts play a critical role in enhancing agent functionality and enabling more effective scaling. Based on the insights, we propose Multi-Agent System Search (MASS), a multi-stage optimization framework that performs the optimization in a pruned design space, with prompts and an influential subset of modules. We show that MASS-optimized multi-agent systems outperform existing alterntives by a substantial margin. Based on the MASS-found systems, we finally propose design principles behind building effective multi-agent systems. View details
Preview abstract This defensive publication describes a framework for multi-artificial intelligence (AI) orchestration that can be used to address potential limitations associated with reliance on single AI models, such as correlated systemic failures or cognitive blind spots. The described system is a cognitive orchestration framework that can function as a middleware layer to manage tasks across a heterogeneous ensemble of AI models. An orchestrator node can decompose a user request into a sequence of sub-tasks, which an arbitrage engine may then dynamically assign to suitable AI models based on certain factors, such as capability, cost, and latency. For certain tasks, such as those designated as high-risk, a byzantine consensus layer can route the task to multiple diverse models in parallel and may trigger a process, for example a 'cognitive debate,' which could be adjudicated by a third-party judge model to help resolve conflicting outputs. This framework can facilitate a more resilient system that may improve the accuracy and reliability of outputs when compared to some single-model architectures. View details
Preview abstract This article delves into how Google Site Reliability Engineers (SREs) leverage Gemini 3 and the Gemini CLI to aggressively reduce Mean Time to Mitigation (MTTM) during real-world outages. By focusing on the SRE motto of "Eliminate Toil," the article walks through a simulated incident, demonstrating how an agentic CLI acts as a human-in-the-loop copilot across the entire incident lifecycle: from initial paging and investigation, through safe, tool-driven mitigation and root cause analysis, to automated postmortem generation and action item filing. This direct integration of Gemini's reasoning capabilities with operational data and internal tools creates a virtuous cycle where past incident learnings continuously inform and improve future solutions. View details
GenAI on Google Cloud: Enterprise Generative AI Systems and AI Agents
Ayo Adedeji
Lavi Nigam
Stephanie Gervasi
O'Reilly Media, Inc. (2026)
Preview abstract In today's AI landscape, success depends not just on prompting large language models but on orchestrating them into intelligent systems that are scalable, compliant, and cost-effective. GenAI on Google Cloud is your hands-on guide to bridging that gap. Whether you're an ML engineer or an enterprise leader, this book offers a practical game plan for taking agentic systems from prototype to production. Written by practitioners with deep experience in AgentOps, data engineering, and GenAI infrastructure, this guide takes you through real-world workflows from data prep and deployment to orchestration and integration. With concrete examples, field-tested frameworks, and honest insights, you'll learn how to build agentic systems that deliver measurable business value. > Bridge the production gap that stalls 90% of vertical AI initiatives using systematic deployment frameworks > Navigate AgentOps complexities through practical guidance on orchestration, evaluation, and responsible AI practices > Build robust multimodal systems for text, images, and video using proven agent architectures > Optimize for scale with strategies for cost management, performance tuning, and production monitoring View details
Inhibitory normalization of error signals improves learning in neural circuits
Roy Henha Eyono
Jonathan Cornford
Arna Ghosh
Daniel Levenstein
Neural Computation (2026)
Preview abstract Normalization is a critical operation in neural circuits. In the brain, there is evidence that normalization is implemented via inhibitory interneurons and allows neural populations to adjust to changes in the distribution of their inputs. In artificial neural networks (ANNs), normalization is used to improve learning in tasks that involve complex input distributions. However, it is unclear whether inhibition-mediated normalization in biological neural circuits also improves learning. Here, we explore this possibility using ANNs with separate excitatory and inhibitory populations trained on an image recognition task with variable luminosity. We find that inhibition-mediated normalization does not improve learning if normalization is applied only during inference. However, when this normalization is extended to include back-propagated errors, performance improves significantly. These results suggest that if inhibition-mediated normalization improves learning in the brain, it acts primarily on learning signals rather than solely on sensory inputs. View details
Visual Planning: Let’s Think Only with Images
