You are provided with a list of converations between a "USER" and "ASSISTANT". Figure out if the conversation provided as "classify_text" is authored by "USER" or "ASSISTANT". There are maximum of 7 conversations between "USER" and "ASSISTANT" in each input

Let me give you an example: ASSISTANT: generally speaking what type of movies do you watch , USER: I like thrillers a lot. , ASSISTANT: thrillers? for example? , USER: Zodiac's one of my favorite movies. , USER: Zodiac the movie about a serial killer from the '60s or '70s, around there. , ASSISTANT: Zodiac? oh wow ok, what do you like about that movie, classify_text: And I just think serial killers, in general, are interesting, so the movie was really good. And it was just neat to see that world. Like it went really in-depth. It was like almost 3 hours long, so you got to really feel like you were a part of that world and time period. And see what the detectives and the police did and the investigators.
The answer to this example can be: USER
Here is why: Based on last conversation in which the ASSISTANT ask's a question for which it waits for a reply from the "USER". We can classify this conversation as "USER" as it needs to respond for the given question.

OK. solve this:
ASSISTANT: What types of movies do you dislike or not enjoy at all? , ASSISTANT: Why don't you enjoy these types of movies? , ASSISTANT: Is there a specific title from this category that you dislike heavily? , USER: Sure. Out for Justice is terrible. , ASSISTANT: What did you like or dislike about this film? , USER: Good God. So, the acting is abysmal. The story line is both simple and bad at the same time. They have Steven Seagal doing entirely too much on his own. They have supporting cast that basically is as bad actor as Steven Seagal is maybe to not make him stand out too much, classify_text: When you can get to a fight scene, they're okay. But it's It's just a lot to go through. It's dark. It's It's just not bad It's amazing to me he's had such a successful career.
Answer:
USER