Publications

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

people standing in front of a screen with images and a chipboard

Our teams aspire to make discoveries that impact everyone, and core to our approach is sharing our research and tools to fuel progress in the field.

Sort By
  • Title
  • Title, descending
  • Year
  • Year, descending
1 - 15 of 11267 publications
    Preview abstract In some multi-stage software build pipelines, downstream compiler errors may be reported against ephemeral, machine-generated intermediate artifacts rather than original, human-written source code, which can make remediation challenging. A system and method may address this by intercepting a downstream error, mapping its location back to the original source file, and programmatically injecting a dormant suppression tag into the original source code. During a subsequent build, an intermediate transpiler can propagate this tag into a newly generated intermediate artifact. In the intermediate file, the tag may become active and be recognized by the downstream compiler as a directive to suppress the specific error. This approach can facilitate an automated remediation process for certain build failures that avoids direct modification of ephemeral files and uses the original source code as a record for suppression. View details
    Preview abstract This whitepaper seeks to elucidate implications that the capabilities of developing quantum architectures have on blockchain vulnerabilities and mitigation strategies. First, we provide new resource estimates for breaking the 256-bit Elliptic Curve Discrete Logarithm Problem, the core of modern blockchain cryptography. We demonstrate that Shor's algorithm for this problem can execute with either <1200 logical qubits and <90 million Toffoli gates or <1450 logical qubits and <70 million Toffoli gates. In the interest of responsible disclosure, we use a zero-knowledge proof to validate these results without disclosing attack vectors. On superconducting architectures with 1e-3 physical error rates and planar connectivity, those circuits can execute in minutes using fewer than half a million physical qubits. We introduce a critical distinction between fast-clock (such as superconducting and photonic) and slow-clock (such as neutral atom and ion trap) architectures. Our analysis reveals that the first fast-clock CRQCs would enable on-spend attacks on public mempool transactions of some cryptocurrencies. We survey major cryptocurrency vulnerabilities through this lens, identifying systemic risks associated with advanced features in some blockchains such as smart contracts, Proof-of-Stake consensus, and Data Availability Sampling, as well as the enduring concern of abandoned assets. We argue that technical solutions would benefit from accompanying public policy and discuss various frameworks of digital salvage to regulate the recovery or destruction of dormant assets while preventing adversarial seizure. We also discuss implications for other digital assets and tokenization as well as challenges and successful examples of the ongoing transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC). Finally, we urge all vulnerable cryptocurrency communities to join the ongoing migration to PQC without delay. View details
    Preview abstract This article delves into how Google Site Reliability Engineers (SREs) leverage Gemini 3 and the Gemini CLI to aggressively reduce Mean Time to Mitigation (MTTM) during real-world outages. By focusing on the SRE motto of "Eliminate Toil," the article walks through a simulated incident, demonstrating how an agentic CLI acts as a human-in-the-loop copilot across the entire incident lifecycle: from initial paging and investigation, through safe, tool-driven mitigation and root cause analysis, to automated postmortem generation and action item filing. This direct integration of Gemini's reasoning capabilities with operational data and internal tools creates a virtuous cycle where past incident learnings continuously inform and improve future solutions. View details
    Who Controls the Curriculum for AI? The Limits of Participatory Design for Educational AI
    Michael Madaio
    Learning Under Algorithmic Conditions, University of Minnesota Press (2026)
    Preview abstract Participatory design is a long-standing effort to shift control over technology design from technologists to users and communities impacted by technologies. For educational AI, this means involving students, families, teachers, and other stakeholders in shaping the design of AI systems. While promising, in this article, I situate the recent calls for participatory design of educational AI systems within a different historical tradition—that of contests over local control of educational curricula. I argue that approaches that attempt to steer the design and development of educational AI through participatory methods may inadvertently reproduce the history of political contestation of educational curricula, in ways that may privilege the most powerful communities, rather than those inequitably impacted. What might it look like to treat participatory AI design as a site for political contestation? How might these approaches avoid reproducing the same majoritarian tendencies that led to educational inequities in the first place? View details
