Quantifying urban park use in the USA at scale: empirical estimates of realised park usage using smartphone location data
Abstract
Summary
Background A large body of evidence connects access to greenspace with substantial benefits to physical and mental
health. In urban settings where access to greenspace can be limited, park access and use have been associated with
higher levels of physical activity, improved physical health, and lower levels of markers of mental distress. Despite the
potential health benefits of urban parks, little is known about how park usage varies across locations (between or
within cities) or over time.
Methods We estimated park usage among urban residents (identified as residents of urban census tracts) in
498 US cities from 2019 to 2021 from aggregated and anonymised opted-in smartphone location history data. We
used descriptive statistics to quantify differences in park usage over time, between cities, and across census tracts
within cities, and used generalised linear models to estimate the associations between park usage and census tract
level descriptors.
Findings In spring (March 1 to May 31) 2019, 18·9% of urban residents visited a park at least once per week, with
average use higher in northwest and southwest USA, and lowest in the southeast. Park usage varied substantially
both within and between cities; was unequally distributed across census tract-level markers of race, ethnicity, income,
and social vulnerability; and was only moderately correlated with established markers of census tract greenspace. In
spring 2019, a doubling of walking time to parks was associated with a 10·1% (95% CI 5·6–14·3) lower average
weekly park usage, adjusting for city and social vulnerability index. The median decline in park usage from spring
2019 to spring 2020 was 38·0% (IQR 28·4–46·5), coincident with the onset of physical distancing policies across
much of the country. We estimated that the COVID-19-related decline in park usage was more pronounced for those
living further from a park and those living in areas of higher social vulnerability.
Interpretation These estimates provide novel insights into the patterns and correlates of park use and could enable
new studies of the health benefits of urban greenspace. In addition, the availability of an empirical park usage metric
that varies over time could be a useful tool for assessing the effectiveness of policies intended to increase such
activities.
Background A large body of evidence connects access to greenspace with substantial benefits to physical and mental
health. In urban settings where access to greenspace can be limited, park access and use have been associated with
higher levels of physical activity, improved physical health, and lower levels of markers of mental distress. Despite the
potential health benefits of urban parks, little is known about how park usage varies across locations (between or
within cities) or over time.
Methods We estimated park usage among urban residents (identified as residents of urban census tracts) in
498 US cities from 2019 to 2021 from aggregated and anonymised opted-in smartphone location history data. We
used descriptive statistics to quantify differences in park usage over time, between cities, and across census tracts
within cities, and used generalised linear models to estimate the associations between park usage and census tract
level descriptors.
Findings In spring (March 1 to May 31) 2019, 18·9% of urban residents visited a park at least once per week, with
average use higher in northwest and southwest USA, and lowest in the southeast. Park usage varied substantially
both within and between cities; was unequally distributed across census tract-level markers of race, ethnicity, income,
and social vulnerability; and was only moderately correlated with established markers of census tract greenspace. In
spring 2019, a doubling of walking time to parks was associated with a 10·1% (95% CI 5·6–14·3) lower average
weekly park usage, adjusting for city and social vulnerability index. The median decline in park usage from spring
2019 to spring 2020 was 38·0% (IQR 28·4–46·5), coincident with the onset of physical distancing policies across
much of the country. We estimated that the COVID-19-related decline in park usage was more pronounced for those
living further from a park and those living in areas of higher social vulnerability.
Interpretation These estimates provide novel insights into the patterns and correlates of park use and could enable
new studies of the health benefits of urban greenspace. In addition, the availability of an empirical park usage metric
that varies over time could be a useful tool for assessing the effectiveness of policies intended to increase such
activities.
