Artists + machine intelligence (AMI) research awards
Overview
How can art help us navigate the present, and envision collective futures with AI? Founded in 2016, Artists + Machine Intelligence is a forward-looking program dedicated to building and sustaining a field of creative practitioners working with machine learning (ML). As AI becomes part of our daily lives, the arts and humanities are uniquely suited to explore how these technologies act upon society and vice versa.
Research awards support higher education faculty pursuing cultural research related to ML and its impact on the visual arts, architecture, design, literature, and philosophy with $20,000 USD in funding.
Application status
Applications are currently closed.
Decisions for the August 2024 application will be announced via email by October 2024. Please check back in Spring 2025 for details on future application cycles.
-
Applications open
-
Applications close
-
Notification of proposal decisions
Research topics
This year we welcome proposals across three priority research areas:
- Futures Writing
- Arts Writing + Criticism
- Public understanding of AI through literary & visual culture
Please refer to the AMI Research Awards 2024 RFP for full details.
Award details
Award amounts are fixed at $20K USD per successful proposal. Funds are disbursed as unrestricted gifts to the university and are not intended for overhead or indirect costs.
Requirements
- Open to full-time professors (assistant, associate, etc.) at a accredited degree-granting research institution around the world
- Applicants may only serve as Principal Investigator (PI) or co-PI on one proposal per round
- Proposals must be related to the arts and technology
In addition to the guidance provided in our FAQ section, proposals should consider the following:
- A well articulated research problem statement
- Detailed description of the approach and methodology
- Articulate the multi-disciplinary perspectives of the research team (where appropriate)
- Expected impact clearly articulated
Past Award recipients
FAQs
Full-time faculty at accredited degree-granting institutions around the world are eligible to apply. Faculty must apply in their capacity as a university professor and be able to accept an award through that university.
Faculty from not-for-profit organizations, hospitals, or non-degree-granting research institutes etc.) are not eligible to apply, even if the institutions are affiliated with a University.
Please use the following guidelines for content, formatting and length:
Filename:
- Submit your proposal and CV as a single PDF file.
- Name the file in the following format: "[InstitutionFullName]-2024" (e.g., "GoogleUniversity-2024"). Use only letters, numbers, and hyphens.
Proposal Length:
- 5 pages maximum for a single Principal Investigator (PI) submission
- 7 pages maximum for submissions with a co-PI with CV
Formatting:
- Single-spaced
- 1-inch margins
- Times New Roman 12-point font
Proposal should include the following numbered sections:
Overview (3 pages max):
- Proposal Title
- Full name, contact information (postal address, email address, phone), and affiliation (institution and/or department) of PI(s)
- Abstract (concise summary of proposal)
- Research goals and problem statement
- Description of the proposed work, expected outcomes, and results
- Discussion of how the research relates to prior work (including your own)
- Explanation of your qualifications to conduct this research
- For ongoing projects, explain how this funding (whether by unrestricted gift or another type, specified in the RFP) would enhance your existing project.
- For RFPs that specify the use of a particular product, methodology, or other constraint, please clearly describe how your project will incorporate and utilize that specific requirement.
- Data policy: Describe your intentions for sharing the project's output with the broader research community (e.g., open-sourcing code, making datasets public). Please note that for those awards that are structured as unrestricted gifts, there are no legal requirements once a project is selected for funding. This is simply a statement of your current intentions.
CVs (4 pages max):
- Primary PI: 2-page max CV required
- Co-PI: 2-page max CV (optional)
Important notes
- The co-PI's CV is the only content allowed on the additional 2 pages of a co-PI proposal. Any submitted CV longer than 2 pages will be truncated before review.
- Proposals without a co-PI's CV should not exceed 5 pages.
- References and budget details should be excluded from the proposal itself. Instead, use the designated sections in the application form for this information.
- The budget section requires a detailed breakdown of each expense, using the following format:
- Description: [Brief description of the item]
- Unit Cost: [Cost per unit] x Quantity: [Number of units] = Total Cost: [Total cost of the item]
- The budget section requires a detailed breakdown of each expense, using the following format:
References and budget details should be excluded from the proposal itself. Instead, use the designated sections in the application form for this information. The budget section requires a detailed breakdown of each expense, using the following format:
Description: [Brief description of the item]
Unit Cost: [Cost per unit] x Quantity: [Number of units] = Total Cost: [Total cost of the item]
Co-PIs must generally meet the same eligibility criteria as primary PIs, except in cases where the co-PI is a postdoctoral researcher.
Here's how to strengthen your proposal:
- Clearly define the problem. Good research starts with a compelling question.
- Describe a specific, achievable outcome. What will this research enable that wouldn't happen otherwise, and how? Outline both minimum expected and best-case scenarios, specifying the datasets and test cases you'll use.
- Differentiate your contribution. Clearly explain how your work advances the state of the art, using citations and other standard practices.
- Outline your approach. Explain your plan for addressing the research challenges, even if all answers aren't yet known. Identify potential risks and mitigation strategies.
- Contextualize the work. Describe existing funding and how this proposal fits into your broader research goals. How will this research be used? Will it build research capability, create a tool, reproduce a result, foster collaboration, follow up on an idea, or explore a new one? We are interested in all possibilities.
- Make it accessible to non-experts. While we try to have your proposal reviewed by a Google expert in your field, it will also be read by non-experts, so please ensure the motivation and outcomes are understandable to a broad audience.
Your proposal should ultimately demonstrate how your research aligns with our mission to recognize and support academic researchers whose work in computing and technology makes a positive difference in the world.
We completely understand the desire to receive feedback and do our best to meet this request. However, due to the high volume of applications received, you may not receive feedback on your proposal.
Only complete applications that meet the following criteria will be scored:
- Submitted by eligible applicants
- Related to computing or technology in one or more focus areas
- Adhere to the required formatting guidelines
Scoring will be based on the following areas:
- Faculty merit: Faculty is accomplished in research, community engagement, and open source contributions, with potential to contribute to responsible innovation.
- Research merit: Faculty's proposed research is aligned with Google Research interests, innovative, and likely to have a significant impact on the field.
- Proposal quality: The research proposal is clear, focused, and well-organized, and it demonstrates the team's ability to successfully execute the research and achieve a significant impact.
- AI Ethics principles: The research proposal strongly aligns with Google's AI Principles
- For research area topics that require the use of a specific product, methodology, or other constraint, we will evaluate your project based on how well it adheres to and utilizes these aforementioned factors, as well as the overall quality of your approach.
- July: Applications open
- September: Proposals are under review
- October: Applicants are notified of decision
Funding awards made in any form should not be used for overhead or indirect costs.
Please reach out to artwithmi@google.com with any questions or concerns, and our team will be happy to assist you.