Publications

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

people standing in front of a screen with images and a chipboard

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

Sort By
  • Title
  • Title, descending
  • Year
  • Year, descending
1 - 15 of 11417 publications
SAC133 - SSAC Comments on Proposed Root KSK Algorithm Rollover
Wes Hardaker
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) Reports and Advisories (2026), pp. 9
Preview abstract The SSAC supports the transition from RSA with SHA-256 (Algorithm 8) to ECDSA P-256 with SHA-256 (Algorithm 13) as the cryptographic algorithm for the RootKSK. The root zone has relied on RSA-based algorithms since DNSSEC signing began in 2010. The algorithm did not change during the first KSK rollover in 2018 or during the second rollover currently underway and scheduled to complete in October 2026. Establishing a clear and predictable process for algorithm transitions is essential to the long-term security of the root zone, and the SSAC observes that the proposal addresses the Recommendation 23 of the SSR2 Review accordingly. The SSAC notes that the proposal builds upon the Root Zone DNSSEC Algorithm Rollover Study published by ICANN in May 2024, which assessed resolver and authoritative server support for alternative algorithms, analyzed rollover methodologies, and evaluated operational risks. The SSAC finds that the proposal implements the study’s recommendations. The SSAC also notes that this proposal is consistent with the SSAC’s prior work on DNSSEC key rollover, including SAC063, SAC073, SAC102, and SAC108. The SSAC encourages ICANN to proceed with this rollover. Specific comments on the proposal’s methodology, timeline, and operational readiness follow View details
Preview abstract In modern Kubernetes environments, eBPF (Extended Berkeley Packet Filter) has become the de facto standard for high-performance dataplane enforcement. However, this architecture introduces a complex distributed state problem: the asynchronous synchronization between the Kubernetes control plane (Intent) and the kernel-space BPF maps (Reality). A critical failure mode, termed “Silent Divergence,” occurs when the control plane believes a network policy or identity is applied, but the underlying kernel state is missing or corrupted. In this “Gray Failure” state, standard observability tools—including logs, liveness probes, and agent status checks—report health, while the network silently drops traffic. This paper introduces eBPF-Auditor, a specialized consistency verification framework. Unlike standard agents that rely on event-based reconciliation, eBPF-Auditor performs a periodic “Two-Way State Audit” that mathematically verifies the intersection of Kubernetes Intent and BPF Reality. We demonstrate through fault injection and benchmarks on 5,000 pods that this approach successfully detects state drift with 100% accuracy and negligible sub-millisecond overhead (ms), making it a viable solution for high-frequency runtime verification in production hyperscale clusters. View details
Preview abstract We study contextual bandits in the stochastic i.i.d.\ setting, where a learner observes contexts drawn from an unknown distribution, selects actions from a finite set $\cA$, and aims to identify an approximately optimal policy from a given class based on bandit feedback. Motivated by the important special case of bandit multiclass classification with zero-one rewards, we focus on the \emph{$s$-sparse} setting in which, for every context, the underlying reward vector has $L_1$-norm at most $s \ll |\cA|$. Our main result is the design of algorithms that, with probability at least~$1-\delta$, output an $\eps$-optimal policy compared to policy class $\Pi$ using \begin{align*} \wt{O} \brk*{\brk*{\frac{s}{\eps^2} + \frac{|\cA|}{\eps}} \log \frac{|\Pi|}{\delta}} \end{align*} samples. We further extend this bound to general Natarajan classes and complement it with a matching lower bound (up to logarithmic factors), thereby closing a substantial gap left by prior work~\citep{erez2024real,erez2024fast,erez2025bandit}, which incurred an additional $\Theta(|\cA|^9)$ dependence. We obtain these results via two complementary approaches. First, we analyze contextual bandits through the lens of contextual decision making with structured observations, designing an exploration-by-optimization algorithm whose sample complexity is governed by the \emph{decision-estimation coefficient} (DEC; \citealp{foster2021statistical,foster2022complexity}). We show that, with $s$-sparse rewards, the induced model class admits a sharp DEC bound that scales with $s$ and directly yields the optimal rate. Since this approach is largely information-theoretic and involves solving complex min-max optimization problems, we also develop a second, more specialized algorithmic method based on a low-variance exploration technique. This approach leads to concrete, tractable algorithms and naturally extends to contextual combinatorial semi-bandits, leading to improved sample complexity guarantees for bandit multiclass list classification. View details