Han Zhou
Caiqi Zhang
Anna Korhonen
Chengzu Li
Yi Xu
Ivan Vulic
International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2026)
Preview abstract Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and their multimodal extensions (MLLMs) have significantly enhanced machine reasoning across diverse tasks. However, these models predominantly rely on language as the medium for both expressing and structuring reasoning, even when visual information is present. In this work, we argue that language may not always be the most natural or effective modality for reasoning, particularly in tasks involving spatial, geometric, or physical dynamics. Motivated by this, we propose a new paradigm, Visual Planning, which enables planning through purely visual representations, independent of textual mediation. In this paradigm, planning is executed via sequences of images that encode step-by-step inference in the visual domain, akin to how humans sketch or visualize future actions. We then introduce a novel two-stage reinforcement learning framework empowered by GRPO for post-training large vision models, resulting in substantial improvements in planning accuracy and generalization across both seen and novel scenarios, validated in representative visual navigation tasks, FrozenLake and Maze. Our results establish Visual Planning as a viable and promising alternative to language-based reasoning, opening new avenues for tasks that benefit from intuitive, image-based inference. View details
From Correctness to Collaboration: A Human-Centered Taxonomy of AI Agent Behavior in Software Engineering
Extended Abstracts of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’26), ACM, New York, NY, USA (2026)
Preview abstract The ongoing transition of Large Language Models in software engineering from code generators into autonomous agents requires a shift in how we define and measure success. While models are becoming more capable, the industry lacks a clear understanding of the behavioral norms that make an agent effective in collaborative software development in the enterprise. This work addresses this gap by presenting a taxonomy of desirable agent behaviors, synthesized from 91 sets of user-defined rules for coding agents. We identify four core expectations: Adhere to Standards and Processes, Ensure Code Quality and Reliability, Solve Problems Effectively, and Collaborate with the User. These findings offer a concrete vocabulary for agent behavior, enabling researchers to move beyond correctness-only benchmarks and design evaluations that reflect the realities of professional software development in large enterprises. View details
Preview abstract Large language models (LLMs) are trained on web-scale corpora that exhibit steep power-law distributions, in which the distribution of knowledge is highly long-tailed, with most appearing infrequently. While scaling has improved average-case performance, persistent failures on low-frequency, domain-specific, cultural, and temporal knowledge remain poorly characterized. This paper develops a structured taxonomy and analysis of long-tail knowledge in large language models, synthesizing prior work across technical and sociotechnical perspectives. We organize the literature along four complementary axes: how long-tail knowledge is defined, the mechanisms by which it is lost or distorted during training and inference, the technical interventions proposed to mitigate these failures, and the implications of these failures for fairness, accountability, transparency, and user trust. We further examine how existing evaluation practices obscure tail behavior and complicate accountability for rare but consequential failures. The paper concludes by identifying open challenges related to privacy, sustainability, and governance that constrain long-tail knowledge representation. Taken together, this paper provides a unifying conceptual framework for understanding how long-tail knowledge is defined, lost, evaluated, and manifested in deployed language model systems. View details
Preview abstract Using generative artificial intelligence with sensitive data may present challenges, as transmitting personally identifiable information or protected health information to third-party providers can introduce security risks, and some data masking techniques can reduce reasoning capabilities. A described system uses a proxy, masking layer that can intercept data within an enterprise's secure perimeter. This layer can substitute sensitive strings with persistent, structured semantic tokens that may be enriched with non-sensitive metadata hints to help preserve context. An external artificial intelligence can perform reasoning on this abstracted data, and its tokenized response can be re-hydrated into readable text on a client device (e.g., a smartphone, computer, or wearable device). This approach may allow third-party models to reason on proprietary information without direct access to the underlying plaintext data, which can assist organizations in managing data sovereignty while maintaining functional utility. View details
×