Claim-Gated Source-Risk Auditing for Generative Search

Generative search can cite a passage accurately
while omitting a material relationship that changes how the
passage should be interpreted. This paper introduces an original
methodological framework and implementation blueprint for
auditing that gap; it is not an AI detector, classifier, or empirical
performance study. The framework combines a five-dimensional
query–source–answer record, an operational source-role taxonomy,
a derived omission endpoint, and explicit rules for uncertainty
and human review. Its central contribution is a claim-gated
evaluation protocol specifying the sampling, evidence capture,
blinded annotation, adjudication, agreement, accuracy, calibration,
error analysis, and paired intervention tests required before
detector, prevalence, or defense-effect claims are admissible. A
1,000-row synthetic workbook serves only as a specification fixture
for testing serialization and machine-checkable invariants. Its
score vectors are normalized within 5 × 10−4
and its recorded
labels match their vector argmax, but it lacks the provenance and
independent labels required for semantic validation. We therefore
make no claim about Web prevalence, detector accuracy, or
deployment benefit. The result is an implementation-oriented
audit methodology with falsifiable evidence gates for future realWeb evaluation.

• Machine intelligence