    Neural general circulation models for modeling precipitation
    Stephan Hoyer
    Dmitrii Kochkov
    Janni Yuval
    Ian Langmore
    Science Advances (2026)
    Preview abstract Climate models struggle to accurately simulate precipitation, particularly extremes and the diurnal cycle. While hybrid models combining machine learning and physics have emerged with the premise of improving precipitation simulations, none have proven sufficiently skillful or stable enough to outperform existing models in simulating precipitation. Here, we present the first hybrid model that is trained directly on precipitation observations. The model runs at 2.8 degrees resolution and is built on the differentiable NeuralGCM framework. This model is stable for decadal simulations and demonstrates significant improvements over existing GCMs, ERA5 reanalysis, and a Global Cloud-Resolving Model in simulating precipitation. Our approach yields reduced biases, a more realistic precipitation distribution, improved representation of extremes, and a more accurate diurnal cycle. Furthermore, it outperforms the ECMWF ensemble for mid-range weather forecasting. This advance paves the way for more reliable simulations of current climate and for the ability to fully utilize the abundance of existing observations to further improve GCMs. View details
    Peeking Ahead of the Field Study: Exploring VLM Personas as Support Tools for Embodied Studies in HCI
    Xinyue Gui
    Ding Xia
    Mark Colley
    Yuan Li
    Vishal Chauhan
    Anubhav Anubhav
    Ehsan Javanmardi
    Stela Hanbyeol Seo
    Chia-Ming Chang
    Manabu Tsukada
    Takeo Igarashi
    Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 26)
    Preview abstract Field studies are irreplaceable but costly, time-consuming, and error-prone, which need careful preparation. Inspired by rapid-prototyping in manufacturing, we propose a fast, low-cost evaluation method using Vision-Language Model (VLM) personas to simulate outcomes comparable to field results. While LLMs show human-like reasoning and language capabilities, autonomous vehicle (AV)-pedestrian interaction requires spatial awareness, emotional empathy, and behavioral generation. This raises our research question: To what extent can VLM personas mimic human responses in field studies? We conducted parallel studies: 1) one real-world study with 20 participants, and 2) one video-study using 20 VLM personas, both on a street-crossing task. We compared their responses and interviewed five HCI researchers on potential applications. Results show that VLM personas mimic human response patterns (e.g., average crossing times of 5.25 s vs. 5.07 s) lack the behavioral variability and depth. They show promise for formative studies, field study preparation, and human data augmentation. View details
    Improving Low-Vision Chart Accessibility via On-Cursor Visual Context
    Yotam Sechayk
    Hennes Rave
    Max Radler
    Mark Colley
    Ariel Shamir
    Takeo Igarashi
    Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 26)
    Preview abstract Despite widespread use, charts remain largely inaccessible for Low-Vision Individuals (LVI). Reading charts requires viewing data points within a global context, which is difficult for LVI who may rely on magnification or experience a partial field of vision. We aim to improve exploration by providing visual access to critical context. To inform this, we conducted a formative study with five LVI. We identified four fundamental contextual elements common across chart types: axes, legend, grid lines, and the overview. We propose two pointer-based interaction methods to provide this context: Dynamic Context, a novel focus+context interaction, and Mini-map, which adapts overview+detail principles for LVI. In a study with N=22 LVI, we compared both methods and evaluated their integration to current tools. Our results show that Dynamic Context had significant positive impact on access, usability, and effort reduction; however, worsened visual load. Mini-map strengthened spatial understanding, but was less preferred for this task. We offer design insights to guide the development of future systems that support LVI with visual context while balancing visual load. View details
    Preview abstract In modern Kubernetes environments, eBPF (Extended Berkeley Packet Filter) has become the de facto standard for high-performance dataplane enforcement. However, this architecture introduces a complex distributed state problem: the asynchronous synchronization between the Kubernetes control plane (Intent) and the kernel-space BPF maps (Reality). A critical failure mode, termed “Silent Divergence,” occurs when the control plane believes a network policy or identity is applied, but the underlying kernel state is missing or corrupted. In this “Gray Failure” state, standard observability tools—including logs, liveness probes, and agent status checks—report health, while the network silently drops traffic. This paper introduces eBPF-Auditor, a specialized consistency verification framework. Unlike standard agents that rely on event-based reconciliation, eBPF-Auditor performs a periodic “Two-Way State Audit” that mathematically verifies the intersection of Kubernetes Intent and BPF Reality. We demonstrate through fault injection and benchmarks on 5,000 pods that this approach successfully detects state drift with 100% accuracy and negligible sub-millisecond overhead (ms), making it a viable solution for high-frequency runtime verification in production hyperscale clusters. View details
