Dale Webster
Dale Webster is Director in Google Research working to improve patient outcomes in healthcare using Deep Learning and Medical Imaging. His work Includes leveraging AI to screen for Diabetic Retinopathy in India and Thailand, predicting Cardiovascular health factors from fundus photos, differential diagnosis of skin disease, and applications of medically tuned LLMs. Prior to Google he was a Software Engineer at Pacific Biosciences working on direct sequencing of methylation state and rapid sequencing and assembly of microbial pathogens during global outbreaks. His PhD work in Bioinformatics at the University of California San Francisco focused on viral evolution, and he received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Rice University.
Research Areas
Authored Publications
Sort By
Towards conversational artificial intelligence for disease management
Khaled Saab
David Stutz
Yong Cheng
Kavita Kulkarni
Sara Mahdavi
Joelle Barral
James Manyika
Ryutaro Tanno
Adam Rodman
Nature (2026)
Preview abstract
Although large language models have shown promise in diagnostic dialogue, their capabilities for effective management reasoning, including disease progression, therapeutic response and safe medication prescription, have remained underexplored. We have advanced the previously demonstrated diagnostic capabilities of the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE) using a new large-language-model-based agentic system optimized for multivisit clinical management and dialogue. To ground the reasoning of AMIE in authoritative clinical knowledge, we leveraged the long-context capabilities of Gemini, combining in-context retrieval with structured reasoning to align its output with up-to-date clinical practice guidelines and drug formularies. In a randomized, blinded virtual Objective Structured Clinical Examination study, AMIE was compared to 21 primary care physicians (PCPs) across 100 multivisit case scenarios designed to reflect the guidance of the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and BMJ Best Practice guidelines. AMIE was non-inferior to PCPs in management reasoning, as assessed by specialists, and scored better both with respect to preciseness of treatment and investigation, and in terms of its alignment with and grounding in clinical guidelines. To benchmark medication reasoning, we developed RxQA, a multiple-choice question benchmark that was derived from two national drug formularies (from the USA and UK) and validated by board-certified pharmacists. Although AMIE and PCPs both benefited from the ability to access external drug information, AMIE outperformed PCPs on higher-difficulty questions. Although further research will be needed before real-world translation of AMIE, its strong performance across evaluations marks a significant step towards use of conversational artificial intelligence as a tool in disease management.
View details
Towards expert-level medical AI for real-time video consultations
Mahvish Nagda
Jihyeon Lee
Matthew Thompson
CJ Park
Tim Strother
Roma Ruparel
Teya Bergamaschi
Suhana Bedi
Meet Shah
Pavel Dubov
Toshiyuki Fukuzawa
Sam Schmidgall
Craig Schiff
Joseph Xu
Aliya Rysbek
Yana Lunts
Jan Freyberg
Rebecca Hemenway
David Racz
Carey Radebaugh
Joelle Barral
Kavi Goel
Kat Chou
James Manyika
Gregory Wayne
Yun Liu
Ethan Goh
Christina Chen
Ryutaro Tanno
arXiv (2026)
Preview abstract
Audio-visual interaction is the standard for patient-physician consultations, enabling natural communication and effective assessment of illness through non-verbal cues. While text-based AI has shown promise, it discards essential perceptual dimensions and limits patients who cannot articulate symptoms in writing. Early efforts to extend medical AI to audio-visual interaction have demonstrated feasibility, but not reached clinician-level performance. Here, we provide the first demonstration of expert-level AI in real-time clinical video consultations using AMIE (Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer) in a video configuration. AMIE (Video) is a Gemini-based multi-agent system integrating low-latency dialogue, clinical reasoning, and real-time audio-visual perception. To guide development, we established a taxonomy and automated evaluations for clinical audio-visual cues in telehealth settings. In a randomized Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) study with 30 primary care physicians (PCPs), 15 patient actors and 100 clinical scenarios, we compared AMIE (Video), its text-only counterpart AMIE (Text), and PCPs consulting via video. Clinical evaluators rated AMIE (Video) on par or better than PCPs in history-taking, diagnosis, management, and physical observation and examination. Patient actors preferred AMIE's approach to assessing and explaining conditions, while PCPs were preferred for rapport and partnership building. In modality ablation, patient actors preferred AMIE (Video)'s interface over text chat for communicative effectiveness, convenience, and feeling understood. Limitations remain in fine anatomical precision, subtle affective nuances, and high-frequency movements. While further research is needed before real-world translation, these results mark an important milestone toward AI systems capable of augmenting care across the sensory complexity of clinical practice.
