Google Research

Improving ML Training Data with Gold-Standard Quality Metrics

  • Leslie Barrett
  • Michael W. Sherman
KDD '19: 25th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Workshop on Data Collection, Curation, and Labeling (DCCL) for Mining and Learning, August 05, 2019, Anchorage, AK. (to appear)

Abstract

Hand-tagged training data is essential to many machine learning tasks. However, training data quality control has received little attention in the literature, despite data quality varying considerably with the tagging exercise. We propose methods to evaluate and enhance the quality of hand-tagged training data using statistical approaches to measure tagging consistency and agreement. We show that agreement metrics give more reliable results if recorded over multiple iterations of tagging, where declining variance in such recordings is an indicator of increasing data quality. We also show one way a tagging project can collect high-quality training data without requiring multiple tags for every work item, and that a tagger burn-in period may not be sufficient for minimizing tagger errors.

Learn more about how we do research

We maintain a portfolio of research projects, providing individuals and teams the freedom to emphasize specific types of work