    Preview abstract The accelerated integration of generative AI technologies and agentic AI tools, particularly those like ChatGPT, into workplace settings has introduced complex challenges concerning data governance, regulatory compliance, and organizational privacy (GDPR 2016; CCPA/CPRA). This study introduces the Digital Shadow AI Risk Theoretical Framework (DART)—a novel theoretical framework designed to systematically identify, classify, and address the latent risks arising from the widespread, and often unregulated, use of AI systems in professional environments (NIST, 2023; OECD AI Policy Observatory, 2023). DART introduces six original, interrelated constructs developed in this study: Unintentional Disclosure Risk, Trust-Dependence Paradox, Data Sovereignty Conflict, Knowledge Dilution Phenomenon, Ethical Black Box Problem, and Organizational Feedback Loops. Each construct reflects a unique dimension of risk that emerges as organizations increasingly rely on AI-driven tools for knowledge work and decision-making. The framework is empirically tested through a mixed-methods research design involving hypothesis testing and statistical analysis of behavioral data gathered from cross-sectional surveys of industry professionals. Two cross-industry surveys (Survey-1: 416 responses, 374 analyzed; Survey-2: 203 responses, 179 analyzed) and CB-SEM tests supported seven of eight hypotheses; H4 (sovereignty) was not significant; H7 (knowledge dilution) was confirmed in replication. The findings highlight critical gaps in employee training, policy awareness, and risk mitigation strategies—underscoring the urgent need for updated governance frameworks, comprehensive AI-use policies, and targeted educational interventions. This paper contributes to emerging scholarship by offering a robust model for understanding and mitigating digital risks in AI-enabled workplaces, providing practical implications for compliance officers, risk managers, and organizational leaders aiming to harness the benefits of generative AI responsibly and securely. The novelty of DART lies in its explicit theorization of workplace-level behavioral risks—especially Shadow AI, which unlike Shadow IT externalizes organizational knowledge into adaptive systems—thereby offering a unified framework that bridges fragmented literatures and grounds them in empirical evidence. View details
    Preview abstract Advanced reasoning typically requires Chain-of-Thought prompting, which is accurate but incurs prohibitive latency and substantial test-time inference costs. The standard alternative, fine-tuning smaller models, often sacrifices interpretability while introducing significant resource and operational overhead. To address these limitations, we introduce Prompt-Level Distillation (PLD). We extract explicit reasoning patterns from a Teacher model and organize them into a structured list of expressive instructions for the Student model's System Prompt. Evaluated on the StereoSet and Contract-NLI datasets using Gemma-3 4B, PLD improved Macro F1 scores from 57\% to 90.0\% and 67\% to 83\% respectively, enabling this compact model to match frontier performance with negligible latency overhead. These expressive instructions render the decision-making process transparent, allowing for full human verification of logic, making this approach ideal for regulated industries such as law, finance, and content moderation, as well as high-volume use cases and edge devices. View details
    GUIDE: A Benchmark for User Context Understanding and Assistance in GUI Workflow Videos
    Saelyne Yang
    Jaesang Yu
    Yi-Hao Peng
    Kevin Qinghong Lin
    Jae Won Cho
    Juho Kim
    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2026)
    Preview abstract Graphical User Interface (GUI) agents have the potential to assist users in interacting with complex software. While prior research has primarily focused on automating user actions through clicks and keystrokes, this paradigm overlooks human intention, where users value the ability to explore, iterate, and refine their ideas while maintaining agency.To move beyond automation and toward collaboration, GUI agents must understand what users are doing and why. We introduce GUIDE (GUI Understanding, Intent, and Help Decision Evaluation), a benchmark that evaluates AI models on their ability to perceive user behavior, infer intent, and provide assistance in open-ended GUI tasks. GUIDE consists of 67.5 hours of screen recordings from 120 novice user demonstrations with think-aloud narrations that surface user intent, across 10 complex software (e.g., PowerPoint, Photoshop). GUIDE defines three tasks—(i) Behavior State Detection, (ii) Intent Prediction, and (iii) Help Prediction that test a model’s ability to recognize behavior state, reason about goals, and decide when and how to help. Evaluations across eight state-of-the-art multimodal models reveal that all models struggled with the tasks, achieving only 44.6% and 55.0% accuracy on behavior state and help prediction. However, providing user context such as behavioral state and intent significantly improved the performance, raising help prediction by up to 50.2%. These results highlight the critical role of structured user understanding in effective assistance.Our benchmark provides a path toward GUI agents that go beyond automation to become truly user-aware collaborators. View details
    Preview abstract This defensive publication describes a framework for multi-artificial intelligence (AI) orchestration that can be used to address potential limitations associated with reliance on single AI models, such as correlated systemic failures or cognitive blind spots. The described system is a cognitive orchestration framework that can function as a middleware layer to manage tasks across a heterogeneous ensemble of AI models. An orchestrator node can decompose a user request into a sequence of sub-tasks, which an arbitrage engine may then dynamically assign to suitable AI models based on certain factors, such as capability, cost, and latency. For certain tasks, such as those designated as high-risk, a byzantine consensus layer can route the task to multiple diverse models in parallel and may trigger a process, for example a 'cognitive debate,' which could be adjudicated by a third-party judge model to help resolve conflicting outputs. This framework can facilitate a more resilient system that may improve the accuracy and reliability of outputs when compared to some single-model architectures. View details
    Preview abstract We introduce AASE (Activation-based AI Safety Enforcement), a framework for post-perception safety monitoring in large language models. Unlike pre-perception approaches that analyze input or output text, AASE monitors the model's internal activation patterns—what the model "understands" rather than what text it processes or generates—enabling detection of safety-relevant states before harmful outputs are produced. The framework comprises three techniques: Activation Fingerprinting (AF) for harmful content detection, Agent Action Gating (AAG) for prompt injection defense, and Activation Policy Compliance (APC) for enterprise policy enforcement. We introduce paired contrastive training to isolate safety-relevant signals from confounding factors such as topic and style, addressing signal entanglement in polysemantic activations. Validation across 7 models from 3 architecture families shows strong class separation: Gemma-2-9B achieves AUC 1.00 with 7.2σ separation across all probes; AAG achieves AUC ≥0.88 across all models on the InjecAgent benchmark; APC achieves 0.97-1.00 AUC across three enterprise policies. Model size correlates with probe quality—Gemma-2-9B (7.2σ separation) outperforms Gemma-2-2B (4.3σ). All techniques survive INT4 quantization with minimal separation degradation. AASE is 9× faster than Llama Guard 3 (33ms vs 306ms) with higher TPR (88% vs 50%) at a tunable threshold that trades FPR for detection sensitivity, adding only 0.002ms probe overhead to existing inference. View details
    Preview abstract Multimodal large language models (LLMs) integrate and process information from multiple modalities such as text, images, audio, and video, enabling complex tasks such as audio translation and visual question answering. While powerful, this complexity introduces novel vulnerabilities to sophisticated adversarial attacks. This survey paper provides a comprehensive overview of this rapidly expanding field, systematically categorizing attacks that range from manipulations of single modalities (e.g., perturbed images or audio) to those exploiting cross-modal interactions. We overview how these attacks exploit weaknesses in model fusion, attention mechanisms, and representation learning and provided analyses on their potential for real-world consequences. View details
    Preview abstract Validating conversational artificial intelligence (AI) for regulated medical software applications may present challenges, as static test datasets and manual review may be limited in identifying emergent, conversational anomalies. A multi-agent AI system may be configured in a closed-loop for automated validation. The system can, for example, utilize an end user persona simulator agent to generate prompts for a target model and a domain /regulatory expert adjudicator agent to evaluate the target model’s responses against a configurable rubric. A meta-analysis agent can analyze anomalies to identify underlying vulnerabilities, which may then be used to programmatically synthesize new adversarial personas. This adaptive process can generate evidence to support regulatory compliance and continuous performance monitoring for medical software algorithms systems. View details
    ×