Abstract
Parameterized Inapproximability Hypothesis (PIH) is a central question in the field of parameterized complexity. PIH asserts that given as input a 2-CSP on k variables and alphabet size n, it is W[1]-hard parameterized by k to distinguish if the input is perfectly satisfiable or if every assignment to the input violates 1% of the constraints.
An important implication of PIH is that it yields the tight parameterized inapproximability of the the k-maxcoverage problem. In the k-maxcoverage problem, we are given as input a set system, a threshold τ > 0, and a parameter k and the goal is to determine if there exist k sets in the input whose union is at least τ fraction of the entire universe. PIH implies that it is W[1]-hard parameterized by k to distinguish if there are k input sets whose union is at least τ fraction of the universe or if the union of every k input sets is not much larger than τ · (1 − 1/e) fraction of the universe.
In this work we present a gap preserving FPT reduction from the k-maxcoverage problem to the aforementioned 2-CSP problem, thus showing that the assertion that approximating k-maxcoverage to some constant factor implies PIH. In addition, we present a gap preserving FPT reduction from the k-median problem (in general metrics) to the k-maxcoverage problem, further highlighting the power of gap preserving FPT reductions over classical gap preserving polynomial time reductions.