Preview abstract Post-link optimizers (PLOs) such as Propeller and BOLT have demonstrated that precise, profile-guided code layout can extract significant performance gains from heavily optimized binaries. However, these systems are currently restricted to intra-procedural techniques, leaving the global potential of inter-procedural layout largely untapped. Inter-procedural code layout is historically difficult due to a combinatorially intractable search space and complex call-return semantics that are challenging to model. Consequently, the performance potential of fine-grained inter-procedural layout remains unproven in practice.Ours uses AlphaEvolve, an agentic workflow to evolve the compiler heuristic in Propeller into a fine-grained inter-procedural optimizer. While AlphaEvolve synthesizes novel code layout policies, Vizier fine-tunes the resulting policy hyperparameters. To ensure high-fidelity, we move away from approximate static cost models and the agentic workflow generates multiple layout variants that are executed on actual hardware to measure real performance counters, providing a precise reward signal for the evolutionary loop. Ours has been evaluated on several benchmarks including large warehouse-scale applications and experiments show performance improvements of 0.23% to 1.6% on these benchmarks optimized with state-of-the-art FDO and PLO. This is the first time ever that real-world applications have been optimized with fine-grained inter-procedural code layout. View details
Platform Competition in the Autobidding World
Ariel Schvartzman
Andres Perlroth
Mingfei Zhao
Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2026, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 87–98
Preview abstract We study the problem of auction design for advertising platforms that face strategic advertisers who are bidding across platforms. Each advertiser's goal is to maximize their total value or conversions while satisfying some constraint(s) across all the platforms they participates in. In this paper, we focus on advertisers with return-over-investment (henceforth, ROI) constraints, i.e. each advertiser is trying to maximize value while making sure that their ROI across all platforms is no less than some target value. An advertiser interacts with the platforms through autobidders -- for each platform, the advertiser strategically chooses a target ROI to report to the platform's autobidder, which in turn uses a uniform bid multiplier to bid on the advertiser's behalf on the queries owned by the given platform. Our main result is an auction comparator theorem that can be used to choose between different auction mechanisms by a revenue-maximizing platform operating in a competitive environment. Analogous to the Linkage Principle for interdependent values, our comparator demonstrates that, for a broad class of advertiser valuations, second-price auctions may sometimes generate higher revenue than first-price auctions. This contrasts sharply with the single-platform setting, where first-price auctions are optimal for both revenue and welfare. Our findings highlight the critical importance of considering inter-platform competition when designing optimal auctions. View details
Preview abstract How many T gates are needed to approximate an arbitrary n-qubit quantum state to within a given precision ϵ? Improving prior work of Low, Kliuchnikov and Schaeffer, we show that the optimal asymptotic scaling is Θ(sqrt{2^n log(1/ε)} + log(1/ε)) if we allow an unlimited number of ancilla qubits. We also show that this is the optimal T-count for implementing an arbitrary diagonal n-qubit unitary to within error ϵ. We describe an application to batched synthesis of single-qubit unitaries: we can approximate a tensor product of m = O(log log(1/ϵ)) arbitrary single-qubit unitaries to within error ϵ with the same asymptotic T-count as is required to approximate just one single-qubit unitary. View details
Mind the Gap: Structure-Aware Consistency in Preference Learning
Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2026)
Preview abstract Aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human intent, whether through explicit reward modeling or direct methods such as DPO, fundamentally relies on minimizing a surrogate loss as a proxy for the true pairwise ranking objective. We prove that this reliance is flawed for the standard surrogate losses used: for the equicontinuous hypothesis sets characteristic of neural networks, no standard surrogate provides a meaningful consistency guarantee. Minimizing the surrogate loss to zero can leave the true ranking error arbitrarily high. To resolve this, we formulate LLM alignment within a margin-shifted ranking framework and derive $H$-consistency bounds showing that enforcing a confidence margin $\gamma$ is not merely beneficial but necessary for consistency. We further introduce Structure-Aware $H$-consistency and a corresponding objective (SA-DPO) that adapts the margin to the semantic distance between responses, preventing instability on near-synonymous pairs. Finally, we analyze the trade-off between the margin required for consistency and the model's finite capacity to satisfy it, revealing a strict hierarchy of surrogate losses: heavy-tailed surrogates (e.g., the Polynomial Hinge family) offer strictly superior consistency guarantees for capacity-bounded models compared to the logistic loss used in DPO. Experiments on UltraFeedback and Argilla DPO-Mix-7k confirm that SA-DPO consistently outperforms DPO and SimPO, with a 58.5% head-to-head win-rate in downstream generation quality. View details
A Framework for Interactive Machine Learning and Enhanced Conversational Systems
Jerry Young
Richard Abisla
Sanjay Batra
Mikki Phan
Nature, Springer-Verlag (2026)