View details
A large language model for complex cardiology care
Jack W O’Sullivan
Khaled Saab
Daniel K. Amponsah
Evaline Cheng
Yong Cheng
Emily Chu
Yaanik Desai
Aly Elezaby
Muhammad Fazal
Tasmeen Hussain
Sneha S. Jain
Daniel Seung Kim
Roy Lan
Jiwen Li
Wilson Tang
Natalie Tapaskar
Victoria Parikh
Ryan Sandoval
Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla
Bryan Wu
Kavita Kulkarni
Philip Mansfield
Juro Gottweis
Joelle Barral
Ryutaro Tanno
Sara Mahdavi
Euan Ashley
Nature Medicine (2026)
Preview abstract
The scarcity of subspecialist medical expertise poses a considerable challenge for healthcare delivery. This issue is particularly acute in cardiology, where timely, accurate management determines outcomes. We explored the potential of Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE), a large language model-based experimental medical artificial intelligence system, to augment clinical decision-making in this challenging context. We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing large language model-assisted care with the usual care of complex patients suspected of having a genetic cardiomyopathy, and we curated a real-world dataset of complex cases from a subspecialist cardiology practice. Nine participating general cardiologists were provided with access to both clinical text reports and raw diagnostic data—including electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging scans and cardiopulmonary exercise testing—and were randomized to manage these cases, either with or without assistance from AMIE. We developed a ten-domain evaluation rubric used by three blinded subspecialists to evaluate the quality of triage, diagnosis and management. In our randomized controlled trial with retrospective patient data, subspecialists favored large language model-assisted responses overall, and for the management plan and diagnostic testing domains, with the remaining domains considered a tie. Overall, subspecialists preferred AMIE-assisted cardiology assessments 46.7% of the time, compared with 32.7% for cardiologists alone (P = 0.02), with 20.6% rated as a tie. Subspecialists also quantified errors, extra and missing content, reasoning and potential bias. Cardiologists alone had more clinically significant errors (24.3% versus 13.1%, P = 0.033) and more missing content (37.4% versus 17.8%, P = 0.0021) than cardiologists assisted by AMIE. Lastly, cardiologists who used AMIE reported that AMIE helped their assessment more than half the time (57.0%) and saved time in 50.5% of cases.
View details
A prospective clinical feasibility study of a conversational diagnostic AI in an ambulatory primary care clinic
Peter Brodeur
Jacob M. Koshy
Khaled Saab
Ava Homiar
Roma Ruparel
Charles Wu
Ryutaro Tanno
Joseph Xu
Amy Wang
David Stutz
Hannah M. Ferrera
David Barrett
Lindsey Crowley
Jihyeon Lee
Spencer E. Rittner
Selena K. Zhang
Elahe Vedadi
Christine G. Kohn
Kavita Kulkarni
Vinay Kadiyala
Sara Mahdavi
Wendy Du
David Feinbloom
Renee Wong
Petar Sirkovic
Alessio Orlandi
Juro Gottweis
Joelle Barral
Kat Chou
James Manyika
Rob Fields
Jonathan X. Li
Marc L. Cohen
Adam Rodman
arXiv (2026)
Preview abstract
Large language model (LLM)-based AI systems have shown promise for patient-facing diagnostic and management conversations in simulated settings. Translating these systems into clinical practice requires assessment in real-world workflows with rigorous safety oversight. We report a prospective, single-arm feasibility study of an LLM-based conversational AI, the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE), conducting clinical history taking and presentation of potential diagnoses for patients to discuss with their provider at urgent care appointments at a leading academic medical center. 100 adult patients completed an AMIE text-chat interaction up to 5 days before their appointment. We sought to assess the conversational safety and quality, patient and clinician experience, and clinical reasoning capabilities compared to primary care providers (PCPs). Human safety supervisors monitored all patient-AMIE interactions in real time and did not need to intervene to stop any consultations based on pre-defined criteria. Patients reported high satisfaction and their attitudes towards AI improved after interacting with AMIE (p < 0.001). PCPs found AMIE's output useful with a positive impact on preparedness. AMIE's differential diagnosis (DDx) included the final diagnosis, per chart review 8 weeks post-encounter, in 90% of cases, with 75% top-3 accuracy. Blinded assessment of AMIE and PCP DDx and management (Mx) plans suggested similar overall DDx and Mx plan quality, without significant differences for DDx (p = 0.6) and appropriateness and safety of Mx (p = 0.1 and 1.0, respectively). PCPs outperformed AMIE in the practicality (p = 0.003) and cost effectiveness (p = 0.004) of Mx. While further research is needed, this study demonstrates the initial feasibility, safety, and user acceptance of conversational AI in a real-world setting, representing crucial steps towards clinical translation.
View details
Prospective evidence for conversational medical AI is hard, but non-negotiable
Adam Rodman
Ami Parekh
Ethan Goh
Christina Chen
Joelle Barral
Nature Medicine (2026)
Preview abstract
Trust in clinical artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be benchmarked into existence. It must be earned through rigorous prospective studies in real-world clinical settings, where the hardest lessons often concern the humans and systems around the AI, not the technology itself.