Preview abstract Conversational systems are increasingly prevalent, yet current versions often fail to support the full range of human speech, including variations in speed, rhythm, syntax, grammar, articulation, and resonance. This reduces their utility for individuals with dysarthria, apraxia, dysphonia, and other language and speech-related disabilities. Building on research that emphasizes the need for specialized datasets and model training tools, our study uses a scaffolded approach to understand the ideal model training and voice recording process. Our findings highlight two distinct user flows for improving model training and provide six guidelines for future conversational system-related co-design frameworks. This study offers important insights on creating more effective conversational systems by emphasizing the need to integrate interactive machine learning into training strategies. View details
Preview abstract **Agentic Engineering** is the rigorous discipline of treating Large Language Models as semi-autonomous systems that execute complex, multi-step workflows (trajectories) based on verifiable specifications, rather than using them as simple autocomplete engines. Here is a brief summary of its core principles: * **Main Goals:** It aims to maximize the agent's autonomous run-time, multiply a single engineer's impact by running parallel tasks, and offload tedious boilerplate coding. * **The "Harness":** A raw model is virtually useless without heavy investment in a harness—comprising tools, system prompts, and strict guardrails—to reliably guide the model and enforce coding policies. * **Loss of Micro-Control:** Engineers must surrender idiosyncratic stylistic preferences; if the agent's code passes automated linters and tests, it is accepted. * **Meta-Debugging:** When failures occur, engineers no longer fix code syntax. Instead, they debug the workflow itself—adjusting the agent's tools, search queries, or prompt constraints to ensure repeatable success. View details
Preview abstract We introduce ALPS (Activation-based Length Prediction for Scheduling), a method for predicting LLM generation length from prefill activations before any tokens are generated. Unlike existing approaches that require model fine-tuning or complex entropy-weighted pooling, ALPS uses a simple linear probe on the last-token activation at intermediate layers. We discover that generation length is encoded in prefill representations: a ridge regression probe achieves R-squared > 0.85 across three model families. Validation across Llama-3.1-8B, Gemma-2-9B, and Qwen-2.5-7B demonstrates: (1) intermediate layers generally perform well, with some architectural variation; (2) simple last-token extraction outperforms complex pooling strategies; (3) activations improve substantially over surface-feature baselines (24 percentage points over input length plus lexical features). The best models achieve R-squared = 0.943 (Gemma), R-squared = 0.880 (Llama), and R-squared = 0.857 (Qwen) with MAE of 38-80 tokens. All test prompts terminated naturally (100% EOS), eliminating truncation confounds. While our evaluation uses 200 curated prompts—sufficient for demonstrating the phenomenon but requiring broader validation—cross-validation confirms generalization beyond training data. ALPS enables practical applications including budget-constrained inference, request scheduling, and resource allocation. The probe adds negligible overhead (~16KB direction vector, single dot product), making ALPS practical for production deployment. View details
Learning from Equivalence Queries, Revisited
Mark Braverman
Roi Livni
Shay Moran
Kobbi Nissim
COLT (2026)
Preview abstract Modern machine learning systems, such as generative models and recommendation systems, often evolve through a cycle of deploying a model, observing user interactions, and updating the model intermittently based on feedback. This mode of learning contrasts with common supervised learning frameworks, which focus on loss or regret minimization over a shared sequence of prediction tasks. Motivated by this deployment-driven learning cycle, we revisit the classical model of learning from equivalence queries, introduced by Angluin, which provides a simple abstraction of such interactions: a learner repeatedly proposes hypotheses and, whenever the deployed hypothesis is inadequate, receives a counterexample tailored to that hypothesis. Under fully adversarial counterexample generation, however, this model exhibits overly pessimistic worst-case behavior. Moreover, most existing work on learning from equivalence queries considers the \emph{full-information} setting, where the learner observes not only a counterexample but also its correct label. This is an assumption that does not always align with natural interactive settings. To address these considerations, we restrict the environment to generate counterexamples in a less adversarial manner by introducing a broad class of counterexample generators, which we call \emph{symmetric}. Informally, such symmetric counterexample generators select counterexamples based only on the symmetric difference between the hypothesis and the target, and encompass natural feedback mechanisms such as random counterexamples, as well as generators that select counterexamples minimizing a prescribed complexity measure over the instance space. Within this framework, we study learning from equivalence queries under both full-information and bandit feedback. We establish tight bounds on the number of learning rounds in both settings and outline directions for future research. Our techniques rely on a game-theoretic perspective on symmetric adversaries and combine adaptive weighting algorithms with minimax arguments. View details
Preview abstract While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in diagnostic dialogue, their capabilities for effective management reasoning - including disease progression, therapeutic response, and safe medication prescription - remain under-explored. We advance the previously demonstrated diagnostic capabilities of the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE) through a new LLM-based agentic system optimised for clinical management and dialogue, incorporating reasoning over the evolution of disease and multiple patient visit encounters, response to therapy, and professional competence in medication prescription. To ground its reasoning in authoritative clinical knowledge, AMIE leverages Gemini's long-context capabilities, combining in-context retrieval with structured reasoning to align its output with relevant and up-to-date clinical practice guidelines and drug formularies. In a randomized, blinded virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) study, AMIE was compared to 21 primary care physicians (PCPs) across 100 multi-visit case scenarios designed to reflect UK NICE Guidance and BMJ Best Practice guidelines. AMIE was non-inferior to PCPs in management reasoning as assessed by specialist physicians and scored better in both preciseness of treatments and investigations, and in its alignment with and grounding of management plans in clinical guidelines. To benchmark medication reasoning, we developed RxQA, a multiple-choice question benchmark derived from two national drug formularies (US, UK) and validated by board-certified pharmacists. While AMIE and PCPs both benefited from the ability to access external drug information, AMIE outperformed PCPs on higher difficulty questions. While further research would be needed before real-world translation, AMIE's strong performance across evaluations marks a significant step towards conversational AI as a tool in disease management. View details
ALF: Advertiser Large Foundation Model for Multi-Modal Advertiser Understanding
Sunny Rajagopalan
Alireza Golestaneh
Shubhra Chandra
Min Zhou
Jonathan Vronsky
Songbai Yan
2026
Preview abstract We present ALF (Advertiser Large Foundation model), a multi-modal transformer architecture for understanding advertiser behavior and intent across text, image, video and structured data modalities. Through contrastive learning and multi-task optimization, ALF creates unified advertiser representations that capture both content and behavioral patterns. Our model achieves state-of-the-art performance on critical tasks including fraud detection, policy violation identification, and advertiser similarity matching. In production deployment, ALF reduces false positives by 90\% while maintaining 99.8\% precision on abuse detection tasks. The architecture's effectiveness stems from its novel combination of multi-modal transformations, intersample attention mechanism, spectrally normalized projections, and calibrated probabilistic outputs. View details
Preview abstract Scaling test-time computation improves performance across different tasks on large language models (LLMs), yet mainstream scaling methods remain challenging for tool-augmented LLM agents. Sequential scaling tends to yield shallow tool use and under-exploration, whereas parallel scaling inflates cost through repeated tool calls. The dual costs of tokens and tool calls further complicate cost accounting and hinder fair comparison. In this work, we study the test-time scaling of widely used, tool-reliant search agents under resource constraints, analyzing performance with a unified cost metric that incorporates both tokens and tool calls. To this end, we propose Cost-effective Agent Test-Time Scaling (CATS), a budget-aware framework designed to support more cost-effective scaling by guiding resource allocation between sequential and parallel exploration. Experiments across search-intensive benchmarks show that CATS produces more favorable scaling curves, attaining higher accuracy with fewer tool calls and lower overall cost. Our work introduces a cost-conscious design for agent test-time scaling and contributes empirical insights that enable a more transparent and principled understanding of scaling in tool-augmented agents. View details
Preview abstract AI agents equipped with tool-calling capabilities are susceptible to \emph{Indirect Prompt Injection} (IPI) attacks. In this attack scenario, malicious commands hidden within \emph{untrusted} content trick the agent into performing unauthorized actions. Existing defenses can reduce attack success but often suffer from the \emph{over-defense dilemma}: they deploy expensive, \emph{always-on} sanitization that degrades utility and latency even in benign scenarios. We revisit IPI through an operational causal lens: a successful injection manifests as a \emph{grounding collapse} where the user request no longer provides decisive support for the agent's privileged action, while a particular untrusted segment provides disproportionate marginal support. Based on this signature, we propose \texttt{CausalArmor}, a selective defense framework that (i) computes lightweight, normalized leave-one-out attributions at privileged decision points, and (ii) triggers targeted sanitization only when an untrusted segment dominates the user intent. Additionally, CausalArmor employs \emph{retroactive Chain-of-Thought masking} to prevent the agent from acting on ``poisoned" reasoning traces. Experiments on AgentDojo and DoomArena demonstrate that CausalArmor matches the security of aggressive defenses with explainability while preserving utility and latency of AI agents. View details
×