View details
Toward expert-level medical question answering with large language models
Karan Singhal
Juro Gottweis
Le Hou
Kevin Clark
Heather Cole-Lewis
Amy Wang
Sami Lachgar
Philip Mansfield
Sushant Prakash
Bradley Green
Ewa Dominowska
Nenad Tomašev
Renee Wong
Sara Mahdavi
Joelle Barral
Nature Medicine (2025)
Preview abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in medical question answering, with Med-PaLM being the first to exceed a ‘passing’ score in United States Medical Licensing Examination style questions. However, challenges remain in long-form medical question answering and handling real-world workflows. Here, we present Med-PaLM 2, which bridges these gaps with a combination of base LLM improvements, medical domain fine-tuning and new strategies for improving reasoning and grounding through ensemble refinement and chain of retrieval. Med-PaLM 2 scores up to 86.5% on the MedQA dataset, improving upon Med-PaLM by over 19%, and demonstrates dramatic performance increases across MedMCQA, PubMedQA and MMLU clinical topics datasets. Our detailed human evaluations framework shows that physicians prefer Med-PaLM 2 answers to those from other physicians on eight of nine clinical axes. Med-PaLM 2 also demonstrates significant improvements over its predecessor across all evaluation metrics, particularly on new adversarial datasets designed to probe LLM limitations (P < 0.001). In a pilot study using real-world medical questions, specialists preferred Med-PaLM 2 answers to generalist physician answers 65% of the time. While specialist answers were still preferred overall, both specialists and generalists rated Med-PaLM 2 to be as safe as physician answers, demonstrating its growing potential in real-world medical applications.
View details
Towards accurate differential diagnosis with large language models
Daniel McDuff
Amy Wang
Karan Singhal
Yash Sharma
Kavita Kulkarni
Le Hou
Yong Cheng
Sara Mahdavi
Sushant Prakash
Anupam Pathak
Shwetak Patel
Ewa Dominowska
Juro Gottweis
Joelle Barral
Kat Chou
Jake Sunshine
Nature (2025)
Preview abstract
A comprehensive differential diagnosis is a cornerstone of medical care that is often reached through an iterative process of interpretation that combines clinical history, physical examination, investigations and procedures. Interactive interfaces powered by large language models present new opportunities to assist and automate aspects of this process. Here we introduce the Articulate Medical Intelligence Explorer (AMIE), a large language model that is optimized for diagnostic reasoning, and evaluate its ability to generate a differential diagnosis alone or as an aid to clinicians. Twenty clinicians evaluated 302 challenging, real-world medical cases sourced from published case reports. Each case report was read by two clinicians, who were randomized to one of two assistive conditions: assistance from search engines and standard medical resources; or assistance from AMIE in addition to these tools. All clinicians provided a baseline, unassisted differential diagnosis prior to using the respective assistive tools. AMIE exhibited standalone performance that exceeded that of unassisted clinicians (top-10 accuracy 59.1% versus 33.6%, P = 0.04). Comparing the two assisted study arms, the differential diagnosis quality score was higher for clinicians assisted by AMIE (top-10 accuracy 51.7%) compared with clinicians without its assistance (36.1%; McNemar’s test: 45.7, P < 0.01) and clinicians with search (44.4%; McNemar’s test: 4.75, P = 0.03). Further, clinicians assisted by AMIE arrived at more comprehensive differential lists than those without assistance from AMIE. Our study suggests that AMIE has potential to improve clinicians’ diagnostic reasoning and accuracy in challenging cases, meriting further real-world evaluation for its ability to empower physicians and widen patients’ access to specialist-level expertise.
View details
Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Diabetic Retinopathy on Patients with Young-Onset Diabetes
Tony Tan-Torres
Pradeep Praveen
Divleen Jeji
Arthur Brant
Xiang Yin
Lu Yang
Tayyeba Ali
Ilana Traynis
Dushyantsinh Jadeja
Rajroshan Sawhney
Pradeep Venkatesh
Nikhil Tandon
Ophthalmology and Therapy (2025)
Preview abstract
Introduction
While many deep learning systems (DLSs) for diabetic retinopathy (DR) have been developed and validated on cohorts with an average age of 50s or older, fewer studies have examined younger individuals. This study aimed to understand DLS performance for younger individuals, who tend to display anatomic differences, such as prominent retinal sheen. This sheen can be mistaken for exudates or cotton wool spots, and potentially confound DLSs.
Methods
This was a prospective cross-sectional cohort study in a “Diabetes of young” clinic in India, enrolling 321 individuals between ages 18 and 45 (98.8% with type 1 diabetes). Participants had fundus photographs taken and the photos were adjudicated by experienced graders to obtain reference DR grades. We defined a younger cohort (age 18–25) and an older cohort (age 26–45) and examined differences in DLS performance between the two cohorts. The main outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity for DR.
Results
Eye-level sensitivity for moderate-or-worse DR was 97.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 91.2, 98.2] for the younger cohort and 94.0% [88.8, 98.1] for the older cohort (p = 0.418 for difference). The specificity for moderate-or-worse DR significantly differed between the younger and older cohorts, 97.9% [95.9, 99.3] and 92.1% [87.6, 96.0], respectively (p = 0.008). Similar trends were observed for diabetic macular edema (DME); sensitivity was 79.0% [57.9, 93.6] for the younger cohort and 77.5% [60.8, 90.6] for the older cohort (p = 0.893), whereas specificity was 97.0% [94.5, 99.0] and 92.0% [88.2, 95.5] (p = 0.018). Retinal sheen presence (94% of images) was associated with DME presence (p < 0.0001). Image review suggested that sheen presence confounded reference DME status, increasing noise in the labels and depressing measured sensitivity. The gradability rate for both DR and DME was near-perfect (99% for both).
Conclusion
DLS-based DR screening performed well in younger individuals aged 18–25, with comparable sensitivity and higher specificity compared to individuals aged 26–45. Sheen presence in this cohort made identification of DME difficult for graders and depressed measured DLS sensitivity; additional studies incorporating optical coherence tomography may improve accuracy of measuring DLS DME sensitivity.
View details
Closing the AI generalisation gap by adjusting for dermatology condition distribution differences across clinical settings
Rajeev Rikhye
Aaron Loh
Grace Hong
Margaret Ann Smith
Vijaytha Muralidharan
Doris Wong
Michelle Phung
Nicolas Betancourt
Bradley Fong
Rachna Sahasrabudhe
Khoban Nasim
Alec Eschholz
Basil Mustafa
Jan Freyberg
Terry Spitz
Kat Chou
Peggy Bui
Justin Ko
Steven Lin
The Lancet eBioMedicine (2025)
Preview abstract
Background: Generalisation of artificial intelligence (AI) models to a new setting is challenging. In this study, we seek to understand the robustness of a dermatology (AI) model and whether it generalises from telemedicine cases to a new setting including both patient-submitted photographs (“PAT”) and clinician-taken photographs in-clinic (“CLIN”).
Methods: A retrospective cohort study involving 2500 cases previously unseen by the AI model, including both PAT and CLIN cases, from 22 clinics in the San Francisco Bay Area, spanning November 2015 to January 2021. The primary outcome measure for the AI model and dermatologists was the top-3 accuracy, defined as whether their top 3 differential diagnoses contained the top reference diagnosis from a panel of dermatologists per case.
Findings: The AI performed similarly between PAT and CLIN images (74% top-3 accuracy in CLIN vs. 71% in PAT), however, dermatologists were more accurate in PAT images (79% in CLIN vs. 87% in PAT). We demonstrate that demographic factors were not associated with AI or dermatologist errors; instead several categories of conditions were associated with AI model errors (p < 0.05). Resampling CLIN and PAT to match skin condition distributions to the AI development dataset reduced the observed differences (AI: 84% CLIN vs. 79% PAT; dermatologists: 77% CLIN vs. 89% PAT). We demonstrate a series of steps to close the generalisation gap, requiring progressively more information about the new dataset, ranging from the condition distribution to additional training data for rarer conditions. When using additional training data and testing on the dataset without resampling to match AI development, we observed comparable performance from end-to-end AI model fine tuning (85% in CLIN vs. 83% in PAT) vs. fine tuning solely the classification layer on top of a frozen embedding model (86% in CLIN vs. 84% in PAT).
Interpretation: AI algorithms can be efficiently adapted to new settings without additional training data by recalibrating the existing model, or with targeted data acquisition for rarer conditions and retraining just the final layer.
View details
Generative AI for medical education: Insights from a case study with medical students and an AI tutor for clinical reasoning
Amy Wang
Roma Ruparel
Paul Jhun
Julie Anne Seguin
Patricia Strachan
Renee Wong
CHI (2025) (to appear)
Preview abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), have demonstrated significant potential in clinical reasoning skills such as history-taking and differential diagnosis generation—critical aspects of medical education. This work explores how LLMs can augment medical curricula through interactive learning. We conducted a participatory design process with medical students, residents and medical education experts to co-create an AI-powered tutor prototype for clinical reasoning. As part of the co-design process, we conducted a qualitative user study, investigating learning needs and practices via interviews, and conducting concept evaluations through interactions with the prototype. Findings highlight the challenges learners face in transitioning from theoretical knowledge to practical application, and how an AI tutor can provide personalized practice and feedback. We conclude with design considerations, emphasizing the importance of context-specific knowledge and emulating positive preceptor traits, to guide the development of AI tools for medical education.